What's new

Steele gets cover-up

babe

Well-Known Member
Judicial Watch has obtained documents that show foreign agent Steele got most of his contact exchanges with the US wiped off the record. There's still plenty of evidence...... He was working for Obama/Hillary (State Department) during the illegal spying on US candidate/President Trump, and he got his requested record cleanup, which could have documented actual involvement of Obama and Hillary in the scheme.

 
Judicial Watch has obtained documents that show foreign agent Steele got most of his contact exchanges with the US wiped off the record. There's still plenty of evidence...... He was working for Obama/Hillary (State Department) during the illegal spying on US candidate/President Trump, and he got his requested record cleanup, which could have documented actual involvement of Obama and Hillary in the scheme.

1) Nothing in that article talked about getting the exchanges wiped.
2) That the records are there means they were not wiped.
 
wherethebeef.PNG
 
1) Nothing in that article talked about getting the exchanges wiped.
2) That the records are there means they were not wiped.

I got the wrong article in my link-grab when I went back to write this. But still, you did not read this. The second from last paragraph does relate to Nellie Ohr saying she was deleting all the emails related to Steele from the DOJ record. This is, actually, a crime. The FOIA requires our government, including the FBI, CIA, and the DOJ to keep the records of their work. They can be put on a time-delay denying release to the public, but they have to be kept. They can be classified as secret for reason, but they have to be kept. And they have to brought out when a judge gives the order, perhaps under seal, in a criminal case. That is, if "law" means anything anymore, and we are not flying by the seat of our arrogant pants because we have all the right people working together to get stuff done "right".

"Arrogance of Power" is where a tyrant, or anyone with enough power, can with confidence ignore the law. And often, do so demonstratively, to show anyone who would question his/her power, that he can do just that.

Your fav b-aitch/ witch Hillary is a confessed criminal just looking at what she said on the news when asked about wiping her server. It was illegal to have that server, let alone be doing business like that to evade FOIA law. That Comey claimed no one would prosecute Hillary was a boast that she can't be touched by mere laws.

You know damn well that our media would be making holy hell if Trump did anything like that, or any official in the Trump executive branch, were doing things in their official positions to help spy on a political opponent, or start fake scandals by leaking a few tidbits of false information to a complicit press.

You and Red have spent literally years of your lives pushing such false narratives, but you hide behind technicalities responding to me when I call you out for it, when you can, or ignore it if you can't find something useful to cover your ***.

The whole "Resistance" thing against Pres Trump is, and always has been, an "Arrogance of Power" operation to deny the political process to American people who don't want your agenda, who believe sincerely in the progressive elitist "cause" for globalism enough to consider the American Constitution and American law to be less worthy of power than your faithful agenda masters.

In doing all this, the truth is that those who support it do not believe in elections having real meaning, that people should have enough power to direct their government, or even that any little people should actually have human rights....... well, not really......not when it matters.

The hard truth is, governments can and do really exercise aggressive denials of human rights, whatever the form or political claims of the government officials. They always do, and always will. The only hope we have of actually having any human rights is to have constitutional or legal provisions for pushing back against such bureaucratic and tyrannical facets of human impulses exercised in any governance scheme.

If people can not so obtain redress from tyrants in peaceful ways, it is the American Exceptionalist idea that perhaps we can win political influence by countering government force as we did in the American Revolution. I don't like that method, which is why I will do all I can with words and ideas, and generally live as good laws, or existing laws, otherwise require. Until, lets say, there is no other means of working for human liberty or human rights.

King George, some say, lost his mind. I disagree in the substance of the assertion, because I know that what he lost was his power. His offenses on the score of "Arrogance of Power" were politically forced by important financial interests who were insisting on the colonies being exploited on their terms. I'd consider it the same problem if Trump were so vulnerable to interests, but I know...... and you damn well know...... Joe Biden is.
 
I got the wrong article in my link-grab when I went back to write this. But still, you did not read this. The second from last paragraph does relate to Nellie Ohr saying she was deleting all the emails related to Steele from the DOJ record. This is, actually, a crime.

Deleting emails from your private account is not, and never has been, a crime unless they are under subpoena, and even then only from the storage on the server. Deleting email in a private account does not, in particular, remove them from government servers. Nellie Ohr didn't work for the government and had no access to government servers.

Your fav b-aitch/ witch Hillary is a confessed criminal just looking at what she said on the news when asked about wiping her server. It was illegal to have that server, let alone be doing business like that to evade FOIA law. That Comey claimed no one would prosecute Hillary was a boast that she can't be touched by mere laws.

Again, anything sent to or from her Secretary of State account is stored on government servers, and Comey's acknowledgement was to the wide-spread nature of people doing government work on unofficial emails. If you prosecute Clintion, you have to prosecute every member of Congress who sent official mail to her personal account.

You know damn well that our media would be making holy hell if Trump did anything like that, or any official in the Trump executive branch, were doing things in their official positions to help spy on a political opponent, or start fake scandals by leaking a few tidbits of false information to a complicit press.

That's one reason Trump is always getting holy hell.
 
So, you evade the facts hiding behind BS every time, without fail.

The "private server" set up in Hillary's private property was not something she used to send pics of grandchildren or dogs to friends and relatives. She did official business on it, to evade FOIA or other public discovery. Obama knew that, and sent her messages on it because he wanted to evade public discovery as well. For both instances, it was a felony to do so.

You claim that since nothing was wiped from DOJ or FBI or CIA computers (not the fact), no law was broken. You say since nothing was wiped, there must not have been anything to hide. You are a political cover-up artist, I suppose, but you are being a stinker and you know it.

If it is not against the law, and prosecuted, in the case of Hillary and Obama, you will argue it is against the law for Trump to do the same thing. Nobody has come out with knowledge, or sought prosecution for Trump yet, but all of the DC progressive public employees who are on the bandwagon to dump Trump must be unwilling to use their knowledge against Hillary and Obama.

That is the social climate underlying what I call "The Arrogance of Power" mentality. It means if you have a King, you don't tell the tales of the Palace because you fear being summarily executed by the Palace guards. That is what today comprises the real power behind world governance, and that is the thing you should realize before going deeper into the corrupt network of influencers who maintain that power.
 
So, you evade the facts hiding behind BS every time, without fail.

The "private server" set up in Hillary's private property was not something she used to send pics of grandchildren or dogs to friends and relatives. She did official business on it, to evade FOIA or other public discovery. Obama knew that, and sent her messages on it because he wanted to evade public discovery as well. For both instances, it was a felony to do so.

Almost every member of Congress sent email to the same server, including the Republicans. Further, if you send an email from (or to) an official government address, it can be found on the government server, no matter to whom you send it ()from whom you get it). These are plain, ordinary facts of how mail server technology works.

I agree Secretary Clinton broke the law by using the server.

..., you will argue it is against the law for Trump to do the same thing.

I doubt Trump is using a private server.
 
Back
Top