What's new
By:

Donald Fires FBI Director who's investigating Russian Election Hacking

ONE LOVE said:
Can't think of anything more laughable than this....


Paul Ryan should really join Game Face's next poker tournament.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQapPACjX08
Click to expand...


LOL, good one. I think he has one planned for the 12th of Never.

but talk about a poker face...
 
For context listen to the episode of This American Life where this was originally aired.

NPR having respect for a political thinker, one like Paul Ryan? Crazy talk! Crazy!
 
i got raked over the cals for questioning the memos! and people explaining to me how damning memos can be in a court case!

well comey claimed he deleted them

HAHAHHAHA


to lazy to scroll back and qoute the people who thought these notes would be epic. you know who you are.

hahahaha


it is fun to have trump in the whitehouse.
 
Harambe said:
No one buys that. Considering lies of omission, contextual lies, and direct lies, I'm pretty sure you'd have a hard time finding anyone that lies as much as Donny does right now.
Click to expand...

So Colton clicked a "like" on this, but I remember his stated reason for not voting for Hillary: "She's A Liar".

I still think the case against Trump is pretty baseless. No serious crime, no compelling facts. All through the campaign, the Media was in the tank for Hillary, refusing to deal with the serious allegations, and the facts of her crimes. No way was Comey correct to step in and assume the role of the DOJ and conclude there was nothing to charge.

To say "Nobody believes that" defies common sense and all proportional notions of truth, it is as bald a lie as anyone could seriously assert. Millions of Americans believe it. Believe Trumps "lies" amount to less, much much less than the Dems laid out in the last campaign. Millions of Americans want Trump's programs to go forward. Probably more than half of the Trump voters last November. All these people realize that this campaign against Trump is being waged most of all as a strategic diversion to keep Trump from acting in an effective manner moving forward with his campaign promises.

Trump is right to slow it down some and seek more bipartisan support. I think there are a lot Dems who are looking at all this, and assessing the voter sentiments, and realizing they need to distance themselves from it to survive. Within a year, the Trump Train will be moving along quite nicely.

It is evident to me that Colton is "in the tank" for the Republican "resistance", along with oh say Mitt and the Bushes, a pure RINO perhaps, with hopefully a few tattered concerns for what is true. He is as good as Jonah, though, in presenting his views as factual, if he ignores the plain truth millions of Americans see. No way is he ever going to be a real Trump supporter. I don't think Paul Ryan or Mitch McConnell will make that grade either.

But we have some really absurd "resistance" zealots as well. I think that includes Red and Game, Harambe, and Zombie, who will likely keep pushing this thread until after Trump wins the next Presidential election.

I don't think it's possible for anyone in politics to be above criticism or suspicion, and whoever is in office will be the subject of all kinds of conspiracy theories.

But it is just freakin' hilarious to see Game in on this conspiracy theory, and everyone else who ever pushed that charge on me.

Trump is in my view a practical man with a lot of dirty connections, but fewer than Hillary's load. He's a better thinker than Bernie, and he is more of an American than Mitt Romney. He will make deals, but America will do better with his kind of deals, for so long as they stay in place.

The American voters will throw out the people who continue to push the "resistance" because they in a large measure are fed up with the partisan howling about so little, whether it's pushed by the media or just the politicians. The Republican officeholders who refuse to cooperate with or support Trump will lose a lot of votes.
 
Team Trump needs to sit down and decide that, yes, let's try to be on the same page when speaking in public:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/don...ict-fathers-account-private/story?id=47966439

"ABC Chief White House Correspondent Jonathan Karl in the Rose Garden on Friday asked Trump about Comey's statement to Congress the day before. "He did say under oath that you told him to let the Flynn – you said you hoped the Flynn investigation – he could let go," Karl said.

"I didn't say that," Trump said.

Pressed whether he was saying Comey lied under oath, Trump said, "I didn't say that. I mean, I will tell you, I didn't say that."

The president added that he would "100 percent" be willing to testify under oath to dispute Comey's account of their meeting.

But in a television appearance Saturday evening, Donald Trump Jr. appeared to contradict his father's flat-out denial.

"When [President Trump] tells you to do something, guess what, there's no ambiguity in it," Trump Jr. said in an interview with Fox News' Jeanine Pirro.

"There's no, 'hey, I'm hoping.' You and I are friends, 'hey I hope this happens, but you've got to do your job.' That's what he told Comey."
 
