Of course I avoided the question. Your comment, and question, demonstrated that the point of the article went right over your head. The writer was pointing out, in a very eloquent manner, why blacks viewed police shootings of blacks in an entirely different manner then black on black crime. He was not biased at all. He even said, nobody had to agree with the reasons blacks felt that way, but that it was important that people at least understand those reasons. As, quite obviously, neither Rudy Giuliani nor yourself do understand. Unfortunately, you are too biased, and too angry at anybody who disagrees with you, to understand the point of the article. You are full of blind hatred, so far as I can tell, and I had no intention of steering the conversation back to your desire to demonize people who don't agree with your bigoted mind set.the writer made an honest, balanced, effort to explain police on black violence and black on black violence are not equivalent, and instead you chose to see if you can find some way to denigrate and attack his comments. You did not deserve a follow up answer from me, or anyone else who's willing to hear different opinions. You're a bigot, and advance your bigotry. I had no intention of allowing you to steer that article into still another attempt by you to demonize people you don't agree with. He's biased because he thinks only some place shootings are justified?? Why not just read his words and actually make an effort to understand his point? Was that really asking too much of you?
You are do blinded by hatred, you can't even understand an effort to bridge the gap between the polarized sides. But, no surprise to me.
