What's new

2016-17 NBA PLAYOFFS THREAD

Cavs have no rim protection and Kyrie Irving is a huge liability. They'll start with Shumpert and put him on IT, while hiding Irving on Bradley/Smart. Thomas will score vs Cavs.
 
Cavs have no rim protection and Kyrie Irving is a huge liability. They'll start with Shumpert and put him on IT, while hiding Irving on Bradley/Smart. Thomas will score vs Cavs.

And how will the Celts hide Thomas who's the biggest liability at point guard in the NBA?
 
I stopped watching as soon as the Jazz got knocked out. Every team has been injured v. the Warriors and all this 4-0s will look bad ont he league IMO. Especially if the finals go 4-0
 
And how will the Celts hide Thomas who's the biggest liability at point guard in the NBA?
I don't know how they do it but so far they have been able to do it and it has worked to the tune of 50+ wins, #1 seed, and conference finals appearance.
 
Again, the GSW situation has just proved that the Luxury Tax situation isn't working. A team flushed with money is not going to be deterred by the Luxury tax if it meant it can keep winning and selling out the arena for the next 5-10 years.


I'm more convinced than ever that we really do need to re-look at the hard cap and of course that can go up as the League makes more money, but there should be a cap at some point where you CANNOT keep 4 All Stars together forever and ever and a day.
 
Again, the GSW situation has just proved that the Luxury Tax situation isn't working. A team flushed with money is not going to be deterred by the Luxury tax if it meant it can keep winning and selling out the arena for the next 5-10 years.


I'm more convinced than ever that we really do need to re-look at the hard cap and of course that can go up as the League makes more money, but there should be a cap at some point where you CANNOT keep 4 All Stars together forever and ever and a day.

There's probably 29 owners thinking the same thing. The Warriors being this dominant is just bad for the NBA. Cleveland has no shot against them this year.
 
Again, the GSW situation has just proved that the Luxury Tax situation isn't working. A team flushed with money is not going to be deterred by the Luxury tax if it meant it can keep winning and selling out the arena for the next 5-10 years.


I'm more convinced than ever that we really do need to re-look at the hard cap and of course that can go up as the League makes more money, but there should be a cap at some point where you CANNOT keep 4 All Stars together forever and ever and a day.


Golden State is paying Steph Curry $11M per year. He's an MVP-caliber player and he's getting paid like he's Alec Burks. It has nothing to do with Luxury Tax.
 
Golden State is paying Steph Curry $11M per year. He's an MVP-caliber player and he's getting paid like he's Alec Burks. It has nothing to do with Luxury Tax.

I'm not talking about RIGHT NOW. Yes we all know Curry is getting paid $11m, nothing we can do about that. But GOING FORWARD, without a hard cap, GSW can MAX Curry, MAX Durant, and keep paying Luxury Tax if they wanted to.



With a hard cap, once Curry is due for a raise, they would have to look at whether or not they can fit Curry's MAX under the hard cap. If not they would be forced to trade away one of Klay or Draymond, or if Curry wants to get a MAX deal somewhere else he can do that also - further weakening GSW and spreading the talent around.



It will create a much more level playing field.
 
A fully healthy Celtics team is getting trounced way worse than a hobbled Jazz team against a superior (on paper) team.
 
Yea, I'm not sure what to make of it. Is Boston that tired? Is lebron that great? Or is the east just that bad?

The Celtics have defensive liabilities aside from their wings. They focused on taking away Cleveland's 3-pt looks and ended up giving up a lay-up line for much of the first half. But yeah, Cleveland is that much better. Cleveland didn't even play particularly well.
 
Back
Top