What's new

Thread for responding to lies spread by JazzyFresh

Now do Hunter Biden while Biden was VP. 3.5 smackers

Someone gave Hunter Biden ~$3.5M to invest in the US, and Hunter Biden invested it. How horrible!

Show me where proud boys are looting, burning down buildings, destroying innocent peoples livelihoods...

We have had multiple instances in this forum discussing the Proud boys, and similar groups, bringing weapons to left-wing rallies and starting fights with them.

You're just trying to distract yourself from the democratic party who are actually doing these things.

I doubt you can name one Person that you can a) show is a member of the democratic party, and b) has committed violence during these protests.

Ps **** the proud boys but they are not the ones terrorizing cities.

Depends on the city. Portland has been terrorized by them, among others.

You don't see Trump or Republicans openly supporting these groups like you all.

Trump just did in the last debate. Steve King of Iowa support them. I can name a few others, but you'll just ignore it, so there is no point.

Reduce major drug prices like insulin
Bring drug manufacturing to the us for generic drugs(huge I think)
Openly force drug companies to disclose pricing

-Things Trump is doing right now but it's nowhere near enough.

Can you name one drug whose price has been reduced by Trump? One drug whose manufacturing location was moved to the US? Drug pricing was public long before Trump.

Did you say anything when Biden said

"Unlike the African American community, with notable exceptions, the Latino community is an incredibly diverse community with incredibly diverse attitudes about different things,"

"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy, I mean, that's a storybook, man."

Yes, I did, back when he said them years ago.

So 7% do. How is this a good thing in any stretch of the imagination? The part you guys completely miss is that the 7% are completely diminishing the other 93%.

We understand that completely.

The mass majority of people agree that black lives matter but when you have people destroying innocent people businesses, doxxing police families, forcing innocent people to put up their fist and shout black lives matter, shooting security guards, ambushing police proceeding to block ambulances yelling they hope the cops dies.

There was no ambulance blocking, and the rest of those actions were not performed by members of Black Lives Matter.

Screaming "death to America"(a small percent but it's being said). Unlike you guys I can denounce the Proudboys and the KKK. They don't represent me.

I denounce the people committing violence. They don't represent Black Lives Matter.

What he's saying is bluntly racist.

It was. He apologized. Black people decided the apology was sufficient, and voted him into the Democratic nomination. Now the only people who hold it against Biden seem to be the same people who oppose the existence of Black Lives Matter. I don't think that is a coincidence.

Both Biden and Trump have been accused of sexual assault.

Biden by one person (Reade) with a history of saying fantastic things (I think something happened between Reade and Biden, but probably not what Reade is currently saying). Trump by something like 20 women, most of whom don't have Reade's history. This is the whataboutism you so regularly deride elsewhere.

I did say "things he is doing" as in things he is working on that I like.

In four year, two with a fully Republican Congress, he has done nothing regarding health insurance.

... BLM is guilty of, ...

Again, not members of BLM.

This is not MAGA, we are generally peaceful.

The FBI, who tracks actual terrorism, sees it differently.

He's representing the entire Democrat party. That is blatantly defending him. I mean, how is in not?

I guess Biden knows how to apologize and make it stick.

No you didn't.

You asked to to do a Google search, I did, and the links showed I was right. You promptly ignored them, as is your way.
 
You said it. My parents didn't teach me the racism you speak of so of course I'll single your racist parents out

I agree the racism your parents taught you was a completely different type the the racism I picked up from media, teachers, friends, etc.
 
Bull... You said none of this but in hindsight. ... You guys were telling me how stupid I was because I didn't understand how exponential growth would make 75,000,000 MINIMUM, sick. That was the entire argument.

I went to get the original post.



As is fairly plain, it refers to the number infected. JazzyFresh immediately tries to turn that into the number who will get sick, which is smaller than the number who will be infected. Perhaps he honestly does not understand the difference.

In little later, Red says ...
Dr. Fauci did say, after all, that if we do not respond to the degree required, we could expect millions of American deaths.

Note "respond to the degree required" , which more than covers Reds point that he referred to efforts sans mitigation.

