What's new

Now that the Jazz suck again

Sloanfeld

Banned
Let's focus on getting OBAMA out of the white house in 2012. I told you guys last time, some of you didn't listen. Don't screw it up this time.

TRUMP 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDlOAu_Sv5g

Now, normally I would say something awesome like, Trump is like the Carlos Boozer of politics, but realistically...

TRUMP >>>>>>>>>>>>>> BOOZER
 
I would be embarrassed to be an American if Trump became our president. I'd take Romney over him in a heartbeat. Honestly I'll be perfectly happy if Obama stays in office. I think he's demonstrated that there is very little real difference between a Democrat or Republican in the white house. I'll start caring about politics when we have a legit 3rd party involved.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would be embarrassed to be an American if Trump became our president. I'd take Romney over him in a heartbeat. Honestly I'll be perfectly happy if Obama stays in office. I think he's demonstrated that there is very little real difference between a Democrat or Republican in the white house. I'll start caring about politics when we have a legit 3rd party involved.

You would be embarassed? SO YOU'RE NOT EMBARASSED NOW??????????????????? LOL!
 
No way. Obama has been light on all the medical pot clubs that have sprouted up in Colorado. He has my vote.
 
No way. Obama has been light on all the medical pot clubs that have sprouted up in Colorado. He has my vote.

We're a FAILED nation economically with Trillions in unfunded obligations loaded on our children, and you're voting for pot?

God I hope this was said with some heavy sarcasm. . . . .not that I think the FedGov should be regulating natural plants. . . . .

The one thing I give Obama credit for is being favorable to the restoration of competitive markets in the beef/pork/poulty and other Ag commodity markets, where cartel giants have been having their way because there's been no enforcement of anti-Trust laws and in fact the Dept. of Agri has been "owned" by the "interests" meaning the very big cartels.
 
I sincerely believe that Sloanfeld would rather the Jazz suck without Boozer (and now D-Will) for no other reason than to be able to say he "won" a message board argument(s).
 
I am unsure how the Jazz sucking now is any different than them sucking for the month before D Will left.
 
We're a FAILED nation economically with Trillions in unfunded obligations loaded on our children, and you're voting for pot?

What your solution? Neither party is talking about the ramp job wall street did on this country.
 
We're a FAILED nation economically with Trillions in unfunded obligations loaded on our children, and you're voting for pot?

God I hope this was said with some heavy sarcasm. . . . .not that I think the FedGov should be regulating natural plants. . . . .

The one thing I give Obama credit for is being favorable to the restoration of competitive markets in the beef/pork/poulty and other Ag commodity markets, where cartel giants have been having their way because there's been no enforcement of anti-Trust laws and in fact the Dept. of Agri has been "owned" by the "interests" meaning the very big cartels.
I'm not only voting for pot. I don't believe the Executive office has much of an effect on the economy, so I vote for them on their real effect of how they enforce the law.
 
What your solution? Neither party is talking about the ramp job wall street did on this country.

A lot of folks don't understand exactly how things work. Basically, some clever folks have been working the masses with bubble/bust cycles for a long time. The Tulip bubble in Europe several hundred years ago, for example. I think we have to take down the Federal Reserve, and throw some of folks at GoldmanSachs in jail. These are perhaps the central offenders, though there are a lot more. No way should we be bailing out the banks and leaving the clowns who caused the problem being in charge of the fix.

Our major parties nowadays are both funded by the same people, that's why they do the same things. Well, at least in substantial issues like splitting the take.
 
I'm not only voting for pot. I don't believe the Executive office has much of an effect on the economy, so I vote for them on their real effect of how they enforce the law.

Fair enough. You're right about the Pres. not being central to our prosperity. I view the office as something of an unsubstantial "figurehead" or honorary post. The Pres has to be player with the interests, or the hounds of the media will be all over him chewing him up. I have been extremely disappointed to see how our FBI and in general our Justice Dept is weighing in on crime.

For example, I had enough information to send a judge to jail along with a candidate for governor, and the FBI had just set up shop in that place with a great press about how they were there to investigate corruption. They did a sting on five or six judges caught taking bribes, but when I called, the investigator just stiffed me. Wouldn't even take the information. One of the principal beneficiaries of the crime was a Justice Dept. officer. They let the fatcats do whatever they want, and throw every nickle and dime pot merchant in the clink for years.
 
For example, I had enough information to send a judge to jail along with a candidate for governor, and the FBI had just set up shop in that place with a great press about how they were there to investigate corruption. They did a sting on five or six judges caught taking bribes, but when I called, the investigator just stiffed me. Wouldn't even take the information. One of the principal beneficiaries of the crime was a Justice Dept. officer. They let the fatcats do whatever they want, and throw every nickle and dime pot merchant in the clink for years.

You must live in Pennsylvania.
 
Back
Top