What if this happened?

[Ron Mexico]

It looks like the Clinton camp has joined in on the recount push. I am glad they are looking more into this. I am also glad that the Clinton camp has said they are not doing this to contest the election and have stated they do not see signs of voter fraud. They are making sure the voter process is protected and that if there is a problem we can solve it before any future elections.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/26/...or-wisconsin-ballot-recount.html?ref=politics

 

[colton]

I remember it. It was different. Clinton has already conceded. Plus, that wasn't really an issue of voting irregularities it was about how difficult it was to count their ballot due to dimples and hanging chads. There was an issue with how confusing the "butterfly" layout of the ballot was. What they're looking into here is something possibly a little more malicious.

But as far as court challenges go, I suspect it was very similar to how this would go.

 

[Boris]

Standard bullying tactic from the left tbh.

Pretty much. Republicans accept defeat with grace cause we respect the process an rule of law. Democrats demand recounts an riot an murder police.

 

[Red]

Pretty much. Republicans accept defeat with grace cause we respect the process an rule of law. Democrats demand recounts an riot an murder police.

Here's The Donald accepting his popular vote loss with grace and maturity, lol...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...opular-vote-a-twitter-born-conspiracy-theory/

https://www.thedailybeast.com/artic...-s-false-cry-baby-election-recount-tweet.html

 

[LogGrad98]

Here's The Donald accepting his popular vote loss with grace and maturity, lol...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...opular-vote-a-twitter-born-conspiracy-theory/

https://www.thedailybeast.com/artic...-s-false-cry-baby-election-recount-tweet.html

I think it's pretty clear Donald us anything but a run of the mill republican.

 

[fishonjazz]

Here's The Donald accepting his popular vote loss with grace and maturity, lol...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...opular-vote-a-twitter-born-conspiracy-theory/

https://www.thedailybeast.com/artic...-s-false-cry-baby-election-recount-tweet.html

But that means nothing to boris cause boris doesn't see anything wrong with anything any republican does.

 

[Boris]

Here's The Donald accepting his popular vote loss with grace and maturity, lol...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...opular-vote-a-twitter-born-conspiracy-theory/

https://www.thedailybeast.com/artic...-s-false-cry-baby-election-recount-tweet.html

You retort with rag yellow journalism? Even the liberals hate Washington Post.

Now, when I say that Capehart is a liar, I don’t mean it in the pejorative sense. It’s not an ad hominem attack. It’s a fact, supported by the overwhelming weight of the evidence. In the journalism biz, a reputation for truth and accuracy is everything, and Capehart’s reputation is polluted by an extensive history of inaccuracies, journalistic spin and outright lies. His word processor is the beaker from which he regularly concocts a poisonous brew intended to sway the public toward his left-wing extremist ideology. Indeed, the Post’s liberal bias is better documented than Hillary Clinton’s cyber-crimes – and Capehart’s yellow journalism more known than her wayward hubby’s womanizing.

To be sure, Capehart’s agenda-driven shenanigans have the dubious distinction of managing to tick off both conservatives and liberals. Consider, for instance, that during the Democratic presidential primary, Capehart, who is “in the bag for Hillary Clinton, lock, stock, and barrel,” infuriated Bernie Sander’s supporters with a now-discredited missive that “progressive” Paste Magazine writer Shane Ryan called, “A dishonest narrative propagated by a supposedly neutral journalist, with perfect timing, in an attempt to smear Bernie Sanders.”

https://www.google.com/amp/townhall...o-credibility-n2202573?amp=true?client=safari

 

[Gameface]

So Trump didn't claim that the reason he didn't win the popular vote was voter fraud?

Just address the issue. In this case Trump's claim has been published by dozens of news outlets. The source posted here is not the issue.

 

[♪alt13]

You retort with rag yellow journalism? Even the liberals hate Washington Post.





https://www.google.com/amp/townhall...o-credibility-n2202573?amp=true?client=safari

Don't smear the WP. It's a good paper.

 

[fishonjazz]

You retort with rag yellow journalism? Even the liberals hate Washington Post.







So predictable.

 

[Boris]

So Trump didn't claim that the reason he didn't win the popular vote was voter fraud?

Just address the issue. In this case Trump's claim has been published by dozens of news outlets. The source posted here is not the issue.

What issue man? We know democrats are rigging elections. Bernie Sanders should be President Elect but the machine screwed us.

We know Chuck Hagel took over ES&S after Urosevich left an founded Diebold. Chuck Hagel then ran for senate an won on his machines calculating the votes.

We know democrats are catering to illegals an making a issue out of nothing for votes. We know they are playing the race card with ex-con blacks (even tho ex-con whites largely outnumber them an would overwhelmingly vote republican). We know they push amnesty laws an deregulated voter ID laws in several states (California).

So what if Trump calls a spade a spade.

 

[Boris]

Obama sold the voting machine rights to a George Soros company in 2008. Both the company an the CEO were maximum donators to Obama.

 

[Stoked]

Obama sold the voting machine rights to a George Soros company in 2008. Both the company an the CEO were maximum donators to Obama.

Then the people they paid to rig it might want to give the money back...