What's new

Donald takes a dump and accuses President Obama of wiretapping him

Trump has proven to be pretty much completely untrustworthy. Not only that but he defects responsibility for what he says to anyone or anything but himself once it is shown to be completely false. He's the President of the United States and the Commander-in-Chief of our military. When he speaks he needs to own what he says.

I'm afraid soon his stupidity is going to start costing lives.

oh, soldier boy here....

Bush and Obama were the ones who cost lives sending US troops to poop in foreign hell holes where we have no business just global fantasies of making the world white and delightsome.

Trump is no soldier, maybe he's a carnival side show huckster, but he's all business. He's actually more effective as world leader than either B or O. Trump says the obvious about North Korea, and China comes to the table talking "We can manage them". In effect, China has been enlisted to achieve US policy goals.... Might be some kind of genius in the method, but you won't learn about it from the Media.
 
Trump has proven to be pretty much completely untrustworthy. Not only that but he defects responsibility for what he says to anyone or anything but himself once it is shown to be completely false. He's the President of the United States and the Commander-in-Chief of our military. When he speaks he needs to own what he says.

I'm afraid soon his stupidity is going to start costing lives.

xstill the press has proven to be even more untrustworthy than that!

so i take his word over that of the press!


the rpes shas helped cover up every single obama scandal! and called his administration scandal free
 
notice how the globalist socialist fascist said no PHYSICAL wiretaps.
they did not say no wiretaps of any kind!


they are trying to pull a quick one!


ofcourse they wiretapped trump!

we live in an age where physical wiretap is not the only kind!

sooner or later the truth will come out
 
what lol.

why dont they say no wiretaps of any kind

lol, because no matter what you will try and defend him. Even when he is being stupid and wrong. Just like you will do anything to attack his predecessor, no matter what.

Politically hackery.
 
do you want globaism?

do you want unelected eu officials making laws and deciding the local laws and regulations?
do you want the unelected UN leaders dictate policy? like no private citizens owning guns, no freedom of speech? do you want those things?
wnat the un to outlaw private property for common folk?

i do not, if you want em ok that's on yo!

but globalism is just the 4th reich! and we all know how fun the 3rd reich was with socialism

I don't know about "isms". I just want whatever will reduce the likelihood of war between nations. I would like to see an end to the forces that divide humanity. Ultimately, I would love to see peace on Earth.

I'd like to see you have some peace of mind as well, since you sound very paranoid. And full of anger more often then not. I think some of the things you are worried about, and describe above, are in your own mind more then anywhere else.

The EU has complex issues to resolve. I would rather not see it fall apart, but I do recognize these are also issues Europeans do have to confront and deal with. I do not feel quite as qualified to speak for your issues as you have felt so free to comment on America's issues. My ancestors came from Europe, both Western Europe and Eastern Europe. And I recognize I am a product of Western civilization. But I won't presume to tell Europeans how to solve their problems. You, on the other hand, seem to have no problem telling Americans how to solve theirs.
 
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ll-comey-trump-russia-investigation/99411214/

WASHINGTON — Not since Watergate.

FBI Director James Comey delivered more than one bombshell at a rare public hearing of the House Intelligence Committee Monday. He said there was no evidence to back up President Trump's accusation that President Obama wiretapped Trump Tower during the 2016 campaign, joining congressional leaders and intelligence officials in discounting Trump's unsubstantiated claims.

What was more explosive, though, was Comey's matter-of-fact confirmation that the FBI is investigating whether Trump associates colluded with Russia in the effort by one of the United States' leading global adversaries to affect the outcome of the 2016 presidential campaign.

To be sure, the FBI in recent years has been drawn into investigations involving the top ranks of the White House, from Scooter Libby's leaking of a CIA operative's name during the George W. Bush administration to President Bill Clinton's relationship with Monica Lewinsky. But not since the Watergate scandal that forced President Richard Nixon to resign more than a half-century ago has there been an official investigation of such potential consequence.

