What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

Safetydan said:
That's all you have to say? You didn't read past that line? If you can't respond to the full post, much less with a measure of understanding and consideration, You don't deserve anybody's time. It's like talking to a child
Click to expand...
What you said proves my point. I don't need to waste words
 
JazzyFresh said:
What you said proves my point. I don't need to waste words
Click to expand...

It only proves that I don't know that a transcript exists or not. I gave you a reason why we may never see it if it exists and why reasonable people might think that the dearth of evidence and cooperation from the white house, in and of itself, is, to some measure, an indication that the president might be guilty.

You can't read past the first sentence because its inconvenient for your pre-conceived messaging to consider the rest of the post.
 
Safetydan said:
It only proves that I don't know that a transcript exists or not. I gave you a reason why we may never see it if it exists and why reasonable people might think that the dearth of evidence and cooperation from the white house, in and of itself, is, to some measure, an indication that the president might be guilty.

You can't read past the first sentence because its inconvenient for your pre-conceived messaging to consider the rest of the post.
Click to expand...
Lol and you're not pre-conceived? Sure. Guilty until proven innocent
 
Safetydan said:
I only wonder why you're here in the first place. Glutton for punishment? Must be hard to have your *** handed to you on a daily basis.

People here are literally tired of owning you, so they've stopped responding. You see that as evidence. LOL
Click to expand...
I feel I've been right this entire time. You guys have went from a phone call to whatever you have gone too. My story hasn't changed, you guys have no case. Your guys story had changed daily.
 
JazzyFresh said:
Lol and you're not pre-conceived? Sure. Guilty until proven innocent
Click to expand...

I'm not in this case. I am considering the evidence and testimony. I'm not certain that Donald Trump is guilty, although considerable and credible evidence exists for making that conclusion. You've made up your mind and continue to gather evidence negative only and post it here like a bot. You're guilty of that.
 
Safetydan said:
I'm not in this case. I am considering the evidence and testimony. I'm not certain that Donald Trump is guilty, although considerable and credible evidence exists for making that conclusion. You've made up your mind and continue to gather evidence negative only and post it here like a bot. You're guilty of that.
Click to expand...
I was right about Russia I'm right about this.
 
JazzyFresh said:
I feel I've been right this entire time. You guys have went from a phone call to whatever you have gone too. My story hasn't changed, you guys have no case. Your guys story had changed daily.
Click to expand...

The "story" as you call it is newly emerging evidence and information both ways. You've considered the testimonies as well, You've just ignored the lions share and honed in on the stuff that already confirms that "I've been right this entire time". I don't think that's what you should be doing here.
 
Safetydan said:
The "story" as you call it is newly emerging evidence and information both ways. You've considered the testimonies as well, You've just ignored the lions share and honed in on the stuff that already confirms that "I've been right this entire time". I don't think that's what you should be doing here.
Click to expand...
Testimonies where 5 witnesses say there was nothing impeachable?

No dude, it is you guys not listening.
 
idestroyedthetoilet said:
You are a ****ing wierd dude. Is there a reason you quote me and post random **** afterward? Your forum conversation style reminds me A LOT like the people who frequented the conspiracy forums I used to read as a hobby. Very distinct mannerisms.

Oddball.
Click to expand...

Awesome. Lead with name calling, miss the point entirely, end with name calling.
 
JazzyFresh said:
Yes or no...

Democrats have been after Trump since day one. I just ask for a simple yes or no.
Click to expand...
Absolutely yes, but I’ll add that Trump hasn’t done himself any favors by appointing certain people in his cabinet. Both parties are uttering the grossest display of pointing fingers at each other without acknowledging their own shortcomings. They owe the people more than this. At this point nothing short of a revolution will shift things towards the people’s benefit.
 
JazzyFresh said:
Yes or no...

Democrats have been after Trump since day one. I just ask for a simple yes or no.
Click to expand...

LOL "something something you guys move the goalposts" Jesus Christ.

You'll never get a simple yes or no from me. You don't get those from anybody worth their salt. As usual you don't understand.

It's an oversimplification again. Are you a child? Has either political party not been after the other one basically always? How many times did Bush get investigated for impeachment? The democrats were after him from day one.

Does it matter if they've been after him from day one if he's ****ing guilty? No, it doesn't.

The answer to your question is, I have no idea if they've been completely after him from day one and to what degree. I'm sure there are some democrats who have been on a straight up crusade to impeach and they said as much, and some who were like "we need to keep this guy on a short leash" and some who maybe started with an open mind and have considered the evidence that exists that he's been corrupt, and then some who've indicated nothing. Who ****ing knows dude.

You definitely don't know.
 
Safetydan said:
LOL "something something you guys move the goalposts" Jesus Christ.

You'll never get a simple yes or no from me. You don't get those from anybody worth their salt. As usual you don't understand.

It's an oversimplification again. Are you a child? Has either political party not been after the other one basically always? How many times did Bush get investigated for impeachment? The democrats were after him from day one.

Does it matter if they've been after him from day one if he's ****ing guilty? No, it doesn't.

The answer to your question is, I have no idea if they've been completely after him from day one and to what degree. I'm sure there are some democrats who have been on a straight up crusade to impeach and they said as much, and some who were like "we need to keep this guy on a short leash" and some who maybe started with an open mind and have considered the evidence that exists that he's been corrupt, and then some who've indicated nothing. Who ****ing knows dude.

You definitely don't know.
Click to expand...
I call this a 100% lie. If you can't even be truthful than what's the point? It shows you are willing to lie.
 
Jazzta said:
Absolutely yes, but I’ll add that Trump hasn’t done himself any favors by appointing certain people in his cabinet. Both parties are uttering the grossest display of pointing fingers at each other without acknowledging their own shortcomings. They owe the people more than this. At this point nothing short of a revolution will shift things towards the people’s benefit.
Click to expand...
Agree but the think that Trump is the first President we've had that's overstepped his boundaries is why I don't buy theses guys garbage. I pointed out how there are criminal proceedings and FBI agents who completely fabricated lies to get the FISA warrant under Obamas watch and nobody has said a single word...

Me? I see corruption from every president since I've been alive. Have I screamed impeachment? Are we having 3 year investigations? For hells sakes how does Pelosi afford her multi million dollar mansion in San Francisco? The only reason these people care now is because it's Trump. Its cowardly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top