What's new

Reputation Comments, positive and negative

For the record he really isn't necessarily wrong. That was my interpretation of the matter, but when it was discussed nobody made mention of whether the "die" part or the "homo" part was the more offensive part. Together it just seemed like a total douchebag sort of comment and everyone saw it for what it was.

So then what's against the rules? Die? Homo? Douchebag comments? (<-everyone would be banned, so obviously not). The comment is still there, so I guess you didn't do anything. I supposed if somebody else reported it the proper action would have been taken.

Like I said,

Jazzfanz has two sets of rules, one for Sloanfeld, and one for everyone else.
 
LOL!

I was being facetious about the Lesbian part, but either way the two statements don't mesh. In one you insinuate women are shallow gold diggers who will have sex with a wealthy man at the drop of a hat, and in the other you say that feelings and affection are vital to their sex lives. At least make sense while blaming women for your lack of a sex life.

You're missing the key point. The wealthy (and fame and power for that matter) part makes up for the feelings and affection and all the other crap that women tend to need before they will have sex. Men will have sex at the drop of a hat for the most part. It's nothing against either sex, it's just how we are biologically wired.

And there are plenty of other reasons out there that contribute to my lack of a sex life (my ex-gf living in the same house I do doesn't help), but honestly, gay men don't have the same issue straight men do. They have sex all the time (if they want) because that's how men work.
 
Are you ashamed of me, babe?

I know you are trying to use sarcasm to make a point about the so-called humor in 'net death wishes, just dishin' it back. And I dunno what VinO is up to except I think generally he would think those wishes are not really classy or good taste, and yet he's having some trouble figuring out if you are actually just as classless as those you are taunting.

I'd just ask you not to even pretend to be as low-rent as that.

Sorry Trout, we just didn't realize this was your thread.
 
So then what's against the rules? Die? Homo? Douchebag comments? (<-everyone would be banned, so obviously not). The comment is still there, so I guess you didn't do anything. I supposed if somebody else reported it the proper action would have been taken.

Like I said,

What was against the rules is that it was a particularly malicious comment. It was so obvious there was no debate about it. Since it was my turn to issue the infraction, I put why I thought it went over the line. The rules are what they are. If they aren't specifically listed the idea is to use your own judgment and anything reported gets voted on.

What comment is still where?
 
I deserved this one.

I deserved this one.

I just can't please everyone. I got neg repped for agreeing with Marcus. Maybe by Marcus, who knows.

What are you, a slut?? Or a guy which is what I mostly suspect. Give it up.

Considering that I was indulging in some fairly lame "humor" saying stuff I was admitting was "obvious", and agreeing that in fact it would be more appropriate to "just try" rather than "try harder" not to say the obvious. . . .

hmmm. . . . maybe it was VO who has demonstrated incisive confusion about the meaning of my convoluted logic.

But whoever, since you seem to be sincere. . . . yes, I am a slut in the whole posting career here in JazzFanz. A slut trying to be "nice" to everyone, prostituting my potential mind that could being doing some very critical thinking about how to bring all the other posters up to some ideal in logic or maybe even politically correct normative standard of behavior. Yes, that's it. If only I could be like you, the ultimate chatforum intellectual cop passing out tickets to all who fail of my perfect comprehension of all things.

And thanks for you insightful and civic-minded message. Perhaps you should run for city council where you can help write more laws on how long the grass should grow.
 
What was against the rules is that it was a particularly malicious comment. It was so obvious there was no debate about it. Since it was my turn to issue the infraction, I put why I thought it went over the line. The rules are what they are. If they aren't specifically listed the idea is to use your own judgment and anything reported gets voted on.

What comment is still where?

YOU = SHOULD DIE

I don't see how that's any less malicious than me saying 'DIE HOMO'. But I guess the mod squad has degrees of macliciousness of which some merit warnings and some don't.
 
I just can't please everyone. I got neg repped for agreeing with Marcus. Maybe by Marcus, who knows.



Considering that I was indulging in some fairly lame "humor" saying stuff I was admitting was "obvious", and agreeing that in fact it would be more appropriate to "just try" rather than "try harder" not to say the obvious. . . .

hmmm. . . . maybe it was VO who has demonstrated incisive confusion about the meaning of my convoluted logic.

But whoever, since you seem to be sincere. . . . yes, I am a slut in the whole posting career here in JazzFanz. A slut trying to be "nice" to everyone, prostituting my potential mind that could being doing some very critical thinking about how to bring all the other posters up to some ideal in logic or maybe even politically correct normative standard of behavior. Yes, that's it. If only I could be like you, the ultimate chatforum intellectual cop passing out tickets to all who fail of my perfect comprehension of all things.

And thanks for you insightful and civic-minded message. Perhaps you should run for city council where you can help write more laws on how long the grass should grow.

I always voted for 3 1/2 inches (from soil level of course). This still makes a nice trim appearance, but is long enough that it holds in moisture and allows you to use less water to keep the lawn nice and green.
 
YOU = SHOULD DIE
If it makes you feel any better I will. God knows when it will be, but based on my diet, weight, and stress level it may be sooner than I hope.

I don't see how that's any less malicious than me saying 'DIE HOMO'. But I guess the mod squad has degrees of macliciousness of which some merit warnings and some don't.

Well one of the differences is that I will not report it, seeing that I don't really care and all (although I cannot stop someone else who wants to step in and preserve my honor by reporting it). And yes, there are no specific rules on how one can wish for death upon another. Just general rules on trolling which we get to vote on. That's why we get paid the zero big bucks for the job.
 
If it makes you feel any better I will.

I wasn't telling you to die, I was posting the feedback comment that was left for me.

And yes, there are no specific rules on how one can wish for death upon another. Just general rules on trolling which we get to vote on. That's why we get paid the zero big bucks for the job.

Proving my point yet again...

Sloanfeld said:
Jazzfanz has two sets of rules, one for Sloanfeld, and one for everyone else
 
I got this rep. Which was not bad. Except it was a red rep. I think they did it on accident.

Dude nice post. Can't stand the milsap appologists

This was in response to a post about my belief that Jefferson is better than Millsap.
 
Back
Top