suri1100134
New Member
that amazing story. i've never heard anything like that before
You still at it?
This longest thread thing is the biggest ego stroke-job in history. Nice work. Keep it.. up.
I know you do, no one is questioning that. But if you're gonna talk about love - and I am all for it - then you've got to be careful, understanding and inclusive IMO. People comes from all walks of life with different beliefs. If you're gonna connect with them you don't in the first instance throw the Bible at them, I don't think. You talk and connect with people on a human level and if they're interested in your beliefs then you tell them.
You and I have talked for a long time, and I feel comfortable enough to ask the difficult questions and to explore some of the these harder questions with you. Are you telling me all Christians have a strong faith 'all the time'? To me the journey isn't a blind faith without questions, it's 'wrestling' with doubts and getting to a higher level of understanding and getting to a level of stronger & unshakeable faith something many characters in the Bible had to do, Daniel, Job, Jacob, to name a few.
To me saying, "well the Bible said this, just read it" is well... not sufficient.
You still at it?
This longest thread thing is the biggest ego stroke-job in history. Nice work. Keep it.. up.
Funny that this whole diatribe is in reponse to reply by me that was, in fact, light-hearted and a jab at myself for being an attention whore. The irony is awesome.I don't mean to stroke your ego by doing two replies to you, but hey..... this longest thread thing won't work if I don't do a bit of redundancy.
This is a personal note. Of course you've tried several times already to suggest that I sit down, shut up, and stop talking..... not just in this thread but others. So you don't think I'm cool, and I don't givadamn.
you have your own sense of style, and you have friends here pretty much a whole spectrum, and you try to get along with folks. Well, unless you feel embarrassed by them, then you do this little smug conceited sort of "suggestion".
well, I've made a whole life of going my own way doing stuff my friends are embarrassed about. It's my style. I laugh at myself, that's how I roll.
But doing a random wandering thoughts thread, or a sort of open conversational thread, is like having a light on the porch and little welcome sign on the doormat. It's not necessarily a huge stroke job. That description might fit better say with a political thread dedicated to overthrowing the American electoral process for giving ordinary folks some say in their government.
Or having a whole site dedicated to promoting globalism/socialism or say preservation of open spaces.... as in anti-development environmentalists of the "not in my back yard" theme.
well, that's you. Great developer, now doing a project that is dependent upon your success in stopping development in your backyard.
I’m almost afraid to ask the connection of this post to my own. Almost.The idea at the outset was sorta frivolous. There have been a number of 'net threads claiming to be the longest thread ever. I've been involved in two others.....
There's no "stroke job" here. It's not serious. Not at all.
Sure I do pop off with a lot of grand philosophy and speculation, all my own opinions, with precious little authoritative reference to go with it.
Anyone who comes here needs to be feeling quite comfortable about who they are, and not feeling overly sensitive about anything I say. The idea is they get to say what they want, too.
ideas do not "belong" to humans. I think cows have "ideas" too. I know dogs do. Demonstrating fairly complex cognitive and reasoning patterns. Cows learn where the grass and water is, and make nice paths to get there in the shortest distance. Dogs are amazing in what they learn about us, and how they can be trained. I believe dogs understand me better than most human women could. Or anyone, for that matter. Simply because they pay more attention. And care.
The value of any idea is it's usefulness as some kind of reference in our thinking, or as some kind of principle for actions. If we don't enjoy the idea, or can't or won't use it, it's just words.
words don't have any intrinsic meaning or truth. Their value, like beauty, is always "in the eye of the beholder".
A "Church" cannot be true, or false, intrinsically on it's own institutional merit. The reason I think any "God" we should reverence is a person, and not some "force of nature", is because it takes a human sort of heart to actually "care" or "love", the way I believe God does
.
Yes, my cows care about their calves. With animals I'm just not sure it all comes up to the same level of caring.... We make plans, formulate intentions, to care about our offspring. I think that means "God" has to be a person. A "Person" with a plan. A "Father" if you will. So it takes that kind of a "Father" God to make a plan for us, and to stand as guarantor for the Truth of that plan.
