What's new
By:

Baton Rouge Police Killing a 37-year-old black man at point blank range

Tom Pitt said:
Boris, after shooting him 2 times point blank in the chest, I'm pretty sure it would not be too difficult for two cops to subdue this man.

To shoot him 4 more times... After a 3-4 second pause. You'd have to be crazy not to think that's a bit excessive.
Click to expand...

Cops are taught to unload on gun toaters. Shooting him once was justified than shooting six times or 600 was.

Aside, do you have the coroners report? I see one death shot to the head. I read "shot shot shot shot" on the screen. I do not see or hear 4 more shots.

I pray for the officers mental wellbeing an for his family. I pray for the souls of those wishing harm or even worse death penalty on this innocent man for protecting and serving.
 
tfivas said:
If you don't want to get shot than comply, not saying the officer wasn't wrong here but when you resist you deserve whatever you get.
Click to expand...
I didn't see the Minnesota dude resisting. In fact, he was sitting in his car.
 
Boris said:
Cops are taught to unload on gun toaters. Shooting him once was justified than shooting six times or 600 was.

Aside, do you have the coroners report? I see one death shot to the head. I read "shot shot shot shot" on the screen. I do not see or hear 4 more shots.

I pray for the officers mental wellbeing an for his family. I pray for the souls of those wishing harm or even worse death penalty on this innocent man for protecting and serving.
Click to expand...

You must be a total idiot or douche. You can clearly hear 5 shots. The cop is a murderer and deserves death penalty for abusing his position as officer. Why multiple shots to the chest and the back? Shoot once in the arm, leg or whatever, disable , do not kill. Yet he meant to kill. So he deserves whatever highest penalty that state allows. Be it a death penalty for all I care, may set a good example for every other trigger happy cop.
 
fishonjazz said:
I didn't see the Minnesota dude resisting. In fact, he was sitting in his car.
Click to expand...

Read up on that shooting and that cop needs to go prison for life, apparently he told the cop he was licensed to carry and was told to grab his license.
 
MVP said:
You must be a total idiot or douche. You can clearly hear 5 shots. The cop is a murderer and deserves death penalty for abusing his position as officer. Why multiple shots to the chest and the back? Shoot once in the arm, leg or whatever, disable , do not kill. Yet he meant to kill. So he deserves whatever highest penalty that state allows. Be it a death penalty for all I care, may set a good example for every other trigger happy cop.
Click to expand...

I believe you deserve the death penalty for jumping to conclusions by ordering a potentially innocent man to his death.

Society needs to start holding people accountable for there rash decisions. Maybe that will stop these riots.
 
Boris said:
Society needs to start holding people accountable for there rash decisions.
Click to expand...

First smart thing you said in this thread - this cop made a rash decision to murder a man - needs to be held accountable right?

Boris said:
I believe you deserve the death penalty for jumping to conclusions by ordering a potentially innocent man to his death.
Click to expand...

Lol, you seriously are a biggest dumbass on this site. Potentially innocent? What other proof you need after watching the video? Dude kills man from point blank range while his partner is holding him down. It is murder, execution, slaughter, whatever you want to name it - you can't seriously think this dude who pulled the trigger 5 times is innocent. They both are actually absolutely incompetent - what kind of training they received if two of them can't handcuff a man on the ground?
 
Boris said:
I believe you deserve the death penalty for jumping to conclusions by ordering a potentially innocent man to his death.

Society needs to start holding people accountable for there rash decisions. Maybe that will stop these riots.
Click to expand...

1c677a7494da0ea482588add7daec77f.jpg
 
MVP said:
First smart thing you said in this thread - this cop made a rash decision to murder a man - needs to be held accountable right?



Lol, you seriously are a biggest dumbass on this site. Potentially innocent? What other proof you need after watching the video? Dude kills man from point blank range while his partner is holding him down. It is murder, execution, slaughter, whatever you want to name it - you can't seriously think this dude who pulled the trigger 5 times is innocent. They both are actually absolutely incompetent - what kind of training they received if two of them can't handcuff a man on the ground?
Click to expand...

You call hesitating and demanding the suspect put down his firearm is rash? Go bring me your rope
 
MVP said:
First smart thing you said in this thread - this cop made a rash decision to murder a man - needs to be held accountable right?



Lol, you seriously are a biggest dumbass on this site. Potentially innocent? What other proof you need after watching the video? Dude kills man from point blank range while his partner is holding him down. It is murder, execution, slaughter, whatever you want to name it - you can't seriously think this dude who pulled the trigger 5 times is innocent. They both are actually absolutely incompetent - what kind of training they received if two of them can't handcuff a man on the ground?
Click to expand...
I was with you until you said shoot in the arm or leg. There is no circumstance when police should shoot to disable. First, gunshots are potentially lethal no matter where you aim. Second, you should never fire you gun unless you are in eminent mortal danger, so you should never have time to think about that and aim at an appendage. And those shots have a much greater chance of missing entirely, which increases the chance that they hit someone or something else. And gunshots aren't very good at stopping someone by hitting their arm. Third, firing your gun is done to stop the threat, which is best and most reliably accomplished by shooting center mass, which means chest.

Boris is an idiot, especially on this topic. I'm with you there. And I agree that the officer should be charged with murder.
 
You can just 'Like' it.



'Like' is the new Rep nowadays... kinda like cell phone vs pager, CD vs cassette tape, ...
 
White people offering advice like "just don't resist and things will be fine" need to stop. It's so obvious at this point that the issue goes far beyond that.

As a white person raised in Utah who can count on two hands the number of black friends Ive ever had, and "knows" about black culture from the Internet and TV, my first instinct when hearing about stuff like this shouldn't be to offer a critique, but to be moved with sympathy first and foremost.

There is a real problem, and as a white person, I'm in learning mode with all of this, not critique mode.
 
The Daily News is a ****ing cesspool of journalism. Seriously, have some respect for the ****ing family.
 
tfivas said:
If you don't want to get shot than comply, not saying the officer wasn't wrong here but when you resist you deserve whatever you get.
Click to expand...

Why don't resisting white people deserve to get shot?

Link 1

OK, sometimes they do, but black people are five times more like to be killed when they are not attacking the police, and carry no gun:

Link 2
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top