What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

JazzyFresh said:
Lmao like they are going to admit they rigged the election, fabricated a story, divided the country, over nothing.

Lolol you sheep
Click to expand...
Wait, that's EXACTLY what you said. Like word for word. So which anal-reaming shepherd are you following?
 
JazzyFresh said:
Sheep-"Trump said this!!!!"

Intellects-Ok simple question. What evidence do you have that he said what you claim he said?

Sheep-"I schooled you"

Intellects-Wait... I'm not asking for much. I just simply want to know what evidence you have that he said what you claim

Zombie-"There's a walrus over there"

Intellects-That's really nice but that didn't answer a very very very very simple question. Yes or no do you have any evidence to support the claim that YOU made? You're making a pretty substantial and bold claim and every single named person there disputes your claim and says otherwise. Even a guy who whole heartedly hates him didn't hear it.

Sheep- "In retrospect that was almost a crossing the rubicon mome...."

Intellects- Will you just answer the question? It's a simple yes or no. I don't need to hear about rubicon blah blah as that has nothing to do with the conversation at hand. Again a simple yes or no would do.

Sheep- ADHD is hard
Click to expand...
That was a lot of words to say Zombie was right and I'm a dumbass. Brevity is the soul of wit you know.
 
LogGrad98 said:
Wait, that's EXACTLY what you said. Like word for word. So which anal-reaming shepherd are you following?
Click to expand...
The FBI admitted they lied to get FISA warrants. They admitted and even apologized for it. This is indisputable and I even provided them doing so. You and fish both misunderstood what I was saying and I even admitted that I worded the sentence wrong. I was talking about the FBI who did admit it, not the media.
 
Zombie said:
That was a lot of words to say Zombie was right and I'm a dumbass. Brevity is the soul of wit you know.
Click to expand...
Yes....
or
No....

Staying silent is like a slow growing cancer to the soul and a trait of a true coward. There is nothing intelligent about not standing up for yourself. You may not win every battle. However, everyone will at least know what you stood for—YOU
 
I'll ask myself...

Self do you have any evidence that supports your idea that he didn't say it?

Me-yes I have even provided that evidence. I have provided witnesses who said it never happened. I have provided some names, the fact that they were there, and even provided a few quotes where even his worst enemy says he heard no such thing.

That's the difference between me and a coward.
 
LogGrad98 said:
Holy crap this is going on in 2 threads. I posted the list of indictments. He ignored it of course.
Click to expand...
As I said, i don't deal with people who can't even use their own voice. It shows that they need others to talk for them and that obviously means they don't understand what they are copy and pasting.

By all means, your own words, who was indicted for collusion?
 
LogGrad98 said:
Holy crap this is going on in 2 threads. I posted the list of indictments. He ignored it of course.
Click to expand...
Here in your own article, as I said "that obviously means they don't understand what they are copy and pasting."

But Mueller did not charge or suggest charges for anyone on one of the biggest questions he faced: whether the Trump campaign worked with the Russians to influence the election.

Read people, bloody hell.
 
Last edited:
JazzyFresh said:
I've provided Bolton and 5 other witnesses. You've provided passive aggressive menes
Click to expand...
Still can't come up with it huh? Not surprised after you have been sniffing farts the last 3+years.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Not answering just proves that you can't answer the question because it destroys your made up anonymous fairytale. If you really had any evidence you would happily say so and crush Trump and it would be deservedly so. That's if he said what you liars claim. But... You... Can't . You simply can't.

Night sheep.
 
JazzyFresh said:
Here in your own article, as I said "that obviously means they don't understand what they are copy and pasting."

But Mueller did not charge or suggest charges for anyone on one of the biggest questions he faced: whether the Trump campaign worked with the Russians to influence the election.

Read people, bloody hell.
Click to expand...
Do you read, or read into? That says he didn't find enough evidence to charge anyone on that one count. How does that mean it was fabricated? Do you know what fabricated means?
 
JazzyFresh said:
As I said, i don't deal with people who can't even use their own voice. It shows that they need others to talk for them and that obviously means they don't understand what they are copy and pasting.

