What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

Sweet!
#WINNING: This year in judicial confirmations. ” No president in our history has ever placed this many judges on courts of appeals in his first three years. One-fourth of all circuit court of appeals judges were nominated by Trump. . . . If Trump is reelected next year, he will be able completely to transform the federal judiciary. If he isn’t, he won’t be.”
 
silesian said:
he meant something nice when he defended the good nazis in Charlotte, for example. And the Hispanic rapists — He meant that in a good way.

it must be exhausting defending this human slime. These folks are going to have a mental breakdown at some point.
Click to expand...
I'm sure you wish he had actually said either of those things. Your extreme interpretations are excellent examples of the point I was making.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PJF
Joe Bagadonuts said:
I'm sure you wish he had actually said either of those things. Your extreme interpretations are excellent examples of the point I was making.
Click to expand...

Well he actually did.

“Very fine people on both sides”.


one side was the Nazis.


If he said there were very fine people kneeling for the anthem, trump cultists would’ve wet their diapers.

excuses and apologies.
 
cor-mrz121419-color-1-7mb_orig.jpg
 
Never Trumpers are still idiots.

https://www.redstate.com/stu-in-sd/2019/12/26/rich-lowry-–-still-nevertrumper/

"Lowry claims the President’s conduct was “wrong” despite the phone call transcripts, the public statements to the contrary by both presidents on that phone call, and the testimony from the single witness in the House’s impeachment inquiry that destroyed the Democrats’ “quid pro quo” allegations. Lowry couldn’t have possibly made his conclusion without a deep-seated and continuing animus against the President. And to somehow equate the Clinton and Trump impeachments is disgraceful. Both articles of impeachment failed to allege a single statutory crime committed by President Trump, unlike the 11 crimes that were cited in the Clinton articles of impeachment. The rest was pablum. Amash was a NeverTrumper long before the Ukraine hoax while Van Drew reflects the sentiments of his district.

Lowry hasn’t changed his anti-Trump spots at all. You can be certain that he will give aid and comfort to whoever the Democrat candidate is in 2020 through continued undermining of the President and an almost certain loud and public “non-endorsement” during the campaign. William F. Buckley would be aghast at his legacy as personified by the current editor of his beloved National Review.

The end."
 
Joe Bagadonuts said:
Maybe he didn't mind watching the Dem's driving the political futures of their newly elected reps off a cliff.
Click to expand...
Sure, maybe. Sounds like something Trump would do. Nice to see we are in agreement that he apparently wanted to get impeached though.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Last edited:
Political Jazz Fan said:
Never Trumpers are still idiots.

https://www.redstate.com/stu-in-sd/2019/12/26/rich-lowry-–-still-nevertrumper/

"Lowry claims the President’s conduct was “wrong” despite the phone call transcripts, the public statements to the contrary by both presidents on that phone call, and the testimony from the single witness in the House’s impeachment inquiry that destroyed the Democrats’ “quid pro quo” allegations. Lowry couldn’t have possibly made his conclusion without a deep-seated and continuing animus against the President. And to somehow equate the Clinton and Trump impeachments is disgraceful. Both articles of impeachment failed to allege a single statutory crime committed by President Trump, unlike the 11 crimes that were cited in the Clinton articles of impeachment. The rest was pablum. Amash was a NeverTrumper long before the Ukraine hoax while Van Drew reflects the sentiments of his district.

Lowry hasn’t changed his anti-Trump spots at all. You can be certain that he will give aid and comfort to whoever the Democrat candidate is in 2020 through continued undermining of the President and an almost certain loud and public “non-endorsement” during the campaign. William F. Buckley would be aghast at his legacy as personified by the current editor of his beloved National Review.

The end."
Click to expand...

#russianfakenews


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I just read something like if Trump is impeached by the House and not the Senate then it can nullify his first term and make him eligible for two more terms.

Please someone tell me this isn't true or nothing to worry about.
 
Archie Moses said:
I just read something like if Trump is impeached by the House and not the Senate then it can nullify his first term and make him eligible for two more terms.

Please someone tell me this isn't true or nothing to worry about.
Click to expand...
Sounds like some made up fake news to me.

It's also nothing to worry about if it were true since there is no way he would last that long lol.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
fishonjazz said:
Sounds like some made up fake news to me.

It's also nothing to worry about if it were true since there is no way he would last that long lol.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...

I thought there was no way he'd get elected too, but here we are.

I'm guessing it's fake news too. It was on a meme talking about how it was going to trigger the snowflakes.


The internet literally offers the world all the knowledge of mankind and yet, somehow, it's made people dumber.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top