As for 75M infected, the lowest estimate for heard immunity is about 20% of the population. So, I will assume for now JazzyFresh doesn't question that.
 
@One Brow I wonder if there are early posts where Jazzy scoffs at even 10,000 U.S. deaths.

I remember those days, people were like "Only a few hundred people have even died, why is everyone freaking out like this is a big deal?"

Back then there was a suggestion that possibly 100,000 - 200,000 people in the U.S. might die and it was laughed at and mocked.

Jazzy has a hard time understanding fairly simple concepts about who is saying what. For instance, if I say "I found a report from the CDC that says X" The people saying that thing are the CDC and whomever contributed to the research they based their report on. Also, when these types of predictions are made it isn't a person simply declaring their beliefs. There is no real personal connection there. The Dr.s and scientists are simply saying "we did this test (details) and this is what the results suggest." If that turns out not to be true the question is whether or not the test was conducted correctly based on the best information available possible, or if the test was intentionally skewed. It's not a "Your test incorrectly predicted the actual result, you're a liar!" That's just not how it works but I don't think Jazzy has the mental ability to understand that.
 
I went to get the original post.



As is fairly plain, it refers to the number infected. JazzyFresh immediately tries to turn that into the number who will get sick, which is smaller than the number who will be infected. Perhaps he honestly does not understand the difference.

In little later, Red says ...


Note "respond to the degree required" , which more than covers Reds point that he referred to efforts sans mitigation.

As for 75M infected, the lowest estimate for heard immunity is about 20% of the population. So, I will assume for now JazzyFresh doesn't question that.
Lol stupid again and proves nothing.

Lol how much life have you wasted on me?
 
That's just not how it works but I don't think Jazzy has the mental ability to understand that.

I don't really care why JazzyFresh repeats the lies he does, whether it's trolling, willful blindness, intense and sincere devotion, etc. He does not seem to be lacking in basic mental ability, but outside of that, I don't care.
 
Hey @LogGrad98
I showed that Red correctly summarized what he posted, and that you took a statement and claimed it was about something else.



If I thought it were a waste, I would not respond. Why do you think it is a waste?
Lol you claim I lack basic mental ability and you're picking on me. What a garbage human thing to do.

If you wanna waste your time obsessing about me, thats cool. I appreciate it. Just see like a waste of energy.
 
I don't really care why JazzyFresh repeats the lies he does, whether it's trolling, willful blindness, intense and sincere devotion, etc. He does not seem to be lacking in basic mental ability, but outside of that, I don't care.
He does seem unable to understand those basic concepts. That you think it's because he's lying isn't any better.
 
Postal service doesn't matter when Taylors drug dealer bf shot first.

Taylor's drug-dealer ex-boyfriend was in jail, so he could not have shot at all. Taylor's current boyfriend was not a drug dealer.

K. Walker did indeed shoot first, after his door was broken down. That's on the police for creating and escalating the situation to that point.

It's clear cut and dry if your not an idiot. Unfortunate but clear cut.

Legally, police are permitted to put innocent people in a situation where they have to either allow strangers to break into their house or suffer gunfire from people who will suffer no consequences. It's very clear cut.

The sad thing is how your racist party is treating the AG for simply following the law.

Why do you think the Republicans are treating the AG badly?

Crazy how Democrats practice modern day slavery to any black person who doesn't do what they're told.

You managed to demean black people and diminish slavery at the same time.

You guys literally hate any black that is Republican or doesn't bow down to your plantation tactics

Another whine from another white guy who thinks he speaks for black people.
 
Taylor's drug-dealer ex-boyfriend was in jail, so he could not have shot at all. Taylor's current boyfriend was not a drug dealer.

K. Walker did indeed shoot first, after his door was broken down. That's on the police for creating and escalating the situation to that point.
Dude you're arguing against a grand jury lol. How astonishingly stupid.
 
Dude you're arguing against a grand jury lol. How astonishingly stupid.

Dude, I specifically said that "Legally, police are permitted to ...". My only surprise at the grand jury response was that any cop was indicted at all. What the police did was legal, and two innocent people are dead. That's the problem.
 
Back
Top