Maybe this will get the thread back.
Thread: Reputation Comments,...
for defending Stickler
I got this neg for "defending Stickler" without defending Stickler.
Good stuff
For the record he really isn't necessarily wrong. That was my interpretation of the matter, but when it was discussed nobody made mention of whether the "die" part or the "homo" part was the more offensive part. Together it just seemed like a total douchebag sort of comment and everyone saw it for what it was.
Jazzfanz has two sets of rules, one for Sloanfeld, and one for everyone else.
Seriously, who can stop me???????
LOL!
I was being facetious about the Lesbian part, but either way the two statements don't mesh. In one you insinuate women are shallow gold diggers who will have sex with a wealthy man at the drop of a hat, and in the other you say that feelings and affection are vital to their sex lives. At least make sense while blaming women for your lack of a sex life.
Baby, I find you really hard to read sometimes.
Sorry. I'll try harder not to say the obvious.
Are you ashamed of me, babe?
So then what's against the rules? Die? Homo? Douchebag comments? (<-everyone would be banned, so obviously not). The comment is still there, so I guess you didn't do anything. I supposed if somebody else reported it the proper action would have been taken.
Like I said,
Try harder? Maybe you should just try.
I deserved this one.
I deserved this one.
What are you, a slut?? Or a guy which is what I mostly suspect. Give it up.
What was against the rules is that it was a particularly malicious comment. It was so obvious there was no debate about it. Since it was my turn to issue the infraction, I put why I thought it went over the line. The rules are what they are. If they aren't specifically listed the idea is to use your own judgment and anything reported gets voted on.
What comment is still where?
I just can't please everyone. I got neg repped for agreeing with Marcus. Maybe by Marcus, who knows.
Considering that I was indulging in some fairly lame "humor" saying stuff I was admitting was "obvious", and agreeing that in fact it would be more appropriate to "just try" rather than "try harder" not to say the obvious. . . .
hmmm. . . . maybe it was VO who has demonstrated incisive confusion about the meaning of my convoluted logic.
But whoever, since you seem to be sincere. . . . yes, I am a slut in the whole posting career here in JazzFanz. A slut trying to be "nice" to everyone, prostituting my potential mind that could being doing some very critical thinking about how to bring all the other posters up to some ideal in logic or maybe even politically correct normative standard of behavior. Yes, that's it. If only I could be like you, the ultimate chatforum intellectual cop passing out tickets to all who fail of my perfect comprehension of all things.
And thanks for you insightful and civic-minded message. Perhaps you should run for city council where you can help write more laws on how long the grass should grow.
If it makes you feel any better I will. God knows when it will be, but based on my diet, weight, and stress level it may be sooner than I hope.YOU = SHOULD DIE
I don't see how that's any less malicious than me saying 'DIE HOMO'. But I guess the mod squad has degrees of macliciousness of which some merit warnings and some don't.
If it makes you feel any better I will.
And yes, there are no specific rules on how one can wish for death upon another. Just general rules on trolling which we get to vote on. That's why we get paid the zero big bucks for the job.
Sloanfeld said:Jazzfanz has two sets of rules, one for Sloanfeld, and one for everyone else