Thee Idiotic Minivan K
Well-Known Member
Shhhhhhhh don’t tell my wife.
Shhhhhhhh don’t tell my wife.
Thee is like the anti-ONE LOVE.If I didn’t already have Magic and Curry I would’ve been eyeing the big O at this point. Solid pick.
Damn straight!! I guess Big O could’ve been my 2guard. LolThee is like the anti-ONE LOVE.
Going to go with the 5 point guards Draft this year.
This might be useful at some point in the draft (or might be totally useless), but I'm thinking if someone is thinking of selecting an undrafted player that their "draft year" would be considered their rookie year. Sound good @Wes Mantooth / everyone?
I would say that his draft eligible year would be the most appropriate.Hmmmm…I’m open to discuss this. Royce O’Neale was not drafted iirc, played overseas for a year or two, and then came back, right? So should we use the year he could’ve been drafted or his rookie year?
I’m completely open to board consensus here.
I was going to say rookie year, but then I thought about the international stashed players. Would we still count draft year for someone like Tibor Pleiss?Hmmmm…I’m open to discuss this. Royce O’Neale was not drafted iirc, played overseas for a year or two, and then came back, right? So should we use the year he could’ve been drafted or his rookie year?
I’m completely open to board consensus here.
This was my thinking; it would be easier to discover a definitive year if going by rookie year. Also, I don't believe you have to declare for the draft at some point to be signed.I was going to say rookie year, but then I thought about the international stashed players. Would we still count draft year for someone like Tibor Pleiss?
Then again, it could be difficult to say when they would have been drafted. Some people were available in more than 1 draft.
Fine, rookie year.
Also, I honestly doubt that there will be anyone who was undrafted, whose rookie year and draft eligible year were different, and who the gap between those years happens to span decade boundaries. I don't think anyone will fit that circumstance in the first 60 picks.This was my thinking; it would be easier to discover a definitive year if going by rookie year. Also, I don't believe you have to declare for the draft at some point to be signed.
I say no. At no point can a team have any two of their first five players drafted, from the same era.What about trades? Could I, for example, trade Michael for Wilt, leaving me with 2 players drafted pre 1979?
I say no. At no point can a team have any two of their first five players drafted, from the same era.
See, I like the idea of making it so all of your first 5 picks have to be from different eras, but in terms of matchups we should be able to adjust our lineups however we want.I agree with this but what if I want to start my sixth pick instead of my fifth? I say we make it mandatory you have to start 5 different players from all 5 of the era’s defined.
See, I like the idea of making it so all of your first 5 picks have to be from different eras, but in terms of matchups we should be able to adjust our lineups however we want.