"The charges involved are more serious than anything we’ve seen in recent decades," says political historian Matthew Dallek, a professor at George Washington University and author of Defenseless Under the Night: The Roosevelt Years and the Origins of Homeland Security. "That is far from a lone instance of an illegal leak or a president fudging the truth under oath about sex with a White House intern. While we obviously don’t know what evidence the FBI has assembled and whether anybody will ever be charged with a crime, the scope of the investigation appears to encompass at least several of Trump’s chief advisers and perhaps Trump himself."
 
notice how the globalist socialist fascist said no PHYSICAL wiretaps.
they did not say no wiretaps of any kind!


they are trying to pull a quick one!


ofcourse they wiretapped trump!

we live in an age where physical wiretap is not the only kind!

sooner or later the truth will come out

No, the "quick one" you speak of is Trump's diversionary tactic of bringing up the bogus wiretapping claim in the first place. Diversion via crazy tweets has been his MO for quite awhile now. We ought to all at least recognize that fundamental fact by now. You see, by going in this direction, you demonstrate that there is nothing that Trump says that you will not simply fall into lockstep behind him. If he tweeted tomorrow that the moon really is made out of green cheese, you would be weighing in here in fervent defense of that claim. You would insist that the moon must be made of green cheese. He has come up with more conspiracy tinged nutty claims then we can keep track of by now. Obama was not born in Kenya. Thousands of Muslims did not fill the streets of New Jersey cheering the collapse of the World Trade Towers. Ted Cruz's father was not involved in the murder of JFK. I could go on and on. When the boy cries wolf this many times, how are we going to know when he tells the truth? We're not, really. All he is doing is destroying the credibility of his office while he serves in it.
 
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ll-comey-trump-russia-investigation/99411214/

WASHINGTON — Not since Watergate.

FBI Director James Comey delivered more than one bombshell at a rare public hearing of the House Intelligence Committee Monday. He said there was no evidence to back up President Trump's accusation that President Obama wiretapped Trump Tower during the 2016 campaign, joining congressional leaders and intelligence officials in discounting Trump's unsubstantiated claims.

What was more explosive, though, was Comey's matter-of-fact confirmation that the FBI is investigating whether Trump associates colluded with Russia in the effort by one of the United States' leading global adversaries to affect the outcome of the 2016 presidential campaign.

To be sure, the FBI in recent years has been drawn into investigations involving the top ranks of the White House, from Scooter Libby's leaking of a CIA operative's name during the George W. Bush administration to President Bill Clinton's relationship with Monica Lewinsky. But not since the Watergate scandal that forced President Richard Nixon to resign more than a half-century ago has there been an official investigation of such potential consequence.

"The charges involved are more serious than anything we’ve seen in recent decades," says political historian Matthew Dallek, a professor at George Washington University and author of Defenseless Under the Night: The Roosevelt Years and the Origins of Homeland Security. "That is far from a lone instance of an illegal leak or a president fudging the truth under oath about sex with a White House intern. While we obviously don’t know what evidence the FBI has assembled and whether anybody will ever be charged with a crime, the scope of the investigation appears to encompass at least several of Trump’s chief advisers and perhaps Trump himself."

I don't like that. It is not charges it is allegations. That is why there is an investigation. They could very well find that there was no collusion.

Good, investigate it but we don't really know anything yet.

Edit: If it is found to have happened that is espionage and treason is it not?
 
How ironic would it be if the special prosecutor hired to lock Donald up is none other than Hillary Clinton?

I want trump's *** locked up. It's so clear that so many in his cabinet colluded with Russia. It's impossible that he didn't know if not direct this. I don't want this trash as president. It sets such a terrible precedent. Get his *** out
 
So far, Trump's dealings with Russia appear to be less concerning than Hillary's while selling privileges to foreigners outta her State Department post, receiving in exchange millions of dollars for her campaign funds or Clinton foundation political projects.

I have to stop short of calling Red out as a brazen liar, because perhaps he's just the stupid dunce who believes uncritically the trash he reads from extreme political sites whose literary product is extremely inconsistent in principle. Going from totally ignoring all of Obama's assaults on Constitutional limits to Presidential powers, to inventing fictional issues with Trump before there is any evidence or reason to be concerned. But at least, here in JFC, Red is among friends, mostly. Just the sort of friends who have a hard time actually being liberal about politics enough to tolerate different opinions.

We have a situation where, for the first time in American history.... well, since Lincoln, anyway.... there is a political faction that is powerful and influential that is actually trying to destroy citizen's right to transfer political power through the election process. Our "mainstream media" is owned by folks who think the government should belong to them, but American voters have rejected that claim.

In joining such a cause, Red is destroying his credentials as a law-abiding American committed to the peaceful political process.

During the campaign, the mainstream Media and the "Democratic" Party stirred up a stink about what Trump might do if he lost the election, figuring he would want a recount of the vote or would dispute the eligibility of voters, or the programming of the voting machines,and thus cast a shadow on the legitimacy of the Clinton victory. It sounded like the Dems thought Trump would mobilize the NRA as a sort of brown shirt troop to just take over the government. I interpreted his response as being more in the line of just asking for recounts, which is what Hillary and the Dems actually did, first thing.

