3 pages, you'd think someone would make some sort of attempt to answer the question by now
Why don't you do it? It's a dumb question anyway .. right up your alley.
3 pages, you'd think someone would make some sort of attempt to answer the question by now
so you ARE in favor of the government spending money it doesn't have, exactly the opposite of what you recommended in the other thread. "simple" you said.OK, first and foremost NAOS seems to have created this thread based on a quip I made in the another thread about not spending money you don't have or quit spending more than you make or something to that effect. He and a couple others took it to mean that I advocate a stop on all excess spending immediately. Of course that's ludicrous and would be disastrous.
Why don't you do it? It's a dumb question anyway .. right up your alley.
you weren't being trolled, you were being given an opportunity to explain your position in a respectful constructive manner.Okay. Thanks spazz .. thanks for opening my eyes that I've been being trolled all this time. At least I feel better knowing people aren't as stupid as they pretend to be.
anyway, as fuzzy as the responses are, it appears that the right here does not really want to have the government stop spending money it doesn't have after all. They don't know what would happen, but the consensus is, it would be bad.
you weren't being trolled, you were being given an opportunity to explain your position in a respectful manner.
you have failed.
You explained that you will not answer the question.Read the thread, you complete tool. I explained myself very well.