Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
By "we" I meant the dump I took during the game, if you watched the game I think you'll agree it was a ****y (crappy) game and there for my crap could be included into the team.
Win.
By "we" I meant the dump I took during the game, if you watched the game I think you'll agree it was a ****y (crappy) game and there for my crap could be included into the team.
He's on the Bungles dood... Brady and Manning are on the Patsies and Colts. Big Difference.
Garrard has to have back surgery... thus the reason he is sitting at home.
Quite a few teams wanted Palmer but the owner wouldn't budge on trading him until the Raiders made them an offer they couldn't/wouldn't refuse.
The big difference is that those team are going to have a shot at somewhere between the best prospect in 30 years, or three other good prospects. The Raiders are playing THIS year and don't have a franchise QB, while the guy that was not very good but holding down the fort got injured. They had to do something.He is not sitting at home because he needed back surgery.
And who wanted Palmer? Or should I say who, currently, was willing to trade even one first rounder for him let alone two? I don't believe for a second that the Dolphins, Colts, or any other organization would have traded one first rounder this year (especially considering Luck's out there) or next for him.
Your point? The Bengals are proving this year how mediocre Palmer really was.
Surprised they didn't go after Orton. They just saw the Broncos trade a pro bowl receiver for a 6th rounder. They could have gotten Orton for a 5th rounder. Palmer does have a higher risk/reward though.
Word is it's 1 first rounder plus another conditional 1st rounder. I thought Al Davis was dead? Who's giving the OK to give up so much for an aged QB?
If you think Palmer is the whole reason that the Bungles have sucked for decades then you really need to take a step back as a fan or even someone that watches football. They have possibly the worst owner in professional sports and some of the worst management to ride along.
There is a reason they have only made the playoffs what.. once in the past 20 years?
Regarding Garrard needing back surgery... please read... by the way, the Raiders did take a look at him prior to finding otu this information (reports say)...
https://www.profootballweekly.com/2011/10/17/garrard-needs-surgery-for-back-injury
The big difference is that those team are going to have a shot at somewhere between the best prospect in 30 years, or three other good prospects. The Raiders are playing THIS year and don't have a franchise QB, while the guy that was not very good but holding down the fort got injured. They had to do something.
I don't know anything about Gerrard's health condition, but assuming he is healthy, you're right. They could've at least seen what Gerrard had before taking on Palmer. It's insane Gerrard has just been sitting so far this season.
I think it's a win/win for both teams. Raiders did give up quite a bit for Palmer, but honestly they are young and loaded at all the skilled positions, so while losing potentially 2 first rounders looks bad, it really isn't that bad for Oakland. They get a proven veteran QB that can manage the game, and that can throw the deep ball. The Bengals hit a massive home run here. At worst they get another 1st in 2012 and a 2nd in 2013 for a player they don't need. They can basically stock pile more skilled players around Dalton over the next two seasons. Their defense is already a playoff caliber defense.
Many teams were looking at Palmer at the beginning of the year but Brown said no way he was trading him. There were many teams rumored and I am too lazy to go look for articles to support it. I'm not saying many teams NOW at the trade deadline were interested but before the season started.
I do think he is an upgrade to Campbell personally but we will see. Oakland is a grave for QB's since Gannon but without Davis there Palmer will have an opportunity to lead the team. Remember what Gannon did? That is why you can gamble with a trade like this. If Palmer is resortly close to what Gannon was and with what they have in place they could possibly be an AFC contender immediately. Campbell to me was not a good QB in anyway...
Time will only tell who got the better trade. As of right now, I think they both won.
The Bengals definitely won. With multiple first rounders the next couple years, they can really stockpile talent and build around the red-headed rifle.
It's one first rounder isn't it? Don't the Raiders have to make the playoffs for it to be two or did I hear wrong?
So they gave up just one first rounder hoping not to make the playoffs? Brilliant.