What's new
By:

NBA Free Agency Moves in General (related to the Jazz, but not just moves made by the Jazz)

SCS said:
It won't stay that way forever doe
Click to expand...

Yeah, but it will for at least 2 more years (KT and KD's contracts both end in 2 years). Which is great for Utah actually. Gobert's deal is up in 4 more years, so if the GSW all end up taking discounts to appease their billionaire owners, then the Jazz will know all is futile and they can trade Gobert's contract while it still has great value.
 
Where the **** does this team get shooting from moving forward? Hope? This team needs prospects, Jazz ain't getting **** on the open market.
 
Imagine trotting out a lineup of:

Rubio
Mitchell
Exum
Gordon
Gobert

Great defensively, but the other team just needs to pack the paint.
 
And Mitchell would **** It up anyway by winning ROY and 3rd team All NBA and getting us to the 7th seed.
 
Curious what Favors and Exum can get us. I say extend Hood, then keep Gobert and Mitchell.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Tom Haberstroh of ESPN predicted us to win 51 games btw.
Click to expand...

This year? Honestly, if we had Crowder I do believe we have a realistic shot at being better than last year and even 55ish. But leaving a huge defensive hole and spacing nightmare that I don't see how we can fill, in just not sure.
 
I'd probably be willing to trade Exum for Crowder.
 
infection said:
This year? Honestly, if we had Crowder I do believe we have a realistic shot at being better than last year and even 55ish. But leaving a huge defensive hole and spacing nightmare that I don't see how we can fill, in just not sure.
Click to expand...

I dont see how our team is a spacing nightmare. We won't have the best spacing, but it won't be the worst at all.

Every wing we have can shoot the **** out of the ball. I think Exum's jumper looks much improved and Mitchell is dangerous as a spot-up shooter.
 
Hekate said:
His price will be cheaper once the problems are more apparent and they don't win more than last year.
Click to expand...

Just by virtue of how much more depleted the east will be this year (including an even more sleep-walk version of the Cavs), I don't see how the Celtics could have a worse record.

Also, I think trading Bradley instead of Crowder makes a ton more sense for them. They pick up someone that can play 4 and retain another option at the position. They upgraded their size immensely in that one deal (in a good way). Also served to clear a logjam on the wings. Not sure Crowder's going ballistic about it.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
I dont see how our team is a spacing nightmare. We won't have the best spacing, but it won't be the worst at all.

Every wing we have can shoot the **** out of the ball. I think Exum's jumper looks much improved and Mitchell is dangerous as a spot-up shooter.
Click to expand...

Having a big that can shoot would help. Our wings are good... I wouldn't say shoot the **** out of the ball good.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Having a big that can shoot would help. Our wings are good... I wouldn't say shoot the **** out of the ball good.
Click to expand...

Johnson was 41% (and can be a big or wing)
Ingles was 44% (I also think he can play the 4 too)
Hood was 37% (despite being plagued by injuries and having poor shot selection at times)

I would say that is shoot the **** out of the ball good.

I'm curious to see who we add as our 3rd (or 4th depending on how you view Burks) wing in FA. There are still some good shooters left, so we might go that route, or we might try to pick up an athlete/defensive player.

Anthony Tolliver still exist too, which I think is a no-brainer addition.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top