What's new

Extend Hood ?

Problem is those players were trending up at the time, Hood is trending down. That's the main problem I see in DL offering 4/80.

I don't think DL will offer Hood $80M over 4 years either, but someone else could offer him that in free agency. As for Hood trending down, I don't agree with you. His scoring and likely his efficiency as well will be up this year.
 
If I'm Hood I don't sign anything less than the max. He gets to be a first option. He could average 20 this year and that basically guarantees someone gives him the max.

Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
If I were the Spurs, after this season I'd take Tony Parker's current salary and Manu's current salary and offer it to Hood. Hood and Kawhi would look good together on the wing. Hood could be pretty ideal as a third scorer.

Pelicans will also probably have space if they don't extend Cousins. They're dying for talent on the wing right now. They're giving real minutes to Ian Clarke.
 
The only guy who rivals Hood on your list is Avery Bradley. Any team that wants a shooting/scoring wing who can initiate secondary offense will like Hood. Hood is only 24 right now, and just rounding out his game.

Lets say Evan Fournier and Allen Crabbe's contracts are inflated due to the increase in the cap. Hood is still a $70M player, and all it takes is one team to clear some space and make him an offer at or above that number.

Bradley and KCP should be more sought after considering they're more proven and unrestricted. Those contracts were signed when everybody had money. There is a shockingly low amount of money to go around next offseason.

If I'm Hood I don't sign anything less than the max. He gets to be a first option. He could average 20 this year and that basically guarantees someone gives him the max.

Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app

Yeah the Jazz would. So if I'm the Jazz I don't extend Hood either, let him play for his $.

If I were the Spurs, after this season I'd take Tony Parker's current salary and Manu's current salary and offer it to Hood. Hood and Kawhi would look good together on the wing. Hood could be pretty ideal as a third scorer.

Pelicans will also probably have space if they don't extend Cousins. They're dying for talent on the wing right now. They're giving real minutes to Ian Clarke.

Spurs screwed themselves with the Pau deal. Doubt the Pels choose Rodney Hood over Demarcus Cousins.
 
If I'm Hood I don't sign anything less than the max. He gets to be a first option. He could average 20 this year and that basically guarantees someone gives him the max.

Sent from my A0001 using JazzFanz mobile app

He'd do well to take a 4/80. He's not made crazy money net yet and even if he scores 20 a game I'm not sure he gets maxed... the market will be extremely tight next year. Suffer a knee injury and he may end up on a one year make good deal. He's also a little older coming off a rookie deal.

I don't know if we offer him Gary Harris money but if we did he would take it and run imo
 
Related topic, can the Jazz give Favors a fair extension and then trade him to a team he approves? The Jazz would get more in return that way.
 
That depends on what you perceive of as fair. IIRC, the maximum we can offer him is 120% of his previous salary. I doubt that is enough even to get them to the table. We do have the option of renegotiating and extending him, but that ship sailed last season as we would need cap space to do that.
 
Gary Harris just signed for 4yr/84mil with 74mil guaranteed (team and individual bonus clauses worth the remaining $10 million)

Definitely a comp that Hood's camp will use

I agree but Harris is a better defender, younger (I think), and much more efficient offensively.

I'd also add that money is drying up and not a ton of teams will be able to spend on outside fa's next summer.

We could offer him now but I think it could be prudent to let the season play out, see how Mitchell performs, and go from there.

Why offer Hood 4/75 now if Mitchell becomes an obvious starter at the 2? If no one wants to or really has the money to offer him that? Given his injury history? Yes, we have to worry about him blowing up but if that happens, it makes re-signing him (at a higher cost) that much more of an obvious move.
 
I'd like to see Hood at the 3 for relatively significant minutes this year too to see how effective he is there.
 
I agree but Harris is a better defender, younger (I think), and much more efficient offensively.

I'd also add that money is drying up and not a ton of teams will be able to spend on outside fa's next summer.

We could offer him now but I think it could be prudent to let the season play out, see how Mitchell performs, and go from there.

Why offer Hood 4/75 now if Mitchell becomes an obvious starter at the 2? If no one wants to or really has the money to offer him that? Given his injury history? Yes, we have to worry about him blowing up but if that happens, it makes re-signing him (at a higher cost) that much more of an obvious move.

This.

We shouldn't use Denver as a blueprint for success or good FO decisions. Only way we ahould sign Hood is at a discount in the 4/60Mil range. And as stated, theres no money in FA this year.
 
So with Lin now out for the year he likely opts into his last year of his contract. Brooklyn won't have the space to give Hood an offer now... one less FA overpay destination. The more spots that are removed as FA destinations the tighter that market gets. He may end up coming much cheaper than I would have guessed.
 
Never underestimate Dave Joerger's love for Rodney Hood...

I think this is tongue and cheek, but they won't have cap space for an overpay... at about $85 M and they have their pick this year... they could clear some space but right now they have 11-12 to work with and a couple young wing/2 guards... never stopped them from doing something crazy before.

Dallas is the team that worries me most with Hood.
 
Someone is going to offer a lot of money for Rodney Hood, I bet he's not on the Jazz next season. When he's on, he's one of our very best scorers.
 
Someone is going to offer a lot of money for Rodney Hood, I bet he's not on the Jazz next season. When he's on, he's one of our very best scorers.

When he's on, he IS the best scorer on the team. The problem is he's usually not and he kinda chokes when the pressure/intensity of the game increases.
 
When he's on, he IS the best scorer on the team. The problem is he's usually not and he kinda chokes when the pressure/intensity of the game increases.

This is a correct assessment unfortunately. He has all the tools. He could really turn it on and score 20-25 per night, but for some reason he just isn't putting it together, whether it is the pressure or whatever idk. Frustrating. I hope he gets his confidence up and gets things in gear.
 
Not comparing Hood as a person to Kanter, but the situation is similar. Jazz had a young player with tremendous upside who needed to be a starter. So Gobert was elevated and Kanter was traded. Jazz have a rookie who can come off the bench for now, but has way more upside, especially on the defensive end. So if the Jazz start Mitchell at the 2 next year, where does that leave Rodney? Hood is either a poor or just average defender at the 2. Can he possibly defend the 3? I just don't see it.
 
Those are similar situations, Dmitch is going to better than Hood. He's playing for his contract, benefits us this season, but let him break someone elses bank next season.
 
I like the idea of playing Hood at the 3. Hood is a versatile scoring wing that any team could use. He's worth keeping.
 
Back
Top