Search results

3 and 5 would be incredible but also sorta funky. You dont really take VJ and Tre I dont think. So then you take the Ace risk and pick him and Tre I would think. Or VJ and Kon.......anyway.

Those are the 3 you are riding for this draft cycle then?

This is my fav time of draft season where you sprinkle a positive comment about 64 prospects so you can bump it 6 years later. That's not sarcasm. I genuinely think its a hilarious bit and I see you, you ole motor boating son of a bitch.

Youre now taking credit for Fleming? Wild scene.

French Giannis

Noa Essengue. Bookmark this.

Im gonna have to take a half day just to prep.

Go on.....

I have no idea one way or the other, but why are you continuing to assume its WAS? I am assuming its BKN but only because of "geographical advantage".

Malauch isn’t a bad prospect for like 6-7 playoff teams for a great add off the bench. My takes have always been in relation to us, or any non-playoff, early lottery team. For those teams, there are just so many better upside swings.

Yeah I think that’s a very different deal but I don’t hate that framework at all, especially with it being JC and not Sexton. That’s a much more balanced deal to take on PG. Then the hope is you can rehab his value but that gets tricky with trying to tank. But I digress….

As in we move from 5 to 3 and get a future first for taking on PG?

Beringer for me for sure.

1000% It would rival Azubuike for me

This. That's a lot of gymnastics to end up with a bad fit, bad contract and the same tier of player had you just stayed at 5

Put that on your resume.

Don’t put Taylor in that group.

in a redraft they will.

They already look dumb AF now. Dude is going to be a guy every team in the league will want.

Thats not an article. Its a collection of quotes from another real article and a few comments from the comment section. Journalism.