What's new

Trump Dictatorship and All Things Politics

JD Vance: Sir, I think your heart is in the right place but how are you going to jerk off every man who voted for you? It seems like a it is going to be a major problem!
Trump: It's gonna be super easy, barely an inconvenience...
JD: Oh really?
T: Yeah...
Donald-Trump-oct-13-2024-billboard-1548.jpg


T: I'll use both hands and jerk off two dudes at a time!
JD: Ohh. Jerking off two dudes at a time is TIGHT!


credit: Ryan George
 
JD Vance: Sir, I think your heart is in the right place but how are you going to jerk off every man who voted for you? It seems like a it is going to be a major problem!
Trump: It's gonna be super easy, barely an inconvenience...
JD: Oh really?
T: Yeah...
Donald-Trump-oct-13-2024-billboard-1548.jpg


T: I'll use both hands and jerk off two dudes at a time!
JD: Ohh. Jerking off two dudes at a time is TIGHT!


credit: Ryan George
Oh wowowow wow wow.


Wow
 
Where are you getting your propaganda?
I started investing on my own during covid and I would watch the articles related to the stock market, which is where I mostly realized the media was lying about everything. There are certain things related to finance and the economy they just can't lie about. They still try to spin it, but you can see through most of it if you are paying attention.
The fact the fed have not dropped interests rates lately under Trump shows the double standard and how against Trump and the American people the deep state is.

I think you needed to look closer. Same with PJF, he needed to look closer.

This is from MarketWatch:


The economy created a seemingly healthy 147,000 new jobs in June and the unemployment rate fell to a four-month low. Great news, right? Not if you look under the hood.

A close look at the June employment report suggests the labor market actually deteriorated last month. Fewer companies were hiring and more people stopped looking for work because jobs were harder to find.

“The June jobs report suggests the underlying trend in the economy was very tepid in June and in the second quarter,” said Bill Adams, chief economist of Comerica.

Let’s start with the headline increase in jobs.

Of the 147,000 new jobs created, half were in state and local government. The private sector added the fewest new workers in eight months. Not good.

The rise in state and local hiring was also a mirage.

Since fewer school employees than usual became unemployed last month, the government’s seasonal-adjustment process made it seem like there was a big increase in education jobs.

There wasn’t. In fact, the actual or unadjusted number of state and local jobs fell last month. That’s what usually happens at the end of the school year.

The private sector, meanwhile, added a meager 74,000 jobs in June, marking the smallest gain in eight months.
That’s bad enough. Even worse, almost all the new jobs were created in just one part of the economy: healthcare. Hardly any other industry was hiring.

What about the decline in the unemployment rate? It fell a tick to 4.1%.

The real reason was that some 329,000 people dropped out of the labor force, with many of them saying they were too discouraged by how hard it was to find a job.

This is an ongoing trend in 2025.

The so-called participation rate fell in June to a 2½-year low of 62.3%, down from a postpandemic peak of 62.8% two years ago. This rate tells us what share of people of working age either have a job or are looking for one.
Don’t look for participation to improve, either. For good or ill, the Trump administration’s crackdown on immigration has squeezed the supply of labor.

Another sign of weakness: Companies are no longer giving big pay raises each year since leverage in the labor market has shifted to employers from employees.

The increase in worker pay in the past year slowed to 3.7% in June, just a hair above the prepandemic peak.

A few years ago, companies were so desperate to hire in an era of chronic labor shortages that wages grew as fast as 6% a year.
Those days are over.

“Although the overall number of jobs was very strong, the weakness was broad-based across the private sector,” said chief economist Eugenio Aleman of Raymond James. “The labor market continued to weaken in June.”


Expectations heading into this week showed projections of about 110,000 new jobs having been added in the United States in June. As it turns out, according to the new report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the totals exceeded those expectations. CNBC News reported:

Job growth proved better than expected in June, as the labor market showed surprising resilience in the wake of President Donald Trump’s calls for interest rate cuts. Nonfarm payrolls increased a seasonally adjusted 147,000 for the month, higher than the estimate for 110,000, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Thursday. The unemployment rate fell to 4.1%, against a forecast for a slight increase to 4.3%.
There’s nothing especially wrong with the preliminary topline totals from June — 147,000 jobs is a mediocre number, though hardly a disaster — but as is always the case, context is everything.

Over the first six months of 2025, the latest data suggests the economy has added 782,000 jobs. That said, over the first six months of 2024 — when Donald Trump said the economy was terrible — the total was 985,000 jobs, and over the first six months of 2023, the U.S. economy added 1.53 million jobs.

In fact, if we exclude 2020, when the pandemic wreaked havoc on the economy, the first six months of this year show the slowest job growth in the United States since 2010, when the economy was still trying to recover from the Great Recession.