By all means, your own words, who was indicted for collusion?
Click to expand...
If you have been paying attention, I never said that in any way. All I did was call out your assertion that it was fabricated and admitted to. And you've still done nothing to show that. You take it to the farthest reaches of assumption. Try to show PROOF of YOUR OWN CLAIM. That's it. Not assumptions. Not implications. Just proof that what you said is true. YOU KEEP MOVING THE GOALPOSTS.
 
LogGrad98 said:
If you have been paying attention, I never said that in any way. All I did was call out your assertion that it was fabricated and admitted to. And you've still done nothing to show that. You take it to the farthest reaches of assumption. Try to show PROOF of YOUR OWN CLAIM. That's it. Not assumptions. Not implications. Just proof that what you said is true. YOU KEEP MOVING THE GOALPOSTS.
Click to expand...
I feel I have provided plenty of proof.

Obama officials admit there was zero evidence. Zero. So where did this evidence come from? If Obama officials had no evidence? Who did?

The FBI
Ohhh you mean the evidence vwe now know is Russian propaganda? Why was Hillary warned by the FBI but not Trump? Hmmm...

Why did the FBI have to straight faced lie to get said FISA warrant? Why did they fabricate evidence? If the Trump campaign really colluded then there would be no reason to lie

Then Mueller, you know, the main investigator admits he found that Russia meddled(under Obama) but Trump nor his campaign were guilty of collusion.

This is the FBI that on record stated they would not allow Trump to be president Strzok and Page via text.

Then I provided proof in your own article that stated nobody was indicted for colluding.

Nobody was ever indicted for collision and even the people indicted like Flynn we now have proof that the FBI extorted him by saying they were going to either get him fired or force him to lie

This is all 100% fact. There is absolutely no disputing any of this this is 100% proof that Trump didn't collude.
 
LogGrad98 said:
Do you read, or read into? That says he didn't find enough evidence to charge anyone on that one count. How does that mean it was fabricated? Do you know what fabricated means?
Click to expand...
Yes it means they(the FBI) made up(fabricated) and used fabricated (made up)evidence to obtain a warrant to illegally spy on the Trump campaign. In Mueller's own reports he admits that the FBI used false info(I believe he uses the word propaganda), out of Russia, to spy on an elected officials. Again this isn't hearsay like what Trump is going through with this soldiers thing, this has been investigated and is in writing by an actual former head of the FBI.
 
LogGrad98 said:
If you have been paying attention, I never said that in any way. All I did was call out your assertion that it was fabricated and admitted to. And you've still done nothing to show that. You take it to the farthest reaches of assumption. Try to show PROOF of YOUR OWN CLAIM. That's it. Not assumptions. Not implications. Just proof that what you said is true. YOU KEEP MOVING THE GOALPOSTS.
Click to expand...
"Much of that information was inconsistent with, or undercut, the assertions contained in the FISA applications that were used to support probable cause and, in some instances, resulted in inaccurate information being included in the applications," the report stated.

So... If something is inaccurate, how does it become that way? Was it fabricated? Yes. It was false information. False information just doesn't randomly make itself, someone else made it.

Off topic but let's also remember we have known of meddling since 2014 and nothing was done. I have no facts as to why worthless Obama didn't stop it then but according to some in his own cabinet he allowed them to meddle in return for Putin to sign onto his Iran deal. Again his staffs words, not mine. His own intelligence even admits to being told to stand down. So its weird how you all blame Trump for Obama allowing meddling under HIS presidency. He should've stopped it in 2014 but he didn't. He sold America for Iran.

The same guy who told Russia on a hot mic "once I'm re-elected I can give you more leeway". Giving the people meddling in our own elections leeway. Wtf is that supposed to mean?
 
Last edited:
I’ve fallen several pages behind on this thread, so I’m not sure if the information being commented on in this clip, in its particulars, has been discussed already. However, if not, it seems relevant to contrast with the mistaken belief that there was never anything to the Russia story. The Senate Intelligence Committee findings were also not the final say, if one takes seriously journalist Mike Schmidt’s revelations, as outlined by Maddow.



I think any leverage the Russians have over Trump involves financial relationships. At least, that’s always been my best bet in what it is that he has tried so hard to keep hidden. I recall when Trump told Mueller, via a tweet, that Mueller should not be looking at Trump’s finances. For whatever other reasons Trump has held that information sealed, there’s a connection to Russia in there that would be damaging, probably to the extreme. Just a hunch.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top