What's new

Donald Fires FBI Director who's investigating Russian Election Hacking

I expect to wake up one day and see on the news that the USS Nimitz was sunk and the 6000 people aboard are all dead.

I've imagined in vivid detail my last moments with the bulkhead giving way to an explosion followed by a rush of seawater, and scrambling with everything I'm worth to the hatch, only to be overcome and die.

Trump is going to get my fellow service members killed. They will die horrific deaths. Trump is not worth one of them.

I expect to wake up one day and see on the news that the ship I spent 4 years of my life on has been destroyed and all aboard it are dead. I'm not joking. I wish I was.

I wish I could take the place of one of them. I wish this was my time to serve. None of the rest of them deserve this. No one should have to die because we have such horrible leadership.
 
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/10/...e-storm.html?referer=https://news.google.com/

... ... ...

What the holy hell ...!?

Is this man serious?! To me this means he plans to start some heavy ****.

Good. North Korea an Iranian threats need to be extinguished. It is far past time.


I expect to wake up one day and see on the news that the USS Nimitz was sunk and the 6000 people aboard are all dead.

I've imagined in vivid detail my last moments with the bulkhead giving way to an explosion followed by a rush of seawater, and scrambling with everything I'm worth to the hatch, only to be overcome and die.

Trump is going to get my fellow service members killed. They will die horrific deaths. Trump is not worth one of them.

I expect to wake up one day and see on the news that the ship I spent 4 years of my life on has been destroyed and all aboard it are dead. I'm not joking. I wish I was.

I wish I could take the place of one of them. I wish this was my time to serve. None of the rest of them deserve this. No one should have to die because we have such horrible leadership.

Is your lithium dose too low? This is some unstable speak right here.
 
trump joking about the first amendment is not ok?
but Obama and his socialist left wing stooges being serious about a total elimination of the 2nd amendment is ok and supported/.

double standard much?
one is a joke, get a sense of humor.

the other is serious and is a serious threat!

Pres Lincoln blatantly canceled "Freedom of the Press" to curb the copperheads of the North and prevent the real danger of a mob overrunning the Whitehouse and just letting the secessionists go.

I don't think the DumpTrump media is in any substantial respect an objective or publicly responsible "Press". Throwing them all in the hoosegawh would not materially restrain responsible reporting of real news, it would just be a realistic response to an anti-democratic insurrection.

Trump won't do it though. It is soooo much his ace politically to have THEM daily demonstrating their delusional take on everyday trivia. America is increasingly reactionary to those those morons who sincerely believe "they" are "The Press".
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zresz1gx3mI HE WANTS AUSTRALIA STYLE GUN BAN!

BAM

DOUBLE MIC DROP!


Listen to his words, champ. And then listen to his meaning.

In neither of them does he say he wants to take away, or confiscate guns. Now, maybe whoever imposed the text at the bottom wanted to hear that, but he didn't say or mean that at all.
 
ok, i used hyperbole about obama! but their are enough members of the democratic party here all examples


isnt the bolded part:



my post is reality. and i can even leave obama in that qoute. Obama thinks and says that in private. it is about banning the guns 1 step at a time. lots of other democrats said it publicly. use google! i have heard democratic party members syaing they support a total gun ban like in australia

that is how you reach your destination step by step by step. if i take 1 step you cannot say i am not intended in reaching my destination. the more steps i take, the more it is clear what my destination is!


you are just to dense to see what is happening.
want to see another socialist stooge who wants to elimante the 2nd amendment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_LaBJvI0BI
that is a socialist stooge of the obama led paty(or whoever ruins this party



so i repeat because you seem to be one dense idiot

that qoute is true. because i can find you enough stooges who tell you that they want to ben every single gun! aka eliminate the 2nd amendment.


THIS IS THE TRUTH

b0b4q_s-200x150.gif


That quote is not true. Your video response isn't of that quote, and you have nothing supporting that it is.

Your mic drop is on par with antivaxxers and flat earthers. Which, mind you, are the same tactics donnie's been using since day one.
 
So with all of this evidence you've put forth, it seems to support that you, and at least some of the right, are disconnected from reality.
 
Listen to his words, champ. And then listen to his meaning.

