What's new
By:

All gun control advocates please Report here!

The Thriller said:
In a thread of 14 posts, 7 of them are from you, 3 of them disparage the thread, and 1 is a crap emoticon. Just who exactly are you having a discussion with???
Click to expand...

Man, I just have him on block. He never seems to post anything of any interest, or, on the rare occasions he does, he doesn't seem to put any really thought into it, just vomits up talking points. And god forbid you try to get him to actually respond...
 
DutchJazzer said:
venezuela where tyrany taken hold. but only the government has guns and kills about 1 person a day and rising!?



but yeah just what i thought people want guns to be heavily restricted or banned! and they have no solution for when tyranny takes hold
Click to expand...

You are acting like having guns WILL stop tyranny. I invite you to show us that's the case.
 
I'm actually thinking about getting my long arm licence to go hunting with a friend. Was never something I'd ever considered before, not sure I really want to have a gun in the house even if its a rifle.
 
Harambe said:
You are acting like having guns WILL stop tyranny. I invite you to show us that's the case.
Click to expand...

it is not just the guns. it is the mentality that the avgerage gun owning owner has.

also it stopped usa from getting invaded by japan and nazi germany during world war 2

as certain towns in europe where easy to take over and control by just a few soldiers 4-8 soldiers working in shift to suppress the town. nothing they could do because they had no guns or will to fight


that wont work in USA, so every time the nazis, japan wanted to invade usa they put that plan on hold!



but the gun owning mentality! that molon labe mentality! those guys will and can stop a tyrany!


venezuelans alreayd gave in to tyrany ones they gave up guns!



look i am open minded! if you think guns should be heavily controlled/banned! i wanna know what you plan is once tyrany takes hold like in venezuela! pretty openminded doe
 
Rubashov said:
Was never something I'd ever considered before, not sure I really want to have a gun in the house even if its a rifle.
Click to expand...

it is your right to have one or not! never gonna force someone to have a gun! but i expect same courtesy form others to never force me to give up guns!


but everytime their is a mass shooting the threads go on for dozens of pages of all these gunphobes(yes i use this term sarcasticlaly, as a phobia is a medical term not a political term) come out of the woodwork to dane on the grave of the mass shooting victims! and use their death to push their political gun agenda!


but now that their are no graves to dance on for the moment! they are all hiding, and fail to see the problem of creeping tyranny!
 
DutchJazzer said:
it is not just the guns. it is the mentality that the avgerage gun owning owner has.

also it stopped usa from getting invaded by japan and nazi germany during world war 2

as certain towns in europe where easy to take over and control by just a few soldiers 4-8 soldiers working in shift to suppress the town. nothing they could do because they had no guns or will to fight


that wont work in USA, so every time the nazis, japan wanted to invade usa they put that plan on hold!



but the gun owning mentality! that molon labe mentality! those guys will and can stop a tyrany!


venezuelans alreayd gave in to tyrany ones they gave up guns!



look i am open minded! if you think guns should be heavily controlled/banned! i wanna know what you plan is once tyrany takes hold like in venezuela! pretty openminded doe
Click to expand...

No, you're not open minded.

And you're doubling down. Tripling, actually. Please show us

How guns WILL stop tyranny.
How guns WILL stop an invading army.
How guns WILL stop 4-8 soldiers from suppressing a town completely.

You can't. An argument can be made for firearms assisting in a solution to these problems, but how often will any of these actually matter? Contrast that with ALL the other times where this isn't an issue, AND the weight that firearms will are not even close to an end all solution for any of these problems when they do come up.
 
DutchJazzer said:
also it stopped usa from getting invaded by japan and nazi germany during world war 2

as certain towns in europe where easy to take over and control by just a few soldiers 4-8 soldiers working in shift to suppress the town. nothing they could do because they had no guns or will to fight


that wont work in USA, so every time the nazis, japan wanted to invade usa they put that plan on hold!
Click to expand...

yeah and a little thing like an ocean had absolutely nothing to so with it
 
moevillini said:
yeah and a little thing like an ocean had absolutely nothing to so with it
Click to expand...

