Johnson stroking it. He has a simple form, nothing too complicated, I think he can be a consistent shooter at the next level if he continues to play within himself.
I thought Walt Perrins comments on 1280 last week were very interesting. Particularly when he spoke about bringing in guys that would fit into the existing lockeroom and not upset the good chemistry that is forming.
I don't know how personalityis scouted or evaluated, especially by armchair guys like us. Another reason why I'm not going to get my hopes up for any particular player.
I thought Walt Perrins comments on 1280 last week were very interesting. Particularly when he spoke about bringing in guys that would fit into the existing lockeroom and not upset the good chemistry that is forming.
I don't know how personalityis scouted or evaluated, especially by armchair guys like us. Another reason why I'm not going to get my hopes up for any particular player.
I thought Walt Perrins comments on 1280 last week were very interesting. Particularly when he spoke about bringing in guys that would fit into the existing lockeroom and not upset the good chemistry that is forming.
I don't know how personalityis scouted or evaluated, especially by armchair guys like us. Another reason why I'm not going to get my hopes up for any particular player.
If that is true, for where we're picking it looks like Winslow, Looney and Booker would be great picks.
Johnson and Oubre not so much.
actually I have a back ground in psychology this one of the things I look at.
lmfao
If that is true, for where we're picking it looks like Winslow, Looney and Booker would be great picks.
Johnson and Oubre not so much.
Because Johnson and Oubre have more alpha in them?
I just think the other 3 mentioned have more of a team first attitude.
Thats what I meant. More content to be a 3rd option. Which is not a bad thing.