I haven't and I'm glad that a vaccine helped some people not get polio. No need to be an *** about the whole thing is all I'm saying. I guess all vaccines, without exception, have always been wonderful.
The scientific community sounds like a very broad concept to me. What exactly determines that a hypothesis is shared by the "scientific community" in general? Also, how do you assume that I haven't read all the links that I gave you? Actually I didn't, I've gone through a few because I don't...
Are you really this short sighted? What if Hillary wins against Trump via electoral fraud? Of course there are other things that need to be changed in the electoral system in order for anti establishment candidates to have a fair chance at being elected but the method for counting the votes...
Oh, the links. Here are a few sir:
https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/14/11/2227/pdf
https://mercury-freedrugs.org/docs/0810dd_GeierDAEtAll_AComprehensiveReviewOfMercuryProvokedAutismIndianJMedResOct2008_v128_383-411_1004.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/16512356/...
Also, any electronic device is subject to be hacked to manipulate the data. I say start with going back to paper ballot vote counting, with a representative from each party overlooking the process. It's how it's done in Spain and I've never heard of electoral fraud over there. It's quick too...
Good video, I don't dislike the concept. I hate the fact that he uses labels like "centrist" and "extremist" candidates though, I'd like to know what he means by this. He also assumes that this system would favor the more, in his words, centrist candidates.
Those are very broad labels, being pro-vax or anti-vax. Some vaccinations have been proven to cause autism while others have improved our life expectancy. It's not a black or white issue.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.