What's new

Was Trump inevitable due to American Universities?

LogGrad98

Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
Found this interesting...

https://nypost.com/2016/11/20/college-kids-are-proving-trumps-point/?ref=yfp

Small wonder, then, that a recent ACTA-commissioned survey found that less than half of college graduates knew that George Washington was the commanding general at Yorktown; that nearly half didn’t know that Theodore Roosevelt was important to the construction of the Panama Canal; that more than one-third couldn’t place the Civil War in a correct 20-year span or identify Franklin Roosevelt as the architect of the New Deal; that 58 percent didn’t know that the Battle of the Bulge occurred in World War II; and that nearly half didn’t know the lengths of the terms of US senators and representatives.
 

Those are sad numbers. Here is the full study if you want to look at it. Some of the questions asked in the survey were somewhat difficult and most people forget dates and details quickly after learning them unless you use them somewhat regularly.

https://www.goacta.org/images/download/A_Crisis_in_Civic_Education.pdf

Even within that study and other studies the college graduates answers are more correct than non college graduates though.

Most of that article is a little silly though. A lot of extreme or outlandish examples to make an attention grabbing point.

https://www.snopes.com/yale-cancels-midterms-after-students-were-upset-by-trumps-win/

Although I do expect some great news from a Murdoch tabloid paper.
 
Trump was inevitable due to right-wing radio and uneducated Americans.

Duck Dynasty and Honey Boo Boo America has taken over.
 
Those are sad numbers. Here is the full study if you want to look at it. Some of the questions asked in the survey were somewhat difficult and most people forget dates and details quickly after learning them unless you use them somewhat regularly.

https://www.goacta.org/images/download/A_Crisis_in_Civic_Education.pdf

Even within that study and other studies the college graduates answers are more correct than non college graduates though.

Most of that article is a little silly though. A lot of extreme or outlandish examples to make an attention grabbing point.

https://www.snopes.com/yale-cancels-midterms-after-students-were-upset-by-trumps-win/

Although I do expect some great news from a Murdoch tabloid paper.

Granted the article is a little silly but those examples are real things happening in legitimate universities. Kind of mind boggling actually. And they aren't isolated, it's happening a lot.
 
Granted the article is a little silly but those examples are real things happening in legitimate universities. Kind of mind boggling actually. And they aren't isolated, it's happening a lot.

Why teach real history when your goal is to scare kids in to thinking global warming is goin to destroy the planet an that there is no differences between men an women?
 
I hadn't seen this posted yet. Another article on the creation of Trump.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/how-the-left-created-donald-trump-214472

On Nov. 8, it appears, the right decided it finally had enough of this smugness. Conservative voters—including many former working-class Democrats who made the difference in key states such as Pennsylvania and Wisconsin—sent the message that they’d had enough not only of losing economically, but also of being sneered at. Trump’s rise in popularity—and ultimately his election to the presidency—should be seen as a long-building reaction to grassroots liberal activism that came to dominate the cultural landscape and claim victory after victory in the social arena, whether the issue was abortion or gay marriage or transgender rights, always accompanied by that same disdain for right-wing views as worthy of the stone age. Trump’s rise to power evolved out of this frustration, as Clinton’s campaign increasingly became an extension of liberal America’s smug-style of debate—an attitude that no longer disputed on grounds of policy or intellectual differences, but on the issue of the integrity of the right altogether.
 
I hadn't seen this posted yet. Another article on the creation of Trump.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/how-the-left-created-donald-trump-214472

When I initially joined Jazzfanz more than 10 years ago, I was quite conservative. Many of the posters challenged my viewpoints and exposed me to different ways of thinking that were outside my insulated bubble. As I listened to my heart instead of what I had been told my whole life, my thinking changed dramatically. So thanks to social media for that. I have been guilty now, though, of feeling that I've evolved and my views are more enlightened, which inevitably leads to feeling those I've "left behind" are not as informed and aware as I now am. Smug, indeed. While I tend to not beat people over the head with my opinions too much, I haven't been completely proud of myself this election cycle. We are all in this together, and each person deserves respect.

Ugh, now I feel a little smug because I'm being so reasonable. It's hard to be a human.
 
What a crock of ****. Human rights=smugness? Of course anyone is right to question the integrity of those who suppress equal rights.

We read that very differently. I read it as the tactics were the issue in question, not the actual social issues themselves.
 
We read that very differently. I read it as the tactics were the issue in question, not the actual social issues themselves.

I agree. I'm not re-thinking my opinions on the issues themselves, other than my usual assessments. But I am re-evaluating the way I think of people who do not share those same opinions.
 
We read that very differently. I read it as the tactics were the issue in question, not the actual social issues themselves.

What tactics? Is it smug to view suppression of equal rights as "views worthy of the stone age"? I don't call that smugness. The point made by this author is ridiculous and if people assign smugness to those who value equal rights then that just highlights their own prejudice.
 
What tactics? Is it smug to view suppression of equal rights as "views worthy of the stone age"? I don't call that smugness. The point made by this author is ridiculous and if people assign smugness to those who value equal rights then that just highlights their own prejudice.

So either you read the article through HEAVILY colored glasses or you didn't read it. Fair enough. Don't let any other opinions get in the way of your dogma.
 
Here is a reasonable if somewhat heavy handed take on the tactics involved.

https://www.vox.com/2016/4/21/11451378/smug-american-liberalism

Finding comfort in the notion that their former allies were disdainful, hapless rubes, smug liberals created a culture animated by that contempt. The result is a self-fulfilling prophecy.

This hits the attitudes of my heavily left leaning friends spot on. Condescension and contempt.
 
Here is a reasonable if somewhat heavy handed take on the tactics involved.

https://www.vox.com/2016/4/21/11451378/smug-american-liberalism



This hits the attitudes of my heavily left leaning friends spot on. Condescension and contempt.

To be fair, there is plenty of contempt from either side toward the other.

I think its weird that there even are sides to the debate. Just seems to me like everyone would be in favor of equality.
 
Back
Top