What's new
By:

Following potential 2015 draftees

R J Hunter shoots below 30% from college 3's and doesn't look remotely like an NBA player to me. Also looks to have limited upside given his physical/athletic limitations.


I would be VERY surprised if the Jazz trade down to grab him.
 
If a trade down is possible I'd rather have it be for 16 or 17 and net us another first rounder and I'd likely target Booker, Lyles, or Looney. I don't like Hunter either, but some people smarter than I am do like him. His dad is cool doe.
 
BENTLEY said:
I'm srs. I like Looney.
Click to expand...

He's intriguing... I like the pick at 19 better than 12 for sure.

I think if Turner is available where we pick if we don't love him (and I don't... long term fit is a bit awkward) Milwaukee and Boston will both have a big interest in moving up... I'd use them against each other and see what I could get.

I still like the idea of 12 and Booker for 10 and McBob... at 10 we just need one team to reach on a player (Charlotte with Booker or Detroit with Frank) and we get Johnson or Porzingis. I think Miami would do it as well as they value the ability to bring in FA over other team building methods. They want enough space next year to retain their guys and get Durant.
 
ONE LOVE said:
R J Hunter shoots below 30% from college 3's and doesn't look remotely like an NBA player to me. Also looks to have limited upside given his physical/athletic limitations.


I would be VERY surprised if the Jazz trade down to grab him.
Click to expand...

35% from 3 from his career on a good number of attempts. I wouldn't like the trade, but please try to be factually correct instead of the spin you're trying to use here. I mean, unless you were one of the types to say Hayward was a below 30% shooter from 3 in college.
 
ONE LOVE said:
R J Hunter shoots below 30% from college 3's and doesn't look remotely like an NBA player to me. Also looks to have limited upside given his physical/athletic limitations.


I would be VERY surprised if the Jazz trade down to grab him.
Click to expand...

Take the shooting percentage out and this sounds exactly like Steph Curry lol.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
He's intriguing... I like the pick at 19 better than 12 for sure.

I think if Turner is available where we pick if we don't love him (and I don't... long term fit is a bit awkward) Milwaukee and Boston will both have a big interest in moving up... I'd use them against each other and see what I could get.

I still like the idea of 12 and Booker for 10 and McBob... at 10 we just need one team to reach on a player (Charlotte with Booker or Detroit with Frank) and we get Johnson or Porzingis. I think Miami would do it as well as they value the ability to bring in FA over other team building methods. They want enough space next year to retain their guys and get Durant.
Click to expand...

If we got McBob and Johnson for Booker and 12, I'd ****ing cream. I like Booker a lot, but sheesh, that'd be great.
 
NAOS said:
If we got McBob and Johnson for Booker and 12, I'd ****ing cream. I like Booker a lot, but sheesh, that'd be great.
Click to expand...

btw, this is mainly because I really want Johnson. Not for McBob, necessarily. Do most people think McBob is better than Booker? I'm not so sure...
 
NAOS said:
btw, this is mainly because I really want Johnson. Not for McBob, necessarily. Do most people think McBob is better than Booker? I'm not so sure...
Click to expand...

this is the second consecutive time I'm quoting my own post. Hotttnickkk tells me this is a Facebook Taboo, but I don't give a ****.

STANLEY JOHNSON
 
NAOS said:
this is the second consecutive time I'm quoting my own post. Hotttnickkk tells me this is a Facebook Taboo, but I don't give a ****.

STANLEY JOHNSON
Click to expand...

I like McBob a lot. He's decent on defense and is a good shooter/passer. Would be great if healthy. But yeah the prize would be SJ.
 
orangello said:
He'd be better at moving the ball within the offense.
Click to expand...

I think I agree with you. But Booker wasn't a slouch as far as that is concerned. His passing skills go underrated around here. And, he knows his place within the system.

Would anybody be surprised if Booker shot 4% better from 3 next year (only the second year he'll be shooting that shot)? That'd put him north of 38%. He's a good piece. I hope he doesn't leave unless it gets us Johnson (or maybe a falling Porz).
 
NAOS said:
I think I agree with you. But Booker wasn't a slouch as far as that is concerned. His passing skills go underrated around here. And, he knows his place within the system.

Would anybody be surprised if Booker shot 4% better from 3 next year (only the second year he'll be shooting that shot)? That'd put him north of 38%. He's a good piece. I hope he doesn't leave unless it gets us Johnson (or maybe a falling Porz).
Click to expand...

He needs to shoot it more for me, but yeah he is a good player, leader, and knows his role. Decent passer and sometimes his energy changes games. He also hate him some Enes Kanter. His contract makes it a 50/50 proposition that he gets moved imo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top