May be true, but guns and American pride that went hand-in-hand definitely had a play in it:

In the first six to twelve months of a war with the United States and Great Britain I will run wild and win victory upon victory. But then, if the war continues after that, I have no expectation of success.
Click to expand...

Should hostilities once break out between Japan and the United States, it is not enough that we take Guam and the Philippines, nor even Hawaii and San Francisco. To make victory certain, we would have to march into Washington and dictate the terms of peace in the White House.
Click to expand...

--Isoroku Yamamoto

Of course, even Yamamoto (educated at Harvard and the U.S. Naval War Academy, underestimated US strength (or we got very lucky which is most likely the case).
 
franklin said:
May be true, but guns and American pride that went hand-in-hand definitely had a play in it:





--Isoroku Yamamoto

Of course, even Yamamoto (educated at Harvard and the U.S. Naval War Academy, underestimated US strength (or we got very lucky which is most likely the case).
Click to expand...
My understanding is that he was talking more about the U.S. manufacturing capacity. Eventually we'd put enough shops on the water to beat them and they wouldn't be able to get to DC before that happened.

Sent from my SM-J700P using JazzFanz mobile app
 
gandalfe said:
Man, I just have him on block. He never seems to post anything of any interest, or, on the rare occasions he does, he doesn't seem to put any really thought into it, just vomits up talking points. And god forbid you try to get him to actually respond...
Click to expand...

Are you talking about thriller or dutch? Seriously.
 
Bulletproof said:
My understanding is that he was talking more about the U.S. manufacturing capacity. Eventually we'd put enough shops on the water to beat them and they wouldn't be able to get to DC before that happened.

Sent from my SM-J700P using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...

Haven't you ever seen Red Dawn. Of course teenage rednecks with rifles would stop the Russian (or North Korean, whatever) army single-handedly.


Seriously though, Madison, Jefferson and others of the framers of the constitution wrote about the need of the people to keep and bear arms as a deterrent to tyranical government, or more specifically, as a deterrent to our own government turning tyranical. Now, however, the american military machine is so overwhelming in its power that even if all of the armed people in the country fought in a very organized and coordinated way there would effectively be no way to mount any resistance should a true tyrant gain power in America and wield the full might of the military machine.

But an argument could also be made that the tradition of keeping and bearing arms to suppress any tyranical intentions has an impact on the individuals in our military and would prompt them to not support such a coupe attempt in the first place.
 
LogGrad98 said:
But an argument could also be made that the tradition of keeping and bearing arms to suppress any tyranical intentions has an impact on the individuals in our military and would prompt them to not support such a coupe attempt in the first place.
Click to expand...

how about the whole mentality to keep guns!

their are sherrifs going on record saying they would not follow gun grab orders! and fight with civilians side by side!


it isnt just having the gun in the home or the law on paper!

it is a mentality of atleast half of the population that will suppress tyranny when it comes
 
DutchJazzer said:
how about the whole mentality to keep guns!

their are sherrifs going on record saying they would not follow gun grab orders! and fight with civilians side by side!


it isnt just having the gun in the home or the law on paper!

it is a mentality of atleast half of the population that will suppress tyranny when it comes
Click to expand...

the mentality is that far less than half the population will even recognize tyranny as it's taking hold
 
DutchJazzer said:
not from the extensive **** i read about the 2nd world war
Click to expand...

You think Yamamoto was talking about privately held firearms when he said that?

Now quote the part about there being a rifle behind every blade of grass and I'll acknowledge the connection.
 
Bulletproof said:
You think Yamamoto was talking about privately held firearms when he said that?

Now quote the part about there being a rifle behind every blade of grass and I'll acknowledge the connection.
Click to expand...

whats the qoute worth it's been translated. you should read a lot more about yamamotos work, the germans work. to get into the context of a qoute!


the quote must be interpreted form his body of work, just not the sentence alone and give it your meaning! because then it is meaningless, it is not what the guy meant

thats why in contract law, sometimes you gottta look at the framers intent. the intent of those who framed the contract
 
So answer the ****ing question.

Is that what he was talking about in that quote?

Yamamoto was a genius who pretty much nailed every prediction he made about the war. You think he was worried about America's privately held firearms?

Stop being so ****ing dumb.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top