But now the MSM and Dems have gone to the extreme in doing exactly what they declared no one should ever do, Obama and Hillary and Soros mobilizing paid violent activists and their supporters in the federal government and media, and trashing the electoral process for deciding political issues and ensuring peaceful power transfers between lawful contestants vying for public support in the elections.
 
How ironic would it be if the special prosecutor hired to lock Donald up is none other than Hillary Clinton?

I want trump's *** locked up. It's so clear that so many in his cabinet colluded with Russia. It's impossible that he didn't know if not direct this. I don't want this trash as president. It sets such a terrible precedent. Get his *** out

Hillary sure would take the job if we let her, or even if we don't. Fortunately, she's is practically an invalid. Trump apparently is not of a mind to prosecute her for her illegal abuses while in office as "First Lady" and later as State Dept chief selling her office for cash giving political and military advantages to our enemies.

Hillary and Bill approved technology transfers that boosted the Chinese air force and space program, and Hillary took millions for approving the Russian purchase of US nuclear resources.

Thriller, how you can turn it all upside down, or believe the political interests that are funding this attack on US constitutional government. Running with that pack is actually inconsistent with you being a school teacher. We pay you to be this kind of influence on a rising generation?

I hardly think Trump fails to understand the issues with Russia. His wife and in-laws can probably give him pretty good advice about setting limits and standing up to whatever inappropriate advances Russia may make, having suffered enough under Russian hegemony already.

Putin, while no real paragon of virtue or political benefactor of the people, does know what Hillary Clinton and the British/European interests have been doing towards fomenting anti-Russian public sentiment. I believe George Soros funded the tipover of Russia's former pocket toy ally, the Ukraine, and turning it into a NATO client. I believe western interests like Soros actually want to destabilize the world political climate to gain leverage over the local citizenry in various areas. Right now, we're playing chess on the geopolitical map. It may be the run up to a new Great War over the Mideast.

Trump is not the kind of man who would want that. Trump wants peace, want's to make businesses prosper in America, which sorta tilts him to try to find ways to keep peace everywhere. He has no investment in military production.....

If, as Red claims, he just wants peace, he should re-evaluate his reading list and maybe his opinion of Trump.
 
It's downright haunting how many repubs are totally down with Donald colluding with Russia for help. Thisnsets such an awful precedent. What next? Democrats cutting deals with china to win elections? France? Germany?

I'm so ashamed of half of this country. All they care about is party.

I want a president that isn't making a complete *** out of himself. I want a president who will stand for America and make us feel proud. It's too bad that now we have a reality tv star/Russian puppet who's just completely and utterly clueless.
 
How ironic would it be if the special prosecutor hired to lock Donald up is none other than Hillary Clinton?

I want trump's *** locked up. It's so clear that so many in his cabinet colluded with Russia. It's impossible that he didn't know if not direct this. I don't want this trash as president. It sets such a terrible precedent. Get his *** out

actually russia and podesta and others have links to russia!
 
Russia has links to russia? No way

lol hahaha.

sorry bout that. I meant Clinton and podesta.

clinton foudnation got money from russia. around the time clinton sold Russia 20% of american uranium
podesta owns shares in an energy company, that putin owns or something like that
 
lol hahaha.

sorry bout that. I meant Clinton and podesta.

clinton foudnation got money from russia. around the time clinton sold Russia 20% of american uranium
podesta owns shares in an energy company, that putin owns or something like that

Yet Russia hacked the DNC to prevent her from becoming president instead of helping her. So I think that speaks more for Russia's support of Clinton far more than your weird *** theories.
 
lol, russia did not hack! that is stupidity! by saying russia hacked you are diminishing all those people who voted for trump! the russia hack is FAKE NEWS! their is 0 evidence!!!!!!!!!!! yet youd emand trump produce evidence for the wiretap! why not apply that same standard for the russian hack


how about the fbi saying they have had donald trump under investigation since july!

soo how does fbi investigate! most of those investigations are done by surveilance. aka wiretaps.

so they only said no physical wiretaps. but this is the 21st centruy! physical wiretaps are so 20th century! now the wiretaps dont need to be physical
 
Yet Russia hacked the DNC to prevent her from becoming president instead of helping her. So I think that speaks more for Russia's support of Clinton far more than your weird *** theories.

also to your hacking hogwash. and the leadership of the left!

t7jomeftfn3y.jpg
 
Back
Top