So what you're saying is you know her more than she knows herself?
Let's not nickel and dime me, OK. I think I know everyone better than they know themselves, you most of all.
why the hell do you think I live in this cave?
So what you're saying is you know her more than she knows herself?
I have yet to see a single situation where the cheating spouse did not start setting up a plan for their future in case they got caught, or once they decided to leave. I'm involved with a project that has to do with exactly this type of situation. Once they begin cheating on their spouse they always start justifying that it's okay in this particular situation. The spouse didn't earn enough money, or didn't tell them they were pretty enough, or something else. And once they do this they start looking out for themselves. They are no longer in a partnership so from their perspective it's okay to spend family money on themselves, to sabotage their spouse, etc. I could tell some nightmarish stories about this.
The really bad part is that the spouse who is being cheated on probably doesn't imagine that anything is going on, so while the cheater is processing the change and coming to terms with what it means in the arms of a new lover, the spouse who was loyal is going to get hit by a Mack truck and feel almost completely alone in the world, just like the OP.
Was she determined to be the primary care provider? Did she fight for custody? If not it doesn't surprise me that you won. Otherwise, what you are saying does not match what I've seen at all.Not true. My ex was mildly using a drug and I got our child. Fast and easy. Now Itah does unfairly lean towards the mother but it's not an un winnable battle.
Let's not nickel and dime me, OK. I think I know everyone better than they know themselves, you most of all.
why the hell do you think I live in this cave?
Was she determined to be the primary care provider? Did she fight for custody? If not it doesn't surprise me that you won. Otherwise, what you are saying does not match what I've seen at all.
In any state the woman always has a huge upper-hand but that doesn't mean he couldn't win custody. Stoked's already used his own example to show that. To throw one's hands up and not try is sad imo. Also, maybe she will be the bigger person and relinquish custody to him knowing he's a good man. It doesn't mean she couldn't see them, even a lot. It just means she's aware he's a more stable figure in their lives and better for them.
More importantly, he should try to save his marriage because there appears to be love there? Getting drunk and banging a dude is a mistake. Getting drunk once every year and banging a chick are mistakes. Having clarity and choosing to see some rich dude for six months isn't a mistake. It's an affair that she consciously participated in time and time and time again because of how it made her feel. If she stays with her, she won't learn **** from it. She'll do it again. And again. And again. And their relationship will suffer which will affect the kids. One stable single-parent home is much better for kids than a dysfunctional duel-parent home. Research has shown this.
Not sure why you're telling me this.
I quoting this because of the expression "duel-parent". It's gonna become a cliché someday.
I quoting this because of the expression "duel-parent". It's gonna become a cliché someday.
Should've said two-parent methinks.
Poor Alexander Hamilton.
Huh?
Why'd you change from Burr to Hamilton?
Read your post which I responded to. My first sentence was in direct response to what you said. The rest followed from there.Not sure why you're telling me this.
Read your post which I responded to. My first sentence was in direct response to what you said. The rest followed from there.
I already ackowledgeed to GF that I fully see how a person would or does do this. But again, that doesn't make them Satan.
Not sure why you're telling me this.I already ackowledgeed to GF that I fully see how a person would or does do this. But again, that doesn't make them Satan.