What's new

Call Your Shot (Presidential Race)

Not the best source. As advocates for globalism, thus contrary to the idea of national sovereignty, it is not in the CFR's interest to give Donald Trump a good name.

Either way they are direct quotes or links to the direct quotes from him there.
 
Here is another one with the same info. But less on foreign policy. If you want to read it.

https://www.ontheissues.org/Donald_Trump.htm

Well maybe I'm wrong about him. I just want the best for this country. I mean I certainly know that Hillary isn't the answer either. If I end up giving Trump a vote of confidence (hopefully being the "outsider" that he claims to be) and we end up even worse I will gladly eat crow.
 
Last edited:
Why does national sovereignty depend on a 35% tariff?

Trump claims that it will discourage businesses from exporting jobs to China for cheaper labor. We're talking about a tariff issued from one country to another, from the US to China, aside from any global agreements like NAFTA that have caused this situation in the 1st place, to bring more money and jobs into the US. National sovereignty, the ability to make decisions of our own that go in our favor.

But go ahead, place your opinion, I respect your opinion on foreign affairs.
 
Well maybe I'm wrong about him. I just want the best for this country. I mean I certainly know that Hillary isn't the answer either. If I end up giving Trump a vote of confidence (hopefully being the "outsider" that he claims to be) and we end up even worse I will gladly eat crow.

Im not trying to talk you out of voting for him or for voting Clinton either. Just wanting to get facts about both out there.
 
Im not trying to talk you out of voting for him or for voting Clinton either. Just wanting to get facts about both out there.

And I appreciate that, I try to keep an open mind about things and I like reading other people's opinions.
 
Trump claims that it will discourage businesses from exporting jobs to China for cheaper labor. We're talking about a tariff issued from one country to another, from the US to China, aside from any global agreements like NAFTA that have caused this situation in the 1st place, to bring more money and jobs into the US. National sovereignty, the ability to make decisions of our own that go in our favor.

But go ahead, place your opinion, I respect your opinion on foreign affairs.

Both opening ourselves up to the world and closing ourselves off are decisions that we can make. It's our prerogative. I don't think that choosing to engage with the world through trade is us giving up our national sovereignty.

As far as making stuff in America is concerned. How much more are you willing to spend? How much are you willing to go without because you can't afford it? Yeah, we will get some jobs back but there will be less stuff and it will cost more. That's the flip side.
 
Both opening ourselves up to the world and closing ourselves off are decisions that we can make. It's our prerogative. I don't think that choosing to engage with the world through trade is us giving up our national sovereignty.

As far as making stuff in America is concerned. How much more are you willing to spend? How much are you willing to go without because you can't afford it? Yeah, we will get some jobs back but there will be less stuff and it will cost more. That's the flip side.

I'm looking for someone to point the way to my fully-automated future.
 
I'm looking for someone to point the way to my fully-automated future.

Siro brought this up a while back and I think that he is right in that we are going to need to provide a guaranteed basic income when automation becomes ubiquitous.
 
My original post in its entirety: [MENTION=2931]Jamezz[/MENTION] What do you think about the quoted part of the above post? You have always seemed to think the usa should stay out of other countries business (me too).

Broncster said that trump will go to war with anyone who disagrees with him and be a bully to other countries. I wanted to know what jamezz thought of that. You quoted me and brought up how reagan went to war and the outcome was good. What am I to think your point was with that? I figured it meant that reagan wanted to go to war and that turned out good so if trump wants to go to war then it will turn out good too.

I still have no idea what your reasoning for bringing up reagan in relation to my post was.

You have turned into the biggest troll on jazzfanz. Congrats.
 
You have turned into the biggest troll on jazzfanz. Congrats.

I dont think you know what the word troll means. Just because people call you that doesnt make it a compliment. A better compliment for Fish would be: Best dude on Jazzfanz or maybe biggest bad *** on Jazzfanz. Eh those are a little cheesy but gives you an idea of compliments you can try out. By the way maybe you should ask someone what troll means before calling someone that who doesnt come close to fitting that definition and embarrassing yourself.
 
Back
Top