What's new
By:

Official UofU homer thread

King Cy said:
Control was very questionable, from what I saw.
Click to expand...
This.
He used the ground to make the catch. (Pinned it to the ground)
 
KD's Framily said:
Has to be indisputable to overturn it.
Click to expand...
This is true and I hate the way they do replays.
I think they should look at the replay as of with fresh eyes and forget the call on the field and just try to simply get the call right.
 
To me its dumb to watch the replay and think "I'm 95% sure that was a fumble but since I'm not 100% sure I guess we have to go with the call on the field"
 
fishonjazz said:
To me its dumb to watch the replay and think "I'm 95% sure that was a fumble but since I'm not 100% sure I guess we have to go with the call on the field"
Click to expand...
Be honest though, if the call was questionable, yet benefitted your team, you'd be happy. If they're not sure, they're not sure.

Sent from my LG-D851 using Tapatalk
 
I think the logic behind it is you can't reverse a subjective judgment call with another subjective judgment call.

Which is easy to dispute, but regardless, under the rules, it was a subjective call and they were correct not to overtturn it.
 
RobDMB said:
Be honest though, if the call was questionable, yet benefitted your team, you'd be happy. If they're not sure, they're not sure.

Sent from my LG-D851 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Oh for sure. If that same play happened and byu was the team that made the int then I would be saying "we got away with one there, thankfully"
 
KD's Framily said:
I think the logic behind it is you can't reverse a subjective judgment call with another subjective judgment call.

Which is easy to dispute, but regardless, under the rules, it was a subjective call and they were correct not to overtturn it.
Click to expand...
I can agree with that.

But as for the general way they do replays, I think the call on the field is much more subjective due to the speed and angle of the call on the field.
The replays provide much better looks at the play and therefore I think they should just scrap the call on the field and look at the replays and figure out what they think the right call is
 
fishonjazz said:
I can agree with that.

But as for the general way they do replays, I think the call on the field is much more subjective due to the speed and angle of the call on the field.
The replays provide much better looks at the play and therefore I think they should just scrap the call on the field and look at the replays and figure out what they think the right call is
Click to expand...

Good point. I agree.
 
Want to talk about the refs screwing a team over, THAT is screwing a team over. Should've been offsides and a Utes first down.
 
The pass rush for the utes has been consistently good all night
 
That knee is really close to being down.
I legit can't tell
 
That's a coin toss in my eyes
 
Booker is awesome
****ing workhorse
 
I'm legitimately wondering how many interceptions Goff has to throw before these commentators finally stop slurping him.
 
Got away with a little pass interference there.
Good win by Utah
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top