What's new

Physical appearance vs. Intelligence: A Serious Question.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Also, liberals usually have "appearance inadequacies" they are trying to compensate for so the only insult they have left to fling once they lose the debate on its merits is to call their political opponents stupid. You saw it with Reagan, Bush (a pilot, MBA), ...

This explains so much of why George Clooney disparged GW Bush.
 
Liberal PC BS carried over from their racial fixations. Also, liberals usually have "appearance inadequacies" they are trying to compensate for so the only insult they have left to fling once they lose the debate on its merits is to call their political opponents stupid. You saw it with Reagan, Bush (a pilot, MBA), and they think it is especially funny to insult the intelligence of conservative women especially if they are beautiful.

George Bush may be smart, but he sure didn't act like it.

Sarah Palin is absolutely a moron, which is sad... because it takes away from her hotness... same with Bachmen who may in fact be the stupidest candidate the GOP has/will ever put up.

But the president doesn't have to be good looking, but we do expect the president to be somewhat intelligent... which makes your argument even more asinine...

and the GOP would do the same thing to Dem's if they knew how to...
 
Liberal PC BS carried over from their racial fixations. Also, liberals usually have "appearance inadequacies" they are trying to compensate for so the only insult they have left to fling once they lose the debate on its merits is to call their political opponents stupid. You saw it with Reagan, Bush (a pilot, MBA), and they think it is especially funny to insult the intelligence of conservative women especially if they are beautiful.

I just don't even know where to start.
 
You do realize that I have a voice like Johnny Gilbert mixed with Marty Robbins, the body of Brad Pitt mixed with Matt Harpring, and the brain of Einstein mixed with Andrew Dice Clay -- right? I'm the catch of the century, and you're a bottom feeding pooh finger. Get off my train!
Yes, yes I know which is the reason I took to the time to get your attention and now that I have it.

How You Doin'?

With that said, I'm also guessing our genetic make up may have something to do with it which led to it being more socially accepted and it has just grown further with social media being what it is today. For example I remember reading that subconsciously "good looking" people are helped/treated nicer in similar situations then people who may not be as aesthetically pleasing to the eye, it was believed it was tied to our genetic code of "making the heard stronger".
 
//r00t for jazz: doesn't it seem like your reasons should make it so that appearance were something people are more accepting of other's ridiculing?
 
This thread has been hammered by the ugly stick.

I really hope that was more hurtful than saying it's a stupid thread.
 
Because you misunderstood a comment on your age/maturity for a comment on your intelligence?
 
Would you have preferred Neo-Maxi-Zoom-Dweebie! Or geek or nerd? Guess those can be taken as insults but with positive aspects towards ones intelligence. Or are you just mad the idiot wasn't prefaced with a physical insult as well?
Also the "idiot" incident was it because of acting like an idiot because you can do something idiotic (stupid) but not actually be stupid but of course if these actions are repeated then eventually your actions define who you are.

Not that me or my opinion matter or should matter anyway. Since I decided long ago what others say or call me is the absolute truth (most of which would get me banned and will be filtered) so I am just a retarded ugly albino fire crotched dumb **** that sucks at all things that is life.
 
It's not a matter of what I would prefer. The question is why is it more acceptable to insult someone's intelligence rather than their physical appearance? Both are to a large extent outside of the person's control, but they can both be improved by the person with work and or help from the medical community.
 
id·i·ot   [id-ee-uht] Show IPA
noun
1. an utterly foolish or senseless person.
2. Psychology . a person of the lowest order in a former classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25.
(dictionary.com)

id·i·ot noun \ˈi-dē-ət\
Definition of IDIOT
1 usually offensive : a person affected with extreme mental retardation
2 : a foolish or stupid person
(https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/idiot)


No real mention of maturity. Pretty much sticks to things that would be deemed offensive to most people. In fact that term is included in one of the definitions.

I imagine it would have been more accurate to state that they are immature rather than idiots, if commenting on maturity was the intent. Either way, I think it could be deemed offensive.
 
Only if the context is "I'm NOT saying this to insult your intellect, but rather, your maturity. You're an idiot." That's the ONLY way I could see context mattering. But thats not even really relevant because your still saying what your saying. If I said "I'm not saying this to call you fat and ugly, but rather to call you worthless. You're fat and ugly" I'm still calling you FAT and UGLY!!!!!
 
Only if the context is "I'm NOT saying this to insult your intellect, but rather, your maturity. You're an idiot." That's the ONLY way I could see context mattering. But thats not even really relevant because your still saying what your saying. If I said "I'm not saying this to call you fat and ugly, but rather to call you worthless. You're fat and ugly" I'm still calling you FAT and UGLY!!!!!

Dude, you're a troll. I'll take my infraction now, lmfao.

Besides, didn't you tell KatieMCR she looked like a troll? If you can't tell the difference you're not being honest. You know how we feel about intellectual honesty around here, right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top