What's new

JazzFanz a funny site

Mission Accomplished

Well-Known Member
Man, I was wrong about this site. When I would look through this site I thought that it was had Jazz fans that had a sense of humor. First one thing thing I noticed beside that BumTrout isn't as funny as he thinks he is. Second, I've noticed that a ton of you have a hardee for KOC what %##! is up with that? Seriously, when Sloan and Dwill left I was thinking the guy that got both a HOF coach and a future HOF player to leave is definitely out the door. Yet, he is still here and apparently his fan club resides on jazzfanzz.

Here is one of my sweetest post to date

Roses are Red
Violets are Blue
KOC I'm not a fan of you

You will probably draft Jimmer
And another white smuck
Until you are gone the Jazz are seriously #*@#ed

Which was followed by a lame poem by Joe Bagadonuts which want even close to being funny or clever

Violets are pink
Lilacks are white
KOC BEGONE
has basically lost his mind.

He rails on O'Connor
While lauding the players he's brought
What does he think a GM's job is?
A genius KOC BEGONE is not.

Which was followed by Archie talking about how clever that was are you kidding me....WTF?

Last, the negative rep is something that I don't get. Well, I get that no one is going to agree with another's post all of the time. But, boards are made to post a thought and then argue with or support yours or others ideas. It seems that some posters are internet cry babies. In real life when the going gets tough you can't negative rep the problems away.

Some posters that I feel should be respected on this board are LogGrad98, Millsapa, and Vinylone. Because even though they don't agree with some of my posts they usually try to argue or bring up valid counterpoints not go straight to the hurt my feelings button. =P
 
Do you have a problem with Utah drafting white players? Or just white smucks? Or are all white players white smucks? I'm confused.
 
It seems that some posters are internet cry babies.

I know. This site is full of them. Much of the time, they start new threads crying about the other posters or the site in general. Much like the following thread:

Cry Baby Thread


Some posters that I feel should be respected on this board are LogGrad98, Millsapa, and Vinylone. Because even though they don't agree with some of my posts they usually try to argue or bring up valid counterpoints not go straight to the hurt my feelings button.

Vinylone? Interesting inclusion.
 
Do you have a problem with Utah drafting white players? Or just white smucks? Or are all white players white smucks? I'm confused.

I don't have a problem with KOC drafting white players. Just most of his draft picks. The poem would not have been funny without the white smucks it set up the big finish.
 
Kevin wasn't amused when I drive by stamped him for you.

imagesqtbnANd9GcQ3xoamBM_RGXVX3vGS37Ob7rJuTeVEPGS0v-Xjg5ivnaMJJ3gR2Qt1.jpg
 
I'd like to hear his thoughts on this. Vinylone?


Go to the Favors Extravaganza thread and read when he finally comes in he doesn't agree with me which is completely fine. But, after are the babies giving neg rep he though about what I was writing and understood my point. He didn't agree with me and called me dick but at least he doesn't go to the I don't agree has to be a troll card.
 
Go to the Favors Extravaganza thread and read when he finally comes in he doesn't agree with me which is completely fine. But, after are the babies giving neg rep he though about what I was writing and understood my point. He didn't agree with me and called me dick but at least he doesn't go to the I don't agree has to be a troll card.

See, herein lies the problem. You can't differentiate between the "he didn't agree with me and called me dick but at least he doesn't go to the I don't agree has to be a troll card" and the "he not only doesn't agree with me but finds me utterly moranic and feels compelled to neg rep him troll card."
 
Back
Top