What's new
By:

Michael Moore : "Trump is Human Molotov Cocktail being thrown into political system".

Computer said:
www.washingtonexaminer.com/michael-...m-as-a-human-molotov-cocktail/article/2603400


I love this analogy of what Trump is to Trump supporters. "Trump is Human molotov cocktail being thrown into political system".


Thinking that Trump supporters are all just a bunch of stupid "deplorables" is naive. There are a lot of intelligent and good people that that will vote for Trump. And they can see what his faults are, but will vote for him anyways.
Click to expand...

Did you actually read the article you posted or can you only read binary strings 00101000011101101101001010000111110001111000111000000000001110101110111000001.
 
For someone who "doesn't support trump" op sure seems to support trump quite often.
 
fishonjazz said:
For someone who "doesn't support trump" op sure seems to support trump quite often.
Click to expand...

How would calling him a molotov cocktail be defending him. Its actually admitting he is a complete mess.

See and hear what you want I guess. Its your world. We are just living in it.
 
Computer said:
How would calling him a molotov cocktail be defending him. Its actually admitting he is a complete mess.

See and hear what you want I guess. Its your world. We are just living in it.
Click to expand...

I saw another part of your post talking about trump supporters being good intelligent people who see his flaws and vote for him anyway.

Kind of looks like supporting trump by supporting those who support him. Just how it came off to me.
 
Computer said:
How would calling him a molotov cocktail be defending him. Its actually admitting he is a complete mess.

See and hear what you want I guess. Its your world. We are just living in it.
Click to expand...

I think it is a great metaphor and has nothing to do with Trump being "a complete mess".

Trump might actually be a complete mess, but by focusing on his personal morals ( or whatever causes you to call him a mess) you are missing the bigger picture. We are witnessing a great awakening, a seismic shift in the political discussion in this country. Trump didn't start it, he has only rode the wave. Bernie road the same wave of discontent before The system removed him. His supporters didn't stop believing in revolution.

When Moore says Trump is a Molotov cocktail, I think he is saying Trump represents the tool in the hands of an angry mob that is America, and has the ability to burn down the old political house.

The Revolution that started with the Arab Spring is spreading, we live in interesting times.
 
mellow said:
I think it is a great metaphor and has nothing to do with Trump being "a complete mess".

Trump might actually be a complete mess, but by focusing on his personal morals ( or whatever causes you to call him a mess) you are missing the bigger picture. We are witnessing a great awakening, a seismic shift in the political discussion in this country. Trump didn't start it, he has only rode the wave. Bernie road the same wave of discontent before The system removed him. His supporters didn't stop believing in revolution.

When Moore says Trump is a Molotov cocktail, I think he is saying Trump represents the tool in the hands of an angry mob that is America, and has the ability to burn down the old political house.

The Revolution that started with the Arab Spring is spreading, we live in interesting times.
Click to expand...

I agree with that.

I think that Trump being mess though does correlate some with the term molotov cocktail. Maybe Moore didnt mean that when he said it, but he did just say it recently I believe. So it works even more now that his craziness has stepped it up a notch.

But ya, I agree it means more of what you are saying. The thing has just been lit though and it is getting more serious now.
 
fishonjazz said:
I saw another part of your post talking about trump supporters being good intelligent people who see his flaws and vote for him anyway.

Kind of looks like supporting trump by supporting those who support him. Just how it came off to me.
Click to expand...

Ya, I have no problem defending people who support Trump. I would defend people who suppory Hillary too. Even though I dont have any respect for her and dont like her.

Just because anyone would vote for either doesnt make them the same person or a bad person. I think its foolish to believe so.

I bet you have someone in your family like maybe your grandparents that you have respect for and are probabaly voting for him.
 
Computer said:
Ya, I have no problem defending people who support Trump. I would defend people who suppory Hillary too. Even though I dont have any respect for her and dont like her.

Just because anyone would vote for either doesnt make them the same person or a bad person. I think its foolish to believe so.

I bet you have someone in your family like maybe your grandparents that you have respect for and are probabaly voting for him.
Click to expand...
True. (Even though I don't have any grandparents.... But I get what you are saying)
 
Computer said:
Ya, I have no problem defending people who support Trump. I would defend people who suppory Hillary too. Even though I dont have any respect for her and dont like her.

Just because anyone would vote for either doesnt make them the same person or a bad person. I think its foolish to believe so.

I bet you have someone in your family like maybe your grandparents that you have respect for and are probabaly voting for him.
Click to expand...

lol
 
Computer said:
Ya, I have no problem defending people who support Trump. I would defend people who suppory Hillary too.
Click to expand...

Please find me one time you've defended Clinton in recent months because while you sit up on your perch here and proclaim objectivity, the number of times you've denounced "liberals" is far too many to count. The number of times you've truly criticized Trump or Republicans (I'm not counting your criticism of the their approach as a party which is completely different) on the other hand can be counted on one hand and from what I recall, that's probably being generous because I quite frankly don't remember one criticism in that direction.
 
Last edited:
Cunning Linguist said:
Please find me one time you've defended Clinton in recent months because while you sit up on your perch here and proclaim objectivity, the number of times you've denounced "liberals" is far too many to count. The number of times you've truly criticized Trump or Republicans (I'm not counting your criticism of the their approach as a party which is completely different) on the other hand can be counted on one hand and from what I recall, that's probably being generous because I quite frankly don't remember one criticism in that direction.
Click to expand...

Blah blah blah. How do you turn supporting HC or Trump supporters in to demanding computer support HC? You are being trite.

Liberals love to do this. I do not remember you asking Jonah Red JJAS an Gameface this same question with reversed names. Double standard.
 
Boris said:
Blah blah blah. How do you turn supporting HC or Trump supporters in to demanding computer support HC? You are being trite.

Liberals love to do this. I do not remember you asking Jonah Red JJAS an Gameface this same question with reversed names. Double standard.
Click to expand...

Hey, don't take this the wrong way but please **** off.
 
Back to the OP. I do think there is some element of this. It won't explain all his voters or why his numbers are lower than the last couple R nominees but it did play its part.
 
Stoked said:
Back to the OP. I do think there is some element of this. It won't explain all his voters or why his numbers are lower than the last couple R nominees but it did play its part.
Click to expand...
Weird how this is still out there and presented as fact. Trump’s numbers were lower than McCain’s and Romney’s on election night but that’s only because all the votes had yet to be counted. Trump (61. 2 million) has easily surpassed McCain (59.9) and is now past Romney (60.9). With a few million more votes still to count Trump will actually come close to Bush’s total (62 million) in 2004 for most votes ever cast for a Republican candidate.
 
Jonah said:
Weird how this is still out there and presented as fact. Trump’s numbers were lower than McCain’s and Romney’s on election night but that’s only because all the votes had yet to be counted. Trump (61. 2 million) has easily surpassed McCain (59.9) and is now past Romney (60.9). With a few million more votes still to count Trump will actually come close to Bush’s total (62 million) in 2004 for most votes ever cast for a Republican candidate.
Click to expand...

Last I had looked he was 2 million under McCain and Romney and he had won the election. I stopped looking at it after that, was unaware it had changed. Interesting.

Even more of a big middle finger than I had thought.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top