Zombie
Well-Known Member
That was the pressing concern yes, so that's what dominated the conversation at the time. But I thought it was pretty well understood that there is a second stage of contact tracing and mass testing that needs to happen once we've got the capability for it.The original discussion on flattening the curve really was just an effort not to overwhelm hospital resources. The diagram below points this out very literally. The eventual number of infections in the population isn't expected to be reduced. Instead, those infections are being spread over a longer period of time (the speed of the spread is being slowed) so that hospitals can handle the load. Eventually, the same number of people are expected to be exposed to the virus--maybe as much as 50% or 70% of the population will be exposed within the next 12 months.
The only way to have prevented this would be to ban all air traffic into the U.S. back in December and then test and hard quarantine everyone who enters the country. That didn't happen.
Now a combination of government resources and private companies have mobilized to produce masks, face shields, medical clean suits, makeshift hospitals, ICU beds and ventilators. The hospitals have been gearing up while the socially distanced population has slowed the spread to buy time. That's all that's happening.
![]()
As for shutting everything down in December + testing and quarantining I don't think we would have needed to start that far back. Again, other countries have managed to contain the outbreak without having to have done so. Our problem is that we didn't have their testing ability, nor do we currently have their tracing capabilities. Hence the shutdown until we get something like that in place.