Search results

The anticipation must be killing him: https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=201736&page=83&p=10497539&viewfull=1#post10497539 "I think I'm about to get banned here. https://jazzfanz.com/threads/holy-pi...3#post-2027878 Let's see what happens." Cosmo, mad as a box of frogs.

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/best-candy-bar-worst-photos_n_4004468 Number 1. Never heard of it. Twix or Boost does it for me.

Whatever. Put us both on ignore if it bugs you. If your forum owner is ok with a serial forum spammer posting his BS, he surely must be ok with somebody showing it as such. If the noise continues from him, so will the debunks. The notion that lies need to be answered is nothing new and me...

Laugh at this clown calling everyone a shill. No pretence Is needed. I covered the traits of the Apollo rocks, you were too clueless to understand and posted your debunked crap youtube garbage and of course ignored the informed responses given. I just proved it was in a vacuum - your pathetic...

It isn't a debate. It's a lying spammer repeating his spam and lies and ignoring the supplied evidence. Take it elsewhere? Your forum allowed this fool to spam here even when he has done so at 100+ other forums. Why should people who care allow this clown to post unanswered BS? I refer you...

And the crazy spammer diverts from the falling lid with his noted above insane "credibility test". http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com/2011/07/chinese-spacewalks-part-1.html Here is Cosmo's claim of the object being a bubble: It's a bit of ice, bubbles simply do not do that, look like...

I am using his information - it kicks your butt. I also have my own and stuff from various other debunking places that you are afraid to read. It takes colossal stupidity to look at that spacewalk and suggest it is in a water tank. You ignored his analyses of the idiotic videos you referred...

He posts from Madrid. I am based in the UK. Go read my post, no names were called. I said his opinion was less than smart. If you are all concluding that I am him, you really should use your heads a bit more.

There is no terrestrial weathering on any of the samples. Basically the samples show no interaction with standing water, atmospheric water, atmospheric gases or any vegetation or animal. This is completely impossible to fake with an Earth rock. The samples are loaded with a whole host of solar...

How about you keep your unbelievably idiotic opinion to yourself. I actually find that quite insulting considering I actually despise the guy's behaviour.

Does it now, you crazy serial forum spammer who knows nothing about any of this. Your opinion is worthless. I've shown you a screenshot of what it is actually like under the lid!! You are clearly trolling as usual. IT'S FLAT!! It's flat as can be seen by the picture! It's also irrelevant...

The static is massively increased in a vacuum both in charge and frequency. https://www.universetoday.com/10830/static-electricity-in-space/

I think it comedy gold that you cower away from admitting air displaced by a falling lid will move dust mere inches away, whilst spamming the crap out of the internet suggesting an astronaut 6 feet away will move a damn flag! You don't even understand basic physics.

Here it is slowed right down - your claim is nonsense - you can actually watch as the arc moves towards the ground in PERFECT unison: Here again John Young jumping up on the Moon: Number 3: This shows a clear parabolic arc of dust between John Young's boots that is 100% irrefutably rising and...

Explain it then! As usual any excuse to post your favourite spam subject.

An absurd claim from you.....it's almost comedic. Bouncing dust?

The parabolic arc moves in the same way and speed as his jump. Unless the dust is on a wire you are lying - just for a change! Every single thing you post is getting completely destroyed, how can you be that deluded not to see it??

Debunked spam. The animated gif above completely closes the case. The reflection disappears when a narrow rod moves in front of it. Again, the blog you completely ignore tears your claims to shreds. http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com/2011/07/superlight-contention.html

You disgraceful spammer. You have no intention of reasoned debate. Now you make one clueless association and use it as an absurd generalisation then suggest that your absurdity discounts the testimony of probably a thousand or so geologists who have studied the rocks...

This has been moved below because Cosmo has completely ignored it.