And right on que heathme posts right after this one lolwatching the debate, I disagree with nearly all of Bernie’s policies but dammit I like the guy. I feel the same way about AOC. Happy that young people have a voice, even though I disagree with her conclusions.
We used to be able to disagree and still like each other.
We used to love to engage in respectful dialogue and we were confident we could win an honest debate.
Now we attack and demean and mock.
We’ve turned into douches.
I have heard this beforeAny one of them beats trump imo. His negatives are higher than HRC. People will vote fir belly button lint over trump.
I didn't get to watch them, no. Please tell me they weren't worse than this lol
Um, Marianne Williamson is kind of... Killing it tonight?
Yikes. They could cut the number of people in these debates by half and I don't think anyone would complain.They were chaos compared to this.
She's like 90% crazy, but her answers on reparations and environmentalism/class were actually really good.She's interesting. First candidate I've heard use the term "dark psychic energy."
Agree about college debt forgiveness and decriminalization of border crossings, disagree about Medicare for all.These progressive social programs like Medicare for all, tuition forgiveness, decriminalizing undocumented immigration, etc. are not going to get anyone elected. They also wouldn't pass the Senate if someone who supported them did get elected.
These debates on CNN have a lot more substance than the previous round of debates. I just don't think any of these people are realistically electable. I think the Dem ticket is going to come down to Biden and Harris.
Um, Marianne Williamson is kind of... Killing it tonight?
A fairly commonly held one. What form it should take is definitely up for debate, but I think this country owes a debt to those upon whose backs we built this country, and then proceeded to wage a war of oppression against for a century.Except reparations, what kind of concept is that?
A fairly commonly held one. What form it should take is definitely up for debate, but I think this country owes a debt to those upon whose backs we built this country, and then proceeded to wage a war of oppression against for a century.
A fairly commonly held one. What form it should take is definitely up for debate, but I think this country owes a debt to those upon whose backs we built this country, and then proceeded to wage a war of oppression against for a century.
I don't think it's an overstatement at all. And it's not just slavery, but the failed reconstruction and Jim Crow laws in the wake of it that set the stage for the world we're living in now.I think it's a gross overstatement to say the country was built on the back of slaves. As for repaying them, they've been gone for more than four generations. Not to say I'm against social programs to help people and try to break cycles of poverty and other hardship, but I don't think referring to Southern slavery is the most relevant or useful starting point to refer to.
I don't think it's an overstatement at all. And it's not just slavery, but the failed reconstruction and Jim Crow laws in the wake of it that set the stage for the world we're living in now.
I think Ta Nehisi Coates makes a compelling case
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-for-reparations/361631/
That's a cop out. It's less a moral burden than paying for bombs or aircraft carriers. And whether white people like to hear it or not, they have benefited from that oppressive system.You’re putting a moral burden on people who weren’t directly involved with slavery. It definitely doesn’t help the debate imo.
That's a cop out. It's less a moral burden than paying for bombs or aircraft carriers. And whether white people like to hear it or not, they have benefited from that oppressive system.