( Crickets )

[babe]

So, in view of the culture of JFC in here, I thought it would be interesting to see another thread nobody will want to discuss.

After all, we must have over 100 potential JFC recruits blow by here every day, read a few posts, and conclude that this is a nest of vipers. We have to give them some reasonable variety of content to encourage some normal folks to stay a while......

Roger Stone is, or course, one Hillary's "deplorables", but I find his work interesting precisely because it's stuff you will never hear about on CNN.

Here's one of his latest articles:

https://stonecoldtruth.com/comey-tied-to-clintons-money/

 

[babe]

Couldn't help seeing this article, either:

https://stonecoldtruth.com/podesta-received-35-million-from-russia-while-advising-clinton-and-obama/

well, I know quite a few solid dem lawyers like Kicky, and the sort of judges we have around the country nowadays. And a number of people in the CFR, and quite a few in the bush-league recruitment camps, the farm teams of the CFR called (insert any US city with any influential citizens) "________ Committee on Foreign Relations". My own relatives, no less. A family connection to the founder of the Salt Lake committee going back into the thirties of the twentieth century through the fifties....

I know it's fashionable in here to do the primitive "conspiracy theorist" hoot and holler around the liberal campfires, or even RINO campfires, and downplay the way things actually work in this country. But I know what I'm talking about. Trump knows what I'm talking about well enough to go, hat in hand, to the national chairman to discuss his Presidential campaign, and to appoint quite a few members in his administration. He knows you cannot get anything done without them, and has reached out to seek some of more independent, thinking sort of members, to come help with what needs to be done.

But what Stone is putting out here has evidentiary support, much stronger than Trump's opponents have against Trump. Not to say Trump is a saint, or anything close.

Trump is just a rich dude who actually loves getting good things done, in his opinion, who imagines that he loves solid American values. Something he mourns is the efforts of some ideological left-wingers and communitarians who sincerely believe in reducing the global population, reducing America to about the same level as any of the top six nations in the future global governance schema, and scrolling back some older technologies like oil-based energy, and reducing the rate of resource depletion in almost every sector of our industry worldwide.

Folks who generally subscribe to, and finance, the anti-Trump crisis-management squads, like George Soros, whoever is David Rockefeller's successor (he died in March this year), Bill Gates, and a few others with net assets sufficient to rank very high among our world leaders who really do have disproportionate impact on world politics vis a vis the ordinary man.

So, anyway, in terms of our legal establishment, I really don't expect Hillary, Obama, or little sycophants like Comey or Podesta, to be seriously prosecuted, even by a Jeff Sessions DOJ.

Oh, and did I mention, I have some relatives who in fact have worked in the DOJ for many years..... so, realistically, I have good sense about what they will and will not do......

But hey, for those 100 or so patriotic Truck Drivers who come here for the Jazz and slip over to this forum, we've got to have something in here for them.....

 

[moevillini]

Thanks P.T. - though perhaps you're not fully aware that your circus has folded. But no matter, there's no harm in pretending the big tent still exists and trying to lure unsuspecting victims to enter!

 

[Gameface]

I love the assertion that CNN suppresses information. It is made by people who hear about what CNN does from their right wing propaganda machine and don't ever visit CNN.

I've been tempted to post articles from CNN that are self- critical and others that ask the exact questions babe insists CNN actively tries to hide.

Sent from my SM-J700P using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[babe]

Thanks P.T. - though perhaps you're not fully aware that your circus has folded. But no matter, there's no harm in pretending the big tent still exists and trying to lure unsuspecting victims to enter!

It is of no serious consequence if the circus has finally closed. Nobody I know ever went to see the show, but it is legendary enough to be believed by the millions of Americans who never actually saw the show. This is showbiz, Moe. The Show must go on.

The only Show that has ever really been Greater than the Circus is American Media, and that goes on even if Hillary lost the election.

I noted, in this forum, about last May, that Trump was evidently making a campaign strategy that was to poke a finger in the eye of the Press and play them for the fools they are. He didn't care what they said then, it was the proverbial "I don't care what you say, just spell my name right" celebrity gig, and it worked. Trump spent only about a tenth what Hillary did on the campaign. He got his attention for free by pumping the media chumps.

The mainstream Media is actively disbelieved by a majority of Americans now.

 

[babe]

I love the assertion that CNN suppresses information. It is made by people who hear about what CNN does from their right wing propaganda machine and don't ever visit CNN.

I've been tempted to post articles from CNN that are self- critical and others that ask the exact questions babe insists CNN actively tries to hide.

Sent from my SM-J700P using JazzFanz mobile app

Well, I enjoy your posts well enough, you would be welcome to succumb to such temptations. I know you're actually a pretty smart military thinker and probably one of the more reasonable active contributors in here, if a bit annoyed sometimes with rabble-rousing noncomformists like me.

I think Roger Stone is pretty smart, too. And there is a certain element of Americans who find his political analysis informative, fact-based, and downright sensible.

The bigger challenge for his detractors would be to show us where he's wrong.

You've had me thinking about what it would take to dissect Snopes and show bias in treatment of favored political "facts" presented there. I know Snopes gets high marks, for example, in areas of folklore.

 

[fishonjazz]

Poor babe

 

[Ron Mexico]

In summary:

CNN suppresses facts and information.

Snopes is bias folklore.

Roger Stone is a smart sensible factual source. Oh and he can't be proved wrong.

Babe is a non conformist individual smart thinker.

Cool story.




Sent from my Nexus 5X using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[babe]

In summary:

CNN suppresses facts and information.

Snopes is bias folklore.

Roger Stone is a smart sensible factual source. Oh and he can't be proved wrong.

Babe is a non conformist individual smart thinker.

Cool story.




Sent from my Nexus 5X using JazzFanz mobile app

l
None of that. Zero score.
I said in the realm of olklore, snopes is considered accurate. We are not given any information on political topics that might give us reason to believe impartiality.

For example, in regard to Hillary and her relations with Russia and the money flows to her and her foundation, husband, friends or cronies, it amounts to plausible deniability possibly well-crafted by the best of lawyers.

But the fact of actual cash flows, if with crafty timing, is undeniable.

This needs more investigation, and an actual special prosecutor looking at the specific criminal charges of taking money for favors of office.

 

[str8line]

[video]https://img.diply.com/article-images/a/85d5522e-b9f3-473e-8d6b-419d21bbda3f.gif?impolicy=desktop