(THIS): In other words, the White House and its allies are likely to celebrate the new not-that-bad data as terrific news, but the question the president and his team ought to face is simple: “Why has American job growth slowed this year to a 15-year low?”


Fox Business Network anchor Maria Bartiromo was stunned when the jobs report she read on-air Wednesday missed its projected growth and instead showed a decline.

Earlier that day, the firm ADP released its report on private sector hiring for the month of June. Although the private sector was projected to see an increase of nearly 100,000 jobs, Wednesday’s report showed hiring had actually contracted to the tune of 33,000. As noted in a report by CNBC, it is the first month of job loss in the private sector since March 2023.

In a statement published with the jobs report, ADP Chief Economist Nela Richardsoncited a “hesitancy to hire and a reluctance to replace departing workers” as the reason for the losses.

Just moments before the job numbers were available to her, Bartiromo — joined by Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) — told viewers that they were projected to be very good. When they weren’t, she quickly changed the subject.

“We are waiting any moment now to get the jobs numbers for the month of May,” she said. “The expectations call for the ADP numbers to be up 95,000 for the month of June, rather. It’s the June jobs data. And we’ll, of course — right now, seeing the number actually show a decline in jobs. Down 33,000 on ADP.”

Bartiromo didn’t skip a beat and moved on, “The bill includes $25 billion for the ‘Golden Dome,’ the missile defense system. Senator, you introduced a bill supporting the construction of that system. I want to get your take on defense and whether or not that’s an area you see continuing to grow, because everyone’s trying to figure out where the economic growth comes from on a day that we see the June ADP numbers down 33,000 jobs in the month of June versus an estimate of up 95,000, Senator.”
 
Last edited:
Dehumanization is the foundation for the worst of History’s atrocities. Trump, Miller, Vance, Holman, all are pulling out all the stops to demonize and dehumanize immigrants. It’s not to the level of the Holocaust, but this is what Trump is doing: he is dehumanizing a group of human beings in the best tradition of Adolph Hitler. Remember, evil is banal, but it’s still evil. With ICE about to see its funding go through the roof, we will see our own brown shirts roaming our streets and cities, broadcasting to the entire world what the United States has become.
 
I think we all saw that coming from miles away. Still pretty shocking though most people will just shrug and move on without a second thought
No no no

Trump doesn’t mean he’ll deport US citizens like me, my family, and my friends in my ward. What Trump means is “those other” American citizens. You know, Those that deserve it and who aren’t real citizens. I mean sure they might have birth certificates. But they don’t act like or look like real American citizens. You know, globalist types who poison our blood. I for sure know that he won’t actually deport real American citizens. You just have too much TDS

/s
 
Last edited:
No no no

Trump doesn’t mean he’ll deport US citizens like me, my family, and my friends in my ward. What Trump means is “those other” American citizens. You know, Those that deserve it and who aren’t real citizens. I mean sure they might have birth certificates. But they don’t act like or look like real American citizens. You know, globalist types who poison our blood. I for sure know that he won’t actually deport real American citizens. You just have too much TDS

/s
Honestly though as long as you are the right color, to a lesser extent the right gender, as in one of the "approved" genders, preferably "M", and, absolutely the most importantly, keep your ****ing mouth shut, then you are **probably** ok. Probably.
 


Psychologist coins new one-word term to define Trump's constant sense of persecution​

Story by Carl Gibson
• 4h•
3 min read


Ever since his legal troubles began in 2023, President Donald Trump has reaped great financial and political benefit from convincing his base of supporters that he's about to be victimized by vengeful governments. One scholar may have come up with a new term that could serve as a catch-all way

Psychology-focused news outlet PsyPost reported Monday on a recently published study by Kathryn Claire Higgins of Goldsmiths, University of London entitled "From Victimhood to Victimcould: Hypothetical injury and the 'criminalization' of Donald Trump." The study delved into Trump's pattern of constantly messaging to his supporters that he was – as PsyPost founder Eric W. Dolan wrote — "perpetually on the brink of harm, casting himself as a target of state overreach and moral persecution."

"This, Higgins claims, is victimcould in action: a rhetorical strategy that moves public attention away from current injustices and redirects it toward imagined futures," Dolan wrote. "In doing so, far-right figures can appear vulnerable while simultaneously reinforcing policies that harm those who are actually marginalized."

The Goldsmiths, University of London researcher expanded on the concept of "victimcould" to include the larger far-right political movement as a whole. She observed that the right wing leverages the "mere possibility of future injury" as a justification to inflict harm on marginalized populations like immigrants and transgender individuals. And she added that "victimcould" was difficult to counter, as opponents constantly have to contend with shifting goalposts because of what may happen in an imagined future.

"Higgins argues that this amounts to a larger cultural reversal. Systems that actually cause harm are presented as necessary for safety," Dolan wrote. "People in positions of great power are portrayed as under attack. Privileged individuals are painted as the ones who are suffering. Far-right policies — such as harsh immigration rules, anti-trans laws, or cuts to public services — are framed not as acts of control or exclusion, but as necessary responses to looming threats."

