What's new
By:

Following 2016 potential draftees

fishonjazz said:
I never said we should sign anyone lol. I also wanted the jazz to pass on jimmer at 12 if he would have been there. They are not similar though size imo. I do agree however that they had similar stats though. Good job sigh!
Click to expand...

They're not similar sized? Lmao. Curry is 3/4" taller and has an inch smaller wingspan.
 
#bern said:
They're not similar sized? Lmao. Curry is 3/4" taller and has an inch smaller wingspan.
Click to expand...
I guess it depends on your definition of similar. So hield has the longer wingspan by an inch and curry is less than an inch taller.

It's David and goliath lol
 
#bern said:
You were talking about Jimmer, fish. You said that Jimmer and Steph aren't similar sized.
Click to expand...
Oh I didn't know they were that close.
Good comp
 
Jamal Murray sucks.

Also, I've never seen him play.

But I feel he sucks.

I have shallowly categorized him and placed him in a box, and he's in the box that says he sucks. He's good btw, but as a super high pick, he definitely sucks. So says the box. Perhaps she'll get bumped and shamed by the ill-endowed. That may or may not exclude me.
 
LazyD said:
Jamal Murray sucks.

Also, I've never seen him play.

But I feel he sucks.

I have shallowly categorized him and placed him in a box, and he's in the box that says he sucks. He's good btw, but as a super high pick, he definitely sucks. So says the box. Perhaps she'll get bumped and shamed by the ill-endowed. That may or may not exclude me.
Click to expand...

Go back into hiding.
 
Dr. Jones said:
Here's the thing.

I wouldn't trade Gobert, Favors, or Hayward, for ANYONE in this draft, straight up.
Only reason I pick on Hayward is his max contract and his term.
Makes a ducking difference.
Click to expand...

Agreed, don't think the idea that the idea that is a weak draft has gotten around to be everybody yet but yeah this draft is pretty weaksauce.
 
Dr. Jones said:
Go back into hiding.
Click to expand...

I understand, fella. My mom will always think I'm a better man than I truly am (god bless the slow-pitch softballer).

Regarding Murray's box placement, his status as a former UK student-athlete is entirely irrelevant. I'm an equal opportunity Sorting Hat in that sense. The discriminations come from elsewhere. Imagine Jamal Murray trying to score on Gordon Hayward. Next, imagine the Jazz tarding Hayward for teh 3rd pick and drafting Murray.

Do you think God hides too?
 
Dr. Jones said:
Here's the thing.

I wouldn't trade Gobert, Favors, or Hayward, for ANYONE in this draft, straight up.
Only reason I pick on Hayward is his max contract and his term.
Makes a ducking difference.
Click to expand...

I see. Sorry. You can disregard a bit of my post.
 
LMAO wouldn't trade
Gobert, Hayward or Favors for Brandon Ingram, HAHA, Yeah who needs a scorer that can get his shot at anytime and over most people... Some homerism in this thread now.
None of those guy are ever going to be go to scores. Ingram can.. This is insane, wouldn't trade one of them for anyone in this draft. That's why the Jazz stay out playoffs and into lottery. Because how many playoffs series won with Hayward and Favors as the " Go to" Guys?

That's what I thought
 
Dr. Jones said:
Here's the thing.

I wouldn't trade Gobert, Favors, or Hayward, for ANYONE in this draft, straight up.
Only reason I pick on Hayward is his max contract and his term.
Makes a ducking difference.
Click to expand...
You're not giving Simmons enough credit.

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
 
Interesting debate.

First bentley i like you man. Stay strong

As for hayward i would love to see what they can get this offseason and do. Ddr i think would be a great compliment to hayward.

With that said if the jazz decided to trade hayward i think he is worth more than just the 3rd pick. There would need to be one of bostons 2017 pick.

The jazz draft murray. With the 12th pick the best big available. Let us assume skal for arguments sake.

In the offseason i would target barnes. I think that he can be a very solid piece and could give the jazz similar production to hayward.

Exum, mack, neto
Murray, burks maybe switch depending on burks health
Barnes, hood, ingles
Favors, lyles, zipser
Gobert, withey, skal or other big at 12

I like barnes and he knows what it is like to win.
 
Crocodile Dante said:
Interesting debate.

First bentley i like you man. Stay strong

As for hayward i would love to see what they can get this offseason and do. Ddr i think would be a great compliment to hayward.

With that said if the jazz decided to trade hayward i think he is worth more than just the 3rd pick. There would need to be one of bostons 2017 pick.

The jazz draft murray. With the 12th pick the best big available. Let us assume skal for arguments sake.

In the offseason i would target barnes. I think that he can be a very solid piece and could give the jazz similar production to hayward.

Exum, mack, neto
Murray, burks maybe switch depending on burks health
Barnes, hood, ingles
Favors, lyles, zipser
Gobert, withey, skal or other big at 12

I like barnes and he knows what it is like to win.
Click to expand...

That team is worse than what we have right now.
 
As some of you know, college coaches are not permitted to talk about recruits they're after.. not who they're going to see.. no details, etc.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
 
#bern said:
I don't think Hayward is that easily replaced tbh. There really aren't any good two way wings in this draft, and all the ones in free agency are poor versions of Hayward.

Again, on a team with an average pace, he's pretty much a 21/6/4 guy that plays really good defense. If we could sign a free agent like that, everybody would go nuts. Since he's here, people don't like him.

We had the 5th best point differential in the West without even an average PG, and our best defensive player injured for quite a while. What more was Hayward supposed to do?
Click to expand...

The Jazz need more high end talent. Trading away a player with Hayward production and hoping that two or more players can replace that, is not building towards a championship.

People should stop trying to water down the team.
 
orangello said:
The Jazz need more high end talent. Trading away a player with Hayward production and hoping that two or more players can replace that, is not building towards a championship.

People should stop trying to water down the team.
Click to expand...

No one is advocating "getting rid of" Hayward.
But losing him to another team is a reality we have to consider.
Get something good or nothing at all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top