What's new

Summer League Notes And Discussion

please, for the love of anything/everything sacred.... please tell me you aren't serious with this argument. Please.
No where in the part of my post you quoted did I propose an argument so I can tell you that I'm not serious with the non existent argument you speak of.
 
Really hope Dante impresses more tonight. He didn't impress me in game one but he did have solid stats. Which he should. I mean, it's summer league against a bunch of scrubs.

Hopefully Mitchell plays just as well but as a rookie, I fully expect him to come back down to Earth. Many posters expectations for the kid this year should probably be tempered.

I want to see a lot more from JB tonight. A lot more. A double double with one or two threes. It's year two and he needs to announce his presence with authority.

He passed the ball well and had a nice block. He hit a few shots, enough to be considered a scoring threat. Baby steps.
 
You mean the scoring:assist ratio from a highlight clip doesn't mean more than overall statistics? You can't be serious!
Who argued it did?
I just pointed out that there were lots of nice assists in a highlight video of a guy who is known to be a poor passer.

Hayward is a much better passer than burks.

If you, cy, or naos thought I was trying to say burks is a better passer than hayward then thats on you dumbasses.
 
Who argued it did?
I just pointed out that there were lots of nice assists in a highlight video of a guy who is known to be a poor passer.

Hayward is a much better passer than burks.

If you, cy, or naos thought I was trying to say burks is a better passer than hayward then thats on you dumbasses.

"Watch a Hayward season highlight video and you see less assist to scoring ratio amount in his highlights."

You made the comparison to Hayward. By doing so, you invite the argument.

Let's keep this short and simple. Why did you bring up Hayward?
 
He passed the ball well and had a nice block. He hit a few shots, enough to be considered a scoring threat. Baby steps.

We need more than baby steps at this point. We need a good defender who gets maybe 4 assists and 4 rebounds and scores on about 11-12 a game, primarily by attacking the basket (and free throws) and spot up threes.
 
We need more than baby steps at this point. We need a good defender who gets maybe 4 assists and 4 rebounds and scores on about 11-12 a game, primarily by attacking the basket (and free throws) and spot up threes.

Exum does seem like he's willing to go after rebounds. He should get the assists part.
 
"Watch a Hayward season highlight video and you see less assist to scoring ratio amount in his highlights."

You made the comparison to Hayward. By doing so, you invite the argument.

Let's keep this short and simple. Why did you bring up Hayward?
Cause I found it strange that a poor passer had so many assists in his highlights video while a good passer didn't. Just found it interesting is all. You guys read something that just wasn't there. I was genuinely surprised by the amount of assists in burks video. I thought there wouldn't really be any tbh.


I can't make any clearer than this: hayward is a better passer than burks.
 
Cause I found it strange that a poor passer had so many assists in his highlights video while a good passer didn't. Just found it interesting is all. You guys read something that just wasn't there.


I can't make any clearer than this: hayward is a better passer than burks.

But who is the better dunker?
 
But who is the better dunker?
That's a tough one.

I would guess burks could do better dunk contest type dunks with no defender present but hayward has way more in game dunks and better in game dunks.
 
Back
Top