What's new
By:

Following potential 2013 draftees

Iverson should be there @ pick 46.
If Jazz want Withey or Plumlee use Mavs' 13th pick.
Grab Shroeder with the 14th.
Grab Giannis with pick 21.

Or use pick 46 on Bongo, since 13 pick gets you a big.
 
I could picture Minnesota offering #9 for Burks. I'm not saying the Jazz do that, but I could see Minny offering it. There isn't a SG that clearly belongs at #9, and KCP would be a bit of a reach there.

Maybe the Jazz offer #14 + #21 for #9.
 
I don't see much separation between 9, 14, and 21 so I'm inclined to keep 14 and 21 rather than trade two for one.

Maybe if I liked CJ that much more than Shroeder but I don't.

Schroeder + Giannis > McCollum IMO.
 
BENTLEY said:
I don't see much separation between 9, 14, and 21 so I'm inclined to keep 14 and 21 rather than trade two for one.

Maybe if I liked CJ that much more than Shroeder but I don't.

Schroeder + Giannis > McCollum IMO.
Click to expand...

True, but there isn't a guarantee that Schroeder is there at #14. Getting #9 all but insures getting one of them, or getting a player like Shabazz. It would be a real-time decision for both teams based on how the first 8 picks shake out. But if McCollum and Schroeder are both gone at #10, then the Jazz are a bit stuck, at least at PG.
 
Catchall said:
True, but there isn't a guarantee that Schroeder is there at #14. Getting #9 all but insures getting one of them, or getting a player like Shabazz. It would be a real-time decision for both teams based on how the first 8 picks shake out. But if McCollum and Schroeder are both gone at #10, then the Jazz are a bit stuck, at least at PG.
Click to expand...

I think some Jazz fanz are overvaluing point guards because we want one. Bigs rise. Maybe not CJ but I think it's likely Schroeder will be there at 14.
Jazz grab the 13th pick from Mavs and we only have to worry about 12 teams passing on both CJ and Schroeder. Maybe your worries will come to fruition and both are gone before the Jazz pick but I don't think so.
 
Well, if Schroeder and McCollum are both gone when the Jazz pick, that means that another decent player will slip to us, but if I'm the Jazz, I'd put a few deals on the table as a contingency plan.
 
PointGod_AlecBurks said:
i could do Chad Ford's and Todd McShay's jobs better if they were drunk.
Click to expand...
fixed.
Jazzonic3030 said:
If the Jazz drafted two point guards who would you want?
Click to expand...
CJ and who ever
BENTLEY said:
I don't see much separation between 9, 14, and 21 so I'm inclined to keep 14 and 21 rather than trade two for one.

Maybe if I liked CJ that much more than Shroeder but I don't.

Schroeder + Giannis > McCollum IMO.
Click to expand...

who the bloody hell cares! They all pretty much are the sickliest sucks that ever did suck.... (Homer Simpson)
 
Catchall said:
Well, if Schroeder and McCollum are both gone when the Jazz pick, that means that another decent player will slip to us, but if I'm the Jazz, I'd put a few deals on the table as a contingency plan.
Click to expand...


Yeah someone good will be there at 14. And I agree, I hope our new GM is actively working on deals and not sitting on his hands.
 
BENTLEY said:
Yeah someone good will be there at 14. And I agree, I hope our new GM is actively working on deals and not sitting on his hands.
Click to expand...

Nah, I'm not holding my breaths. KOC and Lindsey have proven to be "too proud to make a deal". They're definitely at the wrong end of the spectrum with Morey at the other. More than just about anything they'd rather not be known for "getting shafted".

I'd say if Mavs are asking too much for the #13 pick, we'd just shut up and pick BPA at #14 and #21 respectively.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top