Here's Politifact's scorecard on Trump. I guess it's fairly up to date, as it includes statements made during Trump's Paris Accord withdrawal speech:

https://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

The twitter attack on the mayor of London was particularly reprehensible, IMO, coming as it did right after the latest London attack, and Trump not only completely misread the mayor's statement, but, when the mayor correctly set the record straight, Trump double downed and called the truth, which, after all could be so easily confirmed by simply reading the mayor's original statement, a "pathetic excuse". For someone who's new at being a politician, Trump has lying down pat. And, really, he always has.

Another list of Trump lies....

https://www.buzzfeed.com/maryanngeo...trump-lie-list?utm_term=.ivkrnk3dE#.eaa5P63BY
 
moevillini said:
LOL, good one. I think he has one planned for the 12th of Never.

but talk about a poker face...
Click to expand...

LOL .. yup.. imagine someone defending Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky with:


"Of course that relationship was inappropriate, but The President's NEW AT THIS".
 
DutchJazzer said:
there is also the media that cried trump since he anounced his nomination
Click to expand...
Only problem is that Trump was not treated more unfair than other candidates. During the election process there were less negative stories and more positive stories about Trump in comparison to Clinton during that time.

Just because the media brings attention to his lies a questions him does not mean they are treating him unfair right now. He deserves all the negative attention he is getting. When you lie or deceive people it's the media job to call you out.

Thankfully a lot of the media is doing a great job.
 
babe said:
So Colton clicked a "like" on this, but I remember his stated reason for not voting for Hillary: "She's A Liar".
Click to expand...

That's certainly one of the reasons. But did she lie as much as Trump has been? Not even close in my opinion. Someone said it well, I think in this thread, that Hillary was about 90% truth and 10% lie, but she sold the lie very well as if it were the truth. Trump is basically the reverse: 90% lie and 10% truth. And as a result no one believes him on those rare moments that he does tell the truth. See: story of the boy who cried wolf.

It is evident to me that Colton is "in the tank" for the Republican "resistance"...
Click to expand...

Not sure what you mean by that. I am not "in the tank" for anyone. I have my own opinions, just like you have yours.
 
DutchJazzer said:
no offense we seem to live in different world
Click to expand...

Yep, this is based on facts with evidence not how you feel. It's pretty easy to look up. I posted the multiple studies done on this already but I'm sure you cast then off as fake and stuck to your anecdotal evidence.
 
Ron Mexico said:
Yep, this is based on facts with evidence not how you feel. It's pretty easy to look up. I posted the multiple studies done on this already but I'm sure you cast then off as fake and stuck to your anecdotal evidence.
Click to expand...


mine isn't anecdotal. some groups did also studies. showing that trump was bombarded with negative news. during primaries and general.
harvard study about 2 weeks ago showed 93% negative coverage of trump.
new york times 87% negative
look not trying to start a fight with you brother.


and to be hones tonly skin i have in the game. is usa foreign policy towards israel and potentially the eu/nato. and the stockmarket and for-ex/crypto-ex are way up. which has been making a killing(although people sya it's a OBAMA leftover.


but i amhappy in a good place. lets hold hands and sing kumbaya
 
Last edited:
This might just be the true next great turning point in American history, the moment Trump took over as a true dictator. We'll have to take deep breaths if the racist hatemongers actually feel they have won the country. What we thought could happen when he won may be about to happen at that.

If you're Trump, do you fire Mueller? What choice would you have, of course you would. Backed into a corner, he'll strike first. Fire Mueller and depend on the GOP to repel the Dems, ignore the press, crack down on public demonstration. Just what Putin is himself doing in Russia. It will be loud for awhile, token Republican resistance. But the Republican leadership are traitors to their country and Constitution. Just as Trump is. Goodbye liberal democracy in America. Goodbye the Rule of Law.

Sorry to be negative, just trying to follow the mind of a tyrant and a party that's fine with tyranny, and this feels like the next stage. Long live the Rule of Law. Long live the Resistance!

https://nymag.com/daily/intelligenc...too-crazy-to-fire-the-special-prosecutor.html
 
DutchJazzer said:
mine isn't anecdotal. some groups did also studies. showing that trump was bombarded with negative news. during primaries and general.
harvard study about 2 weeks ago showed 93% negative coverage of trump.
new york times 87% negative
look not trying to start a fight with you brother.


and to be hones tonly skin i have in the game. is usa foreign policy towards israel and potentially the eu/nato. and the stockmarket and for-ex/crypto-ex are way up. which has been making a killing(although people sya it's a OBAMA leftover.


but i amhappy in a good place. lets hold hands and sing kumbaya
Click to expand...
Let's see those studies, you also left out the comparison.

Or are you talking current coverage of Trump? Because that is a meaningless stat, with nothing to compare it to. The reason it is mostly negative is because there is mostly only negative things he is doing.

I am talking about during the election time when we can compare his coverage to Clinton's coverage.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top