In neither of them does he say he wants to take away, or confiscate guns. Now, maybe whoever imposed the text at the bottom wanted to hear that, but he didn't say or mean that at all.

if i say i want al jews to be gone something like hitler did in the 40's you know exactly what i mena.

him mentioning australia which is virtually a total ban. shows you his intentions! otherwise why mention australia!


if i am tlaking about deporting jews i would never ever ever ever mention the final solution or something nazi germany did in the 40's!


i am a jew so this post is offenisve to me so mods i dont need to be infracted
 
Is your lithium dose too low? This is some unstable speak right here.

Unstable?

You think you can spend 4 years of your life serving aboard a U.S. Navy warship and not imagine it coming under attack?

My job was the work center supervisor of the RAM (Rolling Airframe Missile) system work center, a point defense weapon system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIM-116_Rolling_Airframe_Missile designed to shoot down enemy guided missiles that were fired in an attempt to sink the ship I was on. I would not have been doing my job if I didn't imagine what failing to fulfill my mission would result in. If I failed my ship would be hit by enemy missiles. The 6000 sailors aboard that ship would be at risk of death. I would be at risk of death. If anyone died because I did not do my job I would hope that I was among the dead.

You don't know anything about military service.

I imagined 1000 different scenarios relating to my ship being under attack. I imagined my own death and the death of every person on that ship. It was my motivation to do my job every day while at sea. I knew there was almost no chance that I would be called upon, but I also knew that I was ready, that my missile systems were ready. I knew that if called upon I would not fail. My missile system would not fail. I would live and my 6000 shipmates would live, and we would be in a position to defeat the enemies of the United States.

You don't know anything about being at sea on a warship. You don't know anything about being the point at which our enemies would direct their attacks. I do. I took it very seriously. I imagined success and I imagined failure. I sought to succeed. But I also joined because I believed that if someone should die, one of them should be me, in the hope that I would take the place of another more worthy of living. Maybe that sounds dark to you. Maybe you think I need lithium. I think it means I did exactly what I should have done. I think I did it well.
 
if i say i want al jews to be gone something like hitler did in the 40's you know exactly what i mena.

him mentioning australia which is virtually a total ban. shows you his intentions! otherwise why mention australia!


if i am tlaking about deporting jews i would never ever ever ever mention the final solution or something nazi germany did in the 40's!


i am a jew so this post is offenisve to me so mods i dont need to be infracted

Funny... if you're NOT deporting jews, you're not going to mention deporting jews either.

:|
 
Is he coming apart at the seams, or what? Talk about unfit...

If I just went by his speeches to his audiences at rallies, I would very much feel that something was wrong mentally with the President. And at the moment, he's not taking a lot of things well. Publicly, as always. Expresses a desire to increase America's nuclear arsenal 10 fold. His generals, and Mattis and Kelly, said to be stunned, and concerned. Trump proclaiming "fake news". Again fake news, as always when the story does not glorify him.

It is a narrative, this story of crisis in Trump's presidency. Everybody has a narrative, everybody has a story to tell. But is it a true narrative? Is he losing it? Or is the whole construct that he is losing it a liberal based fiction, at its heart a type of attempted coup, to strip him of the office? If you repeat a lie often enough. History will render a judgement here, simply because there has never been a Presidency like this one, and the competing narratives are leading to some sort of reckoning. For somebody. For Trump? Or for the media, the press? An adversarial press has long been regarded as a necessity of sorts, the press as watchdog. A 100% compliant press grants free reign. Unless one believes the anti-Trump narrative is based on all lies, then the attack on the press is chilling. Unless one favors authoritarianism, unless one favors free reign in one's ruler.

Trump creates the reality for his supporters to believe. Everything is great. The mainstream media always lies about Trump. Democrats can't get over losing. The "Russian thing" is a hoax. Daily he vilifies individuals relentlessly, alternating with proclamations that the President we're seeing is greatness personified. The administration is "great", everything is great to an historic degree. Repeat that lie often enough. Create a world for followers to believe in. If the media narrative is that the emperor has no clothes, Trump's narrative is that he's dressed for greatness, and dressed to splendor.

