Search results

I’m going to be in the minority no doubt, because even though it’s easy to see that Gobert has the bigger impact than anyone else, I still voted to remove him from the equation if that’s what we have to do, because he also has far and away the biggest impact on our roster building ability...

Jazz are 7-8 this season sans Gobert (Mostly sans Mitchell) Jazz are 5-3 this season sans Gobert but with Mitchell playing

likely true, and unfortunately if our $200M man isn’t spoon fed possessions < 2 ft from the rim this happens

I don’t think don is an elite distributor, but judging him solely by his assist total is futile while he’s playing within this offense. Ricky Rubio, the 3 seasons prior to Utah, averaged 9 apg. That dropped to about 5 and a half in 2 seasons with Utah. (Also about what Don is averaging)...

Cracked me up

Nah, i'm proposing we dont pay **anyone** 46M unless they are those guys (which we wont get). And in this hypothetical you're not painting the full picture. Whiteside without Gobert, but not replacing Gobert with anything? Yeah we might be a little worse, but the Jazz did go 5-0 with Whiteside...

Just to keep the dialog alive Player A) 16.4p | 15.4r | 3.0b | 23.3reb% | 7.2blk% | +11.1 net rtg Player B) 17.4p | 16.6r | 2.5b | 25.1reb% | 6.0blk% | +9.4 net rtg Who you taking? Keep in mind one of them is making 35 million, and 46M in a couple years (which, to be frank, is preventing the...

7th in the league in net rating too (Ahead of Gobert) Him and Rudy are #2 and #3 in rebounding. One costs 2.4M and the other costs 35M Looking at this salary chart is so depressing. We are seriously going to be on the hook for paying 46M for a 34 year old Gobert?

When he’s engaged*, he gives you at least 90% of what Gobert gives you, while taking up only 1.2% of our cap%** * he’s not always engaged ** Gobert takes up 24% of our cap%, and will take up far more than that in the coming seasons

Where can we find how many double digit 4th quarter leads we’ve blown this year? Feels like a lot

How was this dude -4 +/- in 17 minutes, in a game which we led by 51 points…?

To be fair, individually, he’s been struggling much more than one bad game. In the Jazz’s last 10 games, Mike is averaging 8/5/3 on 30%/29% shooting.

Is this the same as saying the perim defense has suffered since Rudy returned? Can’t remember if they went hand in hand

Crazy thing is, Rudy Gobert has been negative in plus/minus in 7 of his last 9 games… The last 4 have been -27 -5 -15 And -12 tonight While Whiteside was positive in 8 of his last 9… The last 4 have been +20 +10 +19 And +17 tonight Donovan positive in 7 of last 9 Something interesting is...

Dame is close for me at least. He was quite dominant from 17-21 (28/7/5 over that span), and has 6 all nba selections (7 if you count the weird Covid season), including a first team selection. If his teams could have had better post season success he would be a no brainer.

Less than a month ago he won nba player of the month LMAO. short memories round here

I think Deron was objectively a top 10 player in the league for multiple seasons. Apples to oranges

That’s a reflection of Q’s offense more than anything else… hell Ricky Rubio had a career average of 8.3 assists per game at that point of his career and that dropped way down to 5 with the Jazz. Donovan is a pretty willing passer. That’s far from his biggest issue.

And just as the church used it’s tithing payers to gobble up $100 Billion in real estate assets, will Gobert use his to gobble up baskets or will he gobble up turnovers and awkward turnarounds?

I mean, the light has to get yellow at some point, right? the dude had 20 shots in 21 minutes last night. On the wrong night (we've had plenty), meaning if he's off, it's pretty hard to overcome that sort of volume and pace.