As a means of illustrating the power of "victimcould," Higgins cited the viral spread of AI-generated images of Trump being arrested (which made their way around the internet before Trump was ever officially indicted). She warned that amidst of flood of content aimed at provoking an emotional response, it was more important than ever that American voters become more media literate in order to recognize when they're being manipulated to serve a particular partisan agenda.

"Generative AI, deepfakes, and viral social media posts all provide new tools for dramatizing imaginary futures," Dolan wrote of Higgins' paper. "But the deeper issue, she says, is not the technology itself — it’s the cultural willingness to treat possibility as reality when it serves a political agenda."
 
She warned that amidst of flood of content aimed at provoking an emotional response, it was more important than ever that American voters become more media literate in order to recognize when they're being manipulated to serve a particular partisan agenda.
It remains puzzling to me that so many adults fail to recognize a con artist. As adults, most of us learned at some time that you can’t just openly trust everyone. There are people out there ready to bs you and take advantage of you. Trump’s business history is a history of scams. Like Trump University. It’s hard to understand how adults abandon their recognition of con jobs, when Trump is about as transparent a bulls***ing con man as one could ever expect to recognize. I do understand if the man confirms their bias, their dislike of some Americans, etc., that folks will look the other way and ignore the signs of a con job, but having to give up a basic, common sense lesson of what we all should learn growing up, namely“you can’t trust everyone”, is strange…
 


Psychologist coins new one-word term to define Trump's constant sense of persecution​

Story by Carl Gibson
• 4h•
3 min read


Ever since his legal troubles began in 2023, President Donald Trump has reaped great financial and political benefit from convincing his base of supporters that he's about to be victimized by vengeful governments. One scholar may have come up with a new term that could serve as a catch-all way

Psychology-focused news outlet PsyPost reported Monday on a recently published study by Kathryn Claire Higgins of Goldsmiths, University of London entitled "From Victimhood to Victimcould: Hypothetical injury and the 'criminalization' of Donald Trump." The study delved into Trump's pattern of constantly messaging to his supporters that he was – as PsyPost founder Eric W. Dolan wrote — "perpetually on the brink of harm, casting himself as a target of state overreach and moral persecution."

"This, Higgins claims, is victimcould in action: a rhetorical strategy that moves public attention away from current injustices and redirects it toward imagined futures," Dolan wrote. "In doing so, far-right figures can appear vulnerable while simultaneously reinforcing policies that harm those who are actually marginalized."

The Goldsmiths, University of London researcher expanded on the concept of "victimcould" to include the larger far-right political movement as a whole. She observed that the right wing leverages the "mere possibility of future injury" as a justification to inflict harm on marginalized populations like immigrants and transgender individuals. And she added that "victimcould" was difficult to counter, as opponents constantly have to contend with shifting goalposts because of what may happen in an imagined future.

"Higgins argues that this amounts to a larger cultural reversal. Systems that actually cause harm are presented as necessary for safety," Dolan wrote. "People in positions of great power are portrayed as under attack. Privileged individuals are painted as the ones who are suffering. Far-right policies — such as harsh immigration rules, anti-trans laws, or cuts to public services — are framed not as acts of control or exclusion, but as necessary responses to looming threats."

As a means of illustrating the power of "victimcould," Higgins cited the viral spread of AI-generated images of Trump being arrested (which made their way around the internet before Trump was ever officially indicted). She warned that amidst of flood of content aimed at provoking an emotional response, it was more important than ever that American voters become more media literate in order to recognize when they're being manipulated to serve a particular partisan agenda.

"Generative AI, deepfakes, and viral social media posts all provide new tools for dramatizing imaginary futures," Dolan wrote of Higgins' paper. "But the deeper issue, she says, is not the technology itself — it’s the cultural willingness to treat possibility as reality when it serves a political agenda."
Sounds about right
 
It remains puzzling to me that so many adults fail to recognize a con artist. As adults, most of us learned at some time that you can’t just openly trust everyone. There are people out there ready to bs you and take advantage of you. Trump’s business history is a history of scams. Like Trump University. It’s hard to understand how adults abandon their recognition of con jobs, when Trump is about as transparent a bulls***ing con man as one could ever expect to recognize. I do understand if the man confirms their bias, their dislike of some Americans, etc., that folks will look the other way and ignore the signs of a con job, but having to give up a basic, common sense lesson of what we all should learn growing up, namely“you can’t trust everyone”, is strange…
Because he plays to peoples prejudices. A lot of Americans hate blacks, immigrants, and working women. Playing to their grievances, especially to those who are bored to death with their success (but feel slighted or aggrieved, especially when social media tells them how to feel) is a winning strategy for Trump or any demagogue.
IMG_5580.jpeg
 
Back
Top