What's new

Who is your PG of choice?

who should the jazz acquire?


  • Total voters
    48
Rudy just started following Beverley on Twitter. That is our latest big news.

Our latest big news is Dennis Lindsey's comments after last night's draft on Exum. Said Exum has responded in a huge way this summer to the 'truth' Quin shared with him in the exit interview and that the player you're going to see next year is one that's made explosive growth. Dennis rarely, if ever, gives false praise - he was considerably more muted last year on Exum.

My hunch as to what's going on:
--The Jazz think they've got very good odds to re-sign Hayward.
--The growth they've seen from Exum this summer has convinced them that he's the player they've always thought he is, but he'll likely need another year before he completely takes over the reins.
--Paying George Hill an excessive amount of money over the next four years would risk their ability to retain Exum and Hood.
--They need a cheaper PG who will be able to provide starter minutes for at least half, if not all of next year, but will also be willing to take a back seat after that as Exum rises above them in talent.
--Donovan Mitchell is someone who can back-up Ingles at the 2, play spot PG minutes, and compete with Exum to make them both better.
--Burks is on his way out at the trade deadline, assuming rehabbed value.
 
Ricky is by far the most creative player on that list. Boris and Ingles helped develop our creative play last year, but we need more help in that area, IMO.
 
I can't vote because I just don't know yet.

The best player is Bledsoe, but we lose assets getting him.

Hill is probably the 2nd best but what is his cost?

If we could add Beverley and Lou Williams for peanuts because Houston thinks they can get every elite level free agent, then I like that over signing Hill to $18 per year. Lou gives us a proven weapon off the bench on an expiring contract. Beverley gives us attitude, defense and yet another pesky player to throw at GS, Houston, SA, etc.

I don't think Rubio is a good option. By taking him from Minnesota, we would be taking him FOR Minnesota.
 
I can't vote because I just don't know yet.

I don't think Rubio is a good option. By taking him from Minnesota, we would be taking him FOR Minnesota.

Good post. Agree. Acquiring Rubio would be giving George Hill to Minnesota, who we may very well have a first round match-up against should we re-sign Hayward (and be competing against for a playoff slot should we lose Hayward.) And we'd be the one giving up assets to make it happen.

That said, I think Rubio could be an excellent mentor to Dante and help flesh out a part of his game that he hasn't been able to get from studying under Hill. The question is if Rubio would be willing to come off the bench as Exum continues to grow this next season. My hunch says Beverly is far more likely to be amenable to that.
 
I worry that Bledsoe is too ball dominant and may disrupt what we do too much... if Hayward leaves I would want him though.

I think that Ricky is a basketball savant and that he adds stuff you don't see on both sides of the court. His shot making (or lack thereof) would be frustrating as hell. If we retain everybody though I think he's the guy that makes us the best, but his $$$ will hurt us at the other position of need.

Beverly? I love him with Hayward... if Hayward leaves then not as much, but he has the lowest dollars.

Here is my issue - supposedly Minny wants to keep Ricky now. I think Houston wants to use beverly if they can get rid of anderson... they have to clear a **** ton of cap space to do what they want. I don't want Ryno... but sacramento might... so there is a tricky 3 team dance we could do.

I will say Beverly depending on the cost. He's a mother ****er... we need one of those.
 
Agree, HH. Beverly has the bonus of being a perfect mentor to Exum AND Donovan, and has already shown a willingness to come off the bench once Exum takes the reins, which I'm now convinced will happen by the All Star Break this year.
 
Don't want Bledsoe, meh on Hill (unless cheap). From the ones mentioned, Beverly makes sense. But Pat is about as natural of a complement at the 1 for Harden as you can find. Rockets would be dumb to let him go
 
I'm not sure. I love George but the money/injury ratio concerns me. Bledsoe is great, but who do we lose that enables us to get him? Rubio is a great floor general and would be great with PN'R for Rudy, but isn't he turnover prone? And he wouldn't help spread the floor. Hopefully we could rely on our other wings for that, but more shooters is better than fewer. I do like Beverley and he's cheap, which offers flexibility.

I hadn't heard what DL said about Exum. That's great. But does that help us keep Gordon? I agree they'll need someone who can start and give us quality playmaking, but also take a back seat when the time comes.
 
Here is the trade:

Houston sends Anderson to Sacramento.

Sacramento sends Afflalo's unguaranteed deal to Houston and Boom Bitches to Utah.

We send cap space or Diaw and take back Beverly and BB. Not ideal to take back BB, but better than Anderson's deal and he's a great backup C. Plus we need more BB... he has unfinished business.

No picks involved because KK is slightly negative... its a better fit for Ryno and they were said to have wanted him last year. He becomes the vet leader voice and can shoot since they have a million bigs.
 
Deal would put us right at the tax line, but we could trade Favs/Burks/OKC pick to find a decent option at PF. Or we could sign someone and move the pieces during the season to lower the tax bill.
 
I like Hill but only if we can get him on a good deal and not for more than 3 years. I'm getting doubtful we can get him for a reasonable deal. He is going to chase money. But if we can he is the best fit and option.

Bledsoe is an injury risk and a little risky in general but the most upside.

Rubio can't shoot but will help with setting players up but I'm not sure I want a PG taking the ball out Hayward and others hands on offense. I might prefer Rondo to Rubio right now and he could be cheaper.

Beverly might be a good fit, he can play off ball well and defend well.

Exum is still someone I think that will start by the end of next season but we need someone to push him. Bev might be a good fit in those regards and is cheap.
 
I think Pat Bev is the guy but that only is the case for me if DL can pull off a trade for a playmaker at a different position. I wouldn't be happy with just the current roster+Bev if I'm Hayward. If the team is sure Hayward is coming back then I might actually go this route, and see if I can rehab Favors/Burks value with a healthy half season.
 
I wanna say Patrick Beverly because I think his defense and intensity (along with his amazing contract) would take this team to a new level. However, I worry about our shooting with him on the floor.

I love Rubio's facilitator factor, but again, where does our shooting come from?

DL's next moves are going to be interesting because shooting is starting to straight-up scare the hell outta me. We really need to move in the direction of a stretch 4 who can shoot because if your main rotation guards are Beverly, Exum and Mitchell, that's not a lot of perimeter shots going in the hoop.
 
I wanna say Patrick Beverly because I think his defense and intensity (along with his amazing contract) would take this team to a new level. However, I worry about our shooting with him on the floor.

I love Rubio's facilitator factor, but again, where does our shooting come from?

DL's next moves are going to be interesting because shooting is starting to straight-up scare the hell outta me. We really need to move in the direction of a stretch 4 who can shoot because if your main rotation guards are Beverly, Exum and Mitchell, that's not a lot of perimeter shots going in the hoop.

Beverly is a 40 and 38% 3 point shooter the last two seasons. He would be fine here unless he just drops off. I actually think his game fits really well. The only thing is he isn't as good of a shot creator as Hill, which would put more pressure on the other guys on the perimeter to do that.
 
Beverly is a 40 and 38% 3 point shooter the last two seasons. He would be fine here unless he just drops off. I actually think his game fits really well. The only thing is he isn't as good of a shot creator as Hill, which would put more pressure on the other guys on the perimeter to do that.

I do think he can create a little bit, but agree he's not as good as Hill.

I think it might be part of the reason he is rumored to want out... sick of watching Harden dribble.
 
Back
Top