A-Train (old)
Well-Known Member
I am sure almost everyone here saw the Summer League Game today. Burke was decent, improved a lot from the first game, but he is still pretty nervous as you can tell.
In six games vs. OKC in the playoffs this year (5 of which he started in) Beverley averaged 11.8 PPG, 5.5 RPG, 2.8 APG, 1 TOPG and shot 43% from the field in 33 MPG.
To compare both players in the Summer League game today let's see what their stats were today:
Trey Burke, 11 points, 2 assists, 2 rebounds, 4 turnovers, on 33% from the field.
Patrick Beverley 11 points, 3 assists, 4 rebounds, 2 turnovers on 50% from the field.
Obviously Beverley has a season under his belt and started in five playoff games last season. If he performed so well in the playoffs and was sub-par today, why does everybody think Burke is going to suck just because of a few unimpressive games?
Trey Burke will be fine and will win Rookie of the Year, book it.
In six games vs. OKC in the playoffs this year (5 of which he started in) Beverley averaged 11.8 PPG, 5.5 RPG, 2.8 APG, 1 TOPG and shot 43% from the field in 33 MPG.
To compare both players in the Summer League game today let's see what their stats were today:
Trey Burke, 11 points, 2 assists, 2 rebounds, 4 turnovers, on 33% from the field.
Patrick Beverley 11 points, 3 assists, 4 rebounds, 2 turnovers on 50% from the field.
Obviously Beverley has a season under his belt and started in five playoff games last season. If he performed so well in the playoffs and was sub-par today, why does everybody think Burke is going to suck just because of a few unimpressive games?
Trey Burke will be fine and will win Rookie of the Year, book it.