Probably could've said the same thing a year ago about Burke.
Nah, kind of different projecting the improvement of a rookie of the year winner to Trey Burke.
Probably could've said the same thing a year ago about Burke.
Someone once told me that 3 assists shows that lack of court vision doe
Call that the kanter effectCongrats.
The team was also losing a **** ton of games during that period.
Just don't really see a ton of scoring from his team especially in this competition.
Call that the kanter effect
His team would score fine.
A team with Parker, Wiggins, and Griffin would get buckets just fine.
In real life against the regular teams in the NBA, sure. But there are some teams with a ton of firepower in this and I don't see how they keep up with the lack of three-point shooting he has.
Parker, Wiggins, Green combined for 2.2 threes MADE a game last year.
I'm saying in this competition specifically how are they going to keep up especially when you can pack the paint against them?
Yeah, IDK why I even picked KAT, but I like him. I think he can clearly protect the rim at a NBA level and hit jump shots in the NBA. As far as projecting him, idk. I feel like he would be a plus contributor at a bench level for a playoff team by the end of the year.
Nah, kind of different projecting the improvement of a rookie of the year winner to Trey Burke.
You can't just pack the paint.
Parker, Griffin, and Wiggins are all good mid-range shooters for one thing. You don't have to shoot 3's to win the in the NBA. It is the trend, but it's not the only way. These are crafty and athletic scorers.
He can also easily sub in Smith for Green to add more shooting.
That logic seems foolproof.
Tell me the last team to win a title who couldn't shoot threes? Wtf bro seriously?
Burke finished third in rookie of the year voting. It's impossible to project someone who finished 3rd. Had he finished first, then every stat would have been perfectly projectable. Because, you know, magic.
You can't just pack the paint.
Parker, Griffin, and Wiggins are all good mid-range shooters for one thing. You don't have to shoot 3's to win the in the NBA. It is the trend, but it's not the only way. These are crafty and athletic scorers.
He can also easily sub in Smith for Green to add more shooting.
Burke finished third in rookie of the year voting. It's impossible to project someone who finished 3rd. Had he finished first, then every stat would have been perfectly projectable. Because, you know, magic.
Wiggins is clearly a very good player. Is anyone here going to argue that? He won ROTY because of that.
Burke clearly wasn't very good. He was in a class with a bunch of ****ty rookies. Him finishing 3rd was unique to that class.
I'm taking bets for people who don't think Wiggins will improve his 3pt percentage though if yall are that dumb.