David Stern
Well-Known Member
I could see the Jazz sliding into this one with Favors to NOP and Mirotic heading here. New Orleans gets an actual expiring, Niko gets a home he wants.
That trade would make way too much sense.
I could see the Jazz sliding into this one with Favors to NOP and Mirotic heading here. New Orleans gets an actual expiring, Niko gets a home he wants.
http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=y8wlkys9
Why not step in?
Favors to NO
Mirotic to Utah
Asik to Chicago
We can include a second rounder to either team (or both). Win-win-win.
Sounds like they want expiring deals. If Boogie goes down, who do you want next to AD for the rest of the year?Because New Orleans doesn't want that.
True. If he got waived this year he probably gets paid less. There is significantly more money available in 2019 UFA I believe....as long as he doesn't value long-term stability in his job.
http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=y8wlkys9
Why not step in?
Favors to NO
Mirotic to Utah
Asik to Chicago
We can include a second rounder to either team (or both). Win-win-win.
I could see the Jazz sliding into this one with Favors to NOP and Mirotic heading here. New Orleans gets an actual expiring, Niko gets a home he wants.
True. If he got waived this year he probably gets paid less. There is significantly more money available in 2019 UFA I believe.
The thing is that the player has to assume the team will play this perfectly. As in - if he deserves his salary or more - they will pick the option, if he doesn't they will decline. Thus, Mirotic only has downside to NOP having the option to pick up his second year. Thus, he wants the year guaranteed.Before the season started almost no one thought they would pick up his option... then he balled out for a month. He wants that money and to hit FA when more teams have space.
Interesting.
New Orleans probably wants the flexibility with Mirotic, but if he isnt willing to be flexible, then yeah, maybe.Sounds like they want expiring deals. If Boogie goes down, who do you want next to AD for the rest of the year?
There's no way for a second I would think New Orleans would give up a 1st for a couple months of Mirotic or Favors and to get of Asik. Asik could be stretched pretty easily.
My first instinct is to agree, but I think they're kind of in a similar place the Jazz were last summer, but subbing out Hayward for AD. They probably feel like they really have to make the playoffs this year if they are going to keep him interested in staying around.There's no way for a second I would think New Orleans would give up a 1st for a couple months of Mirotic or Favors and to get of Asik. Asik could be stretched pretty easily.
So riddle me this, why isn't NO just having Chicago pick up his option and invalidate his say-so in the deal?There's no way for a second I would think New Orleans would give up a 1st for a couple months of Mirotic or Favors and to get of Asik. Asik could be stretched pretty easily.
The thing is that the player has to assume the team will play this perfectly. As in - if he deserves his salary or more - they will pick the option, if he doesn't they will decline. Thus, Mirotic only has downside to NOP having the option to pick up his second year. Thus, he wants the year guaranteed.
So riddle me this, why isn't NO just having Chicago pick up his option and invalidate his say-so in the deal?
So riddle me this, why isn't NO just having Chicago pick up his option and invalidate his say-so in the deal?
My first instinct is to agree, but I think they're kind of in a similar place the Jazz were last summer, but subbing out Hayward for AD. They probably feel like they really have to make the playoffs this year if they are going to keep him interested in staying around.
This seems obvious for the Jazz...
There is no way they are shopping their first just for dumping Asik. I don't believe that.