What's new

Message to Matthews lovers

But viny is right. We disagree and the issue has been rehashed ad nauseum. Your inability to admit a single flaw and your constant, seriously non-stop, harping on how he made us a better team and how wonderful he is and how he is the second coming of whatever, invites argument and eventually scorn and pity.

You don't even realize that I'm making two separate arguments. The first one is that Boozer is better than Jeffersuck/Millsap. The second one is that last years team is better than this years. The only thing defensively that Jeffersuck/Millsap have on Boozer is that they jump higher. They don't get a lot of steals though. It's not Boozer's fault he gets hurt a lot, but at least he's not Grant Hill, McGrady, Penny Hardaway, etc. Jeffersuck/Millsap rarely get points in transition, hell it seems like this whole team rarely gets them anymore, but that's not solely due to the loss of Boozer. Boozer also got to the line and drew fouls on the other team, better finisher, AND ONE. It's not even close. The fact is, Jazz fans everywhere had Jefferson pegged better than Boozer as soon as we signed him. Laughable.
 
Ok, I dont think Bozzer is necessarily better than Jefferson...though at this point it looks like he is. Now that that is out in the open...now what? You are wholeheartedly correct that Bozzer is not at fault for being made out of glass. But, really, that's besides the point...isn't it? It's the reality that matters and the reality is that Bozzer is incredibly injury prone. Now what?

Again, you've completely missed MY point. Why do you keep railing about it? Why do you have a fundamental need to hear that your position is the correct one?
 
Again, you've completely missed MY point. Why do you keep railing about it? Why do you have a fundamental need to hear that your position is the correct one?

For the same reason that you kept mentioning, in multiple game threads, that this seasons team was better because our record was better.

That good enough for you?
 
For the same reason that you kept mentioning, in multiple game threads, that this seasons team was better because our record was better.

That good enough for you?

That is no longer the case, so I have not mentioned that in quite a while. So, no, that is not good enough for me. That said, my mentioning of that specific claim pales in comparison to your Bozzer proclamations all over this board. I mean, keeping things intellectually honest, you'd have to admit that to an outsider you look like someone who has a clear agenda here on Jazzfanz.

Furthermore, my claims of comparable records were mostly made in reaction to your posts...just sayin'.
 
Furthermore, my claims of comparable records were mostly made in reaction to your posts...just sayin'.

But you've mentioned it in game threads multiple times.

People like to say that I was 'nowhere to be found' if Boozer had a bad game. They bumped my Boozer thread with joy. Now here I am. NOW WHAT??????????????
 
But you've mentioned it in game threads multiple times.

People like to say that I was 'nowhere to be found' if Boozer had a bad game. They bumped my Boozer thread with joy. Now here I am. NOW WHAT??????????????

Exactly. Now what? You've made your position regarding Bozzer crystal clear. So where do we go from here?
 
Exactly. Now what? You've made your position regarding Bozzer crystal clear. So where do we go from here?

I have no clue, good thing it's not my job to decide. I would have never extended Memo, at least at that price. I would have also pulled the Trigger on AK for marion in 2007. KOC has a huge mess to clean up.
 
I have no clue, good thing it's not my job to decide. I would have never extended Memo, at least at that price. I would have also pulled the Trigger on AK for marion in 2007. KOC has a huge mess to clean up.

This is a post from you Sloanfeld that I completely agree with. Of course hind sight is alway 20/20 they say.
 
That is no longer the case, so I have not mentioned that in quite a while. So, no, that is not good enough for me. That said, my mentioning of that specific claim pales in comparison to your Bozzer proclamations all over this board. I mean, keeping things intellectually honest, you'd have to admit that to an outsider you look like someone who has a clear agenda here on Jazzfanz.

Furthermore, my claims of comparable records were mostly made in reaction to your posts...just sayin'.


I stand in awe of your phenomenal post. Truth has never been more succinct. The bible is a pile of garbage by comparison.
 
Why don't you guys go back to your TRAILBLAZERS board already? All you do is post about Matthews. Geez, get over it already!

6a00d8345657f469e20147e13ea167970b-500wi.jpg
 
Why don't you guys go back to your TRAILBLAZERS board already? All you do is post about Matthews. Geez, get over it already!

Just to show chitownjazz how it's done, THIS thread was an example of satire. Of course, some people didn't get it...

The irony is just... yeah.

That reply, even came roughly ten posts after I explained the point of this topic:

You missed the point entirely. People keep telling me to go to a Bulls board because I keep talking about Boozer, but they don't say that to all the Matthews lovers, which is what I'm trying to point out.

So yeah, that's how you do it, bitches.


WHO CAN STOP SLOANFELD?????????????????
 
That last response is how Sloanfailed turns him getting owned into him owning, by simply changing around the entire thread in a single post to fit his delusions. He is a legend in his own mind.
 
That last response is how Sloanfailed turns him getting owned into him owning, by simply changing around the entire thread in a single post to fit his delusions. He is a legend in his own mind.

Are you a slow learner? Re-read this topic, it's pretty clear that I was tired of the Boozer haters telling me to go to a Bulls board while the Matthews guys get a free pass. You are one typical liberal, that's for sure.
 
Back
Top