And I can't fault you for this. I was addressing this in some of my comments, indirectly.... saying of course law enforcement legal representatives will push for such a conclusion, and that the evidence is not really all that clear, and that people like Harambe and myself will take differing views.... all pretty normal imo.
I was dismayed with Finicums verbal language and his attitude, pretty much expecting and challenging the officers to use deadly force, though I didn't miss his belief that he was in the right.
Still, it was a planned stop of a known, announced, itinerary on the way to a public meeting. The FBI could legitimately be there because of their selection of government property for the protest. But still, I think the Sheriff should have made the stop.
This all happened pretty close to the "hands up... don't shoot" thing where some were alleging police misconduct in arresting blacks with the charge of police homicide. I think Obama's attitude about that should have been, pretty much, his attitude about the cowboys.
But all that fails to address the political reasons behind the moves against both the Bundys in Nevada and the Hammonds in Oregon. The facts of the contested lands being the subject of commercial negotations being promoted by bribed or otherwise financially-benefited politicians.... involving Chines business proposals. Chinese business actually controlled by the Chinese Red Army.
Nobody is hearing about that in the media, any more than anyone is hearing about how McConnel has business ties with the Chinese, or for that matter.... Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, and Sen. Feinstein.
It all goes pretty smoothly with the idea of international management under terms that render US citizen's Constitutional rights and representation in our government nil.
yah.... it really makes the Trump collusion look petty.
Dude!
I have no clue how I missed the Red Army wanting Finicum dead. Hope I’m not on their radar.