The most impressive argument I could make for "Mormonism" is the emphasis of God being our actual "Father", as in we are actually his children. God and Man are the same species, living under different conditions, capacities or abilities, information and characteristics, maybe unique features of a personal sort, including the things we choose, but actually the same line of life. I don't know if there is a dog "God" or a cow "God" who would figure in the same way for them, but I believe I love my cows and dogs as good as I love my own kids. I say that that in the sense that the "Love" I speak of seems infinite, and goes pretty much out to the whole world without stipulation or "price". Not that I equate the value, necessarily, or the standing, of my kids in relation to me the same as anyone/anything else.
I dunno, maybe there is God of some other species, but I don't think that God has ever come to see us or speak to us, or do anything for us, at least that I have heard of. The charming thing about the Judeo/Christian idea of God is that He cares about us. I don't think the Islamists have a God like that. Maybe.... anyone wanna try to make that case????
Jesus gave his life as an atonement for our sin, to provide us a path back to our Father. If we will choose that path.
Jesus is our brother, not our Father. He volunteered to do something infinitely essential for us, consistent with our eternal rights as beings of a like kind with our Father.
The Plan was to give us life in this world, a physical sort of frame to act or work with. That is the single achievement all humans share in being born. I was talking about the value of having children above. In fact OL specifically asked me what value there could be in having children.
well, you are doing something for somebody else, helping "God", if you care to think in those terms. That is in a most fundamental sense, a "godlike" purpose and action. You are doing something for someone else that is, to them, of infinite value.
yah, this world is a craphole.... well, we could appreciate it infinitely if we chose to.... but let's just say we're not in that mood at the moment. We have a lot of difficulties, complexities, challenges of all kinds.... troubles sometimes of our own making but a lot circumstantial and universal to the human condition in this life.
But if you could believe in Jesus, and believe we have a way "home" to God, and a future life, and an eventual restoration of our physical capacities in a permanent fashion, we could just as well call this world the most wonderful place in all existence.... perfect at least in the essential need of our life.... the place where we "got a life".
"earth hath no sorrow Heav'n cannot heal". When we've run our course, all the injustices/difficulties of this life will have one permanent result. We will exist in a physical, objective, material sense with the capacities inherent in our physical existence.
A Father God who would undertake that kind of project for literally billions of us is worthy of our faith and respect, and our emulation and our effort to follow that plan.
I’m almost afraid to ask the connection of this post to my own. Almost.
@Dr. Jones
do you recall the banter some years ago when I started this thread where we discussed your post totals and those for your champion scout threads? I stated that I'd be here long after you've gone home to meet Jesus, and that eventually I'd catch up...... lol.
hard to know the level of meaning intended in strangers' comments. No offense taken, or intended. Just another affirmation that I see no need to close this thread.
Another day, another topic.
Another day, maybe another sincere point of view, or a new tidbit of information. Sure nobody really cares, few really interested, but basically I see forums like this as a sort of amusement park. Curious onlookers welcome.
Yeah, I remember.. and my prophesy holds true. Even better than Brigham’s tale of giants living on the sun.
![]()
Yeah, I remember.. and my prophesy holds true. Even better than Brigham’s tale of giants living on the sun.
![]()
Ha.. you said seaman.Ever hear of John Paul Jones and the Bonhomme Richard and Serapis, Dr.?
The Jones name has featured high in naval lore.... Davy Jones being perhaps the most notable as the seaman's devil of a sort.
I get the premise, but it’s intellectually dishonest. Mormons believe in LOTS of things that evidence is in strong disproportionate assault on those beliefs.I hadn't heard of "Giants living on the sun" as a BY point of science. Now, Jesus living inside the sun is another matter, one of those pretty much unspeakable doctrines of Mormonism. In theory, it is derived from the quote of Jesus "I am the light of the world", and some accounts of glorified humans having a radiance "exceeding the sun at noonday", and such.
That is, before Henry E. Eyring came to town and did a sort of pro-science speaking tour all around Utah and whatever other places he happened to be.....
With profound scientific explanations such as "I don't know how God did it, I just know He did." Pretty much, he was a revolution in Mormonism.
We believe in whatever the truth is, ultimately, when it becomes known.......
I get the premise, but it’s intellectually dishonest. Mormons believe in LOTS of things that evidence is in strong disproportionate assault on those beliefs.
It’s more disproving a negative.
Ha.. you said seaman.
I get the premise, but it’s intellectually dishonest. Mormons believe in LOTS of things that evidence is in strong disproportionate assault on those beliefs.
It’s more disproving a negative.