Then you listen to the man at his rallies. You see the appeal to militant nationalism. And maybe you've seen this before, in other times and places. Maybe you see that this is happening because the culture Trump emerged from made this possible. As it did in other times and other places. And you realize the President's narrative is not a narrative one would really expect from the man who speaks to the audience at his rallies. That man would more likely generate the narrative that is reflected in this piece:


https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/10/donald-trump-is-unraveling-white-house-advisers

"At first it sounded like hyperbole, the escalation of a Twitter war. But now it’s clear that Bob Corker’s remarkable New York Times interview—in which the Republican senator described the White House as “adult day care” and warned Trump could start World War III—was an inflection point in the Trump presidency. It brought into the open what several people close to the president have recently told me in private: that Trump is “unstable,” “losing a step,” and “unraveling.”

The conversation among some of the president’s longtime confidantes, along with the character of some of the leaks emerging from the White House has shifted. There’s a new level of concern. NBC News published a report that Trump shocked his national security team when he called for a nearly tenfold increase in the country’s nuclear arsenal during a briefing this summer. One Trump adviser confirmed to me it was after this meeting disbanded that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson called Trump a “moron.”

In recent days, I spoke with a half dozen prominent Republicans and Trump advisers, and they all describe a White House in crisis as advisers struggle to contain a president who seems to be increasingly unfocused and consumed by dark moods. Trump’s ire is being fueled by his stalled legislative agenda and, to a surprising degree, by his decision last month to back the losing candidate Luther Strange in the Alabama Republican primary. “Alabama was a huge blow to his psyche,” a person close to Trump said. “He saw the cult of personality was broken.”"
 
So what you're saying is it's only #fakenews if you are detached from reality? Otherwise, it's acceptable criticism, speculation, and hyperbole that's existed in the main stream media since the days of Radio news?

Who knew?
 
Sworn to uphold the Consitution, Trump is now advocating selective canceling of freedom of the press:

http://www.nola.com/opinions/index.ssf/2017/10/censoring_a_free_press_would_b.html

"Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech." -- Benjamin Franklin

"Freedom of the press is not just important to democracy, it is democracy." -- Walter Cronkite

"Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter." -- President Thomas Jefferson

"A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people." -- President John Kennedy

An attempt to suppress, censor or intimidate the press just because you don't like what they are reporting is moronic.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/po...es-push-back-trump-s-licensing-threat-n809941
 
So what you're saying is it's only #fakenews if you are detached from reality? Otherwise, it's acceptable criticism, speculation, and hyperbole that's existed in the main stream media since the days of Radio news?

Who knew?

An adversarial press has existed since the earliest days of this Republic. Find me one President who has not faced criticism by an adversarial press. Trump wants censorship. And that is a step beyond the pale methinks...
 
This piece does a good job explaining how Facebook was successfully weaponized in election 2016. A narrative where Russian "active measures" are only one actor. This is much more about eroding "the informational underpinnings of democracy". At the very least, we probably are well served knowing that this is happening. I imagine we owe ourselves that much.

What Facebook Did to American Democracy.

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/10/what-facebook-did/542502/

In the media world, as in so many other realms, there is a sharp discontinuity in the timeline: before the 2016 election, and after.

Things we thought we understood—narratives, data, software, news events—have had to be reinterpreted in light of Donald Trump’s surprising win as well as the continuing questions about the role that misinformation and disinformation played in his election.

Tech journalists covering Facebook had a duty to cover what was happening before, during, and after the election. Reporters tried to see past their often liberal political orientations and the unprecedented actions of Donald Trump to see how 2016 was playing out on the internet. Every component of the chaotic digital campaign has been reported on, here at The Atlantic, and elsewhere: Facebook’s enormous distribution power for political information, rapacious partisanship reinforced by distinct media information spheres, the increasing scourge of “viral” hoaxes and other kinds of misinformation that could propagate through those networks, and the Russian information ops agency.

But no one delivered the synthesis that could have tied together all these disparate threads. It’s not that this hypothetical perfect story would have changed the outcome of the election. The real problem—for all political stripes—is understanding the set of conditions that led to Trump’s victory. The informational underpinnings of democracy have eroded, and no one has explained precisely how.
 
So with all of this evidence you've put forth, it seems to support that you, and at least some of the right, are disconnected from reality.

It's baffling to me how many on the right live in a complete alt reality. I can only theorize that it's due to listening/watching Fox News and am radio. They've just so brainwashed.
 
Back
Top