I don't see much separation between 9, 14, and 21 so I'm inclined to keep 14 and 21 rather than trade two for one.
Maybe if I liked CJ that much more than Shroeder but I don't.
Schroeder + Giannis > McCollum IMO.
True, but there isn't a guarantee that Schroeder is there at #14. Getting #9 all but insures getting one of them, or getting a player like Shabazz. It would be a real-time decision for both teams based on how the first 8 picks shake out. But if McCollum and Schroeder are both gone at #10, then the Jazz are a bit stuck, at least at PG.
fixed.i could do Chad Ford's and Todd McShay's jobs better if they were drunk.
CJ and who everIf the Jazz drafted two point guards who would you want?
I don't see much separation between 9, 14, and 21 so I'm inclined to keep 14 and 21 rather than trade two for one.
Maybe if I liked CJ that much more than Shroeder but I don't.
Schroeder + Giannis > McCollum IMO.
Well, if Schroeder and McCollum are both gone when the Jazz pick, that means that another decent player will slip to us, but if I'm the Jazz, I'd put a few deals on the table as a contingency plan.
Well, if Schroeder and McCollum are both gone when the Jazz pick, that means that another decent player will slip to us, but if I'm the Jazz, I'd put a few deals on the table as a contingency plan.
Yeah someone good will be there at 14. And I agree, I hope our new GM is actively working on deals and not sitting on his hands.
Who are you thinking?
who the bloody hell cares! They all pretty much are the sickliest sucks that ever did suck.... (Homer Simpson)
I'd say if Mavs are asking too much for the #13 pick, we'd just shut up and pick BPA at #14 and #21 respectively.
TBH witchu I'd have no problem getting Adams at #14 and a potential stud 2-way wing who can shoot 3's at #21 like Bullock, Crabbe, Rice, Saric, Kerasev.
Then tank hard and get a PG next year.
TBH witchu I'd have no problem getting Adams at #14 and a potential stud 2-way wing who can shoot 3's at #21 like Bullock, Crabbe, Rice, Saric, Kerasev.
Then tank hard and get a PG next year.
It's not that simple. They'd be getting >$10 million in cap space, and if they think they can get both Dwight and CP3, then that likely is the difference in getting both or getting neither. Getting some project big from France or some project big from New Zealand hardly looks good in comparison.I think this Mavs trading #13 rumor is just a rumor though... the draft is the best place to get quality players on the cheap. For the 13th pick it'll cost the Mavs $1.6mil to get a potential serviceable big man in Gobert/Adams. You're not gonna be able to do better than that for the same amount of talent in the FA market.
Mavs are probably just gauging interests... unless they get a bombshell of an offer, they'd probably keeping the pick...
It's not that simple. They'd be getting >$10 million in cap space, and if they think they can get both Dwight and CP3, then that likely is the difference in getting both or getting neither. Getting some project big from France or some project big from New Zealand hardly looks good in comparison.