Am I dumb to even think this is a debate?
Am I dumb to even think this is a debate?
I've thought about it.....
Devin ****ing Booker son.
Booker > Wiggins.
Back to back 30 point games in his rookie year at age 19. Has that ever been done?
I've thought about it.....
Devin ****ing Booker son.
Booker > Wiggins.
Back to back 30 point games in his rookie year at age 19. Has that ever been done?
LOL. ... I do like your honesty.Trade up for Murray. He's better than Booker.
fixedLOL. ... I do like your delusions.
I'd probably go with Wiggins. Both are young, both have different strengths, but I'd probably gamble on Wiggins getting more accurate. That would help him out so much opening up driving lanes. Also when the T-Wolves acquire better spacing over the years, that will help him create more high accuracy looks around the basket.
Wiggins also has the defensive capabilities to balance his overall impact.
Wiggins doesnt have Booker's killer mentality. Wiggins is going to step aside and let KAT be the leader. Booker is going to take the leadership.
Wiggins doesnt have Booker's killer mentality. Wiggins is going to step aside and let KAT be the leader. Booker is going to take the leadership.
Devin Booker is a baller. He's also very young. There are different ways his game can develop, and he can finish at the rim better than you'd think.
That said, Wiggins can defend, rebound and get an open look anytime he wants. Is he a #1 option? Maybe not, but as a second option, he's pretty cool.
Booker is a good player on a bad team. I need to see more of him before I compare him to Wiggins' potential.