and then went for a dumb foul against RJ 5 sec later when he had no chance at contesting, with 4 fouls and 11 min to play. He hasn't been good at D, and that's ok. He was matched up against a very good pg, but he has also commited some unnecesary fouls and now is on the bench
he is struggling on defense, just got two dumb fouls in 10 seconds. It's fine to say he is playing well on offense while struggling on d. He had to be substitutes because he is about to foul out
If you can call "major win" to dump a former 2nd overall pick for 2nds that then you use to re-acquire a player you had the season before. Yup, major win.
what the hell Dok....lol
I've never seen a player in the post abandon his defensive position to get a steal, giving a clear path to the basket. Truly dumb
I think the idea of trading for him is to get his bird rights. Of course, this requires some understanding between the team trading for him and the player's camp about resigning
I'm wondering if they are also waiting Toronto's next move. The team missing out on OG or FVV him might end up overpaying for Conley, JC, Vando or Beasley (hello Lakers, Clippers, Knicks, Suns, Pelicans, etc)
I'm interested in seeing Lauri or Kessler production with Conley vs Sexton as ballhandlers running Pick N Roll. Or TO's percentage or hockey assists. Anyway, regardless of stats, I think the Jazz plays much better with the ball in Conley's hands (or him off ball). Basic stats as plus minus or...
I see you point. I just think that you need high IQ players who are capable to make advanced reads, especially at the highest level (playoffs). And having a good PG helps so much. The Jazz is night and day with/without Conley. But he is old and declining and I